NOThe article discusses Norway's 'Ulv' conspiracy theory, which claims that Norwegian wolves are not native to the country but were introduced by external forces. The theory suggests that authorities and research institutions have lied, manipulated, and distorted the truth about the return of wolf populations in Norway and Sweden. The author, Jan Ingar Thon, references the work of rovdyrskeptic Lars Toverud, who first popularized this idea over two decades ago. The piece frames the debate around the authenticity of Norway’s wolf population, highlighting concerns about misinformation and the influence of alternative narratives within environmental discourse.
Lettura del bias (Destra): The article presents the 'Ulv' conspiracy theory as a credible challenge to mainstream scientific consensus, using emotionally charged language such as 'løyet', 'manipulert', and 'fordreid sannheten' (lied, manipulated, distorted the truth). It positions the theory as a legitimate counter-narrative,
