NOThe article discusses concerns over the growing power of the U.S. presidency, particularly under Donald Trump, and argues that the American political system has built-in checks and balances that are often overlooked. It highlights how the executive branch has expanded its authority, especially in foreign policy, with examples such as former President Barack Obama authorizing drone strikes without congressional approval. The piece emphasizes that while Trump challenges democratic norms by questioning election results and attacking independent institutions, the U.S. system is more than just the president. It explains that power is distributed across federal and state levels, with Congress and the Supreme Court playing critical roles in limiting presidential influence. The article warns against misunderstanding the complexity of American democracy through a simplified Norwegian perspective.
Lettura del bias (Centro): The article presents a balanced view of the U.S. political system, discussing both the expansion of presidential power and the existing institutional checks and balances. It critiques Trump's actions but does not take a partisan stance, instead emphasizing the structural aspects of American politics
Perché questi punteggi (Fattualità 85 · Obiettività 90): The article presents a well-reasoned analysis of U.S. political institutions and their checks on presidential power, citing historical examples such as Lincoln and Obama. It does not make unsubstantiated claims but rather offers a nuanced perspective. The tone remains largely neutral and analytical.
