A second demolition of unauthorized construction has been planned in the town of Novo mesto, following the recent removal of a structure in the Roma settlement of Brezje-Žabjak. The local municipality confirmed that they hold another binding decision from the building inspectorate requiring the removal of an illegally constructed object. Despite efforts over several months, the execution of this decision has yet to take place, with the timing still unclear. The demolition of the illegal structure in Brezje-Žabjak occurred on July 10, after the decision from the building inspectorate became final. The wooden cabin, built by a young Roma couple, was removed without their knowledge, just one day after the ruling took effect. According to officials, the municipality already holds another such binding decision, which requires the removal of another unauthorized structure. However, the exact date for the new demolition has not been determined. Efforts to enforce the previous decision have been ongoing for many months, but were hindered due to actions taken by other state authorities. Officials emphasized that the decision is binding and that further steps to execute it are currently underway. They did not confirm whether the new structure is located in the same settlement, but noted that it stands on green areas where residential construction is prohibited, making legalization impossible. The investors were informed of the decision before the construction began, but according to them, they do not cooperate with the municipality in seeking solutions. The municipal administration stated that it has actively supported the regularization of property statuses and improved living conditions in Roma settlements for years. As part of these efforts, the municipality has signed ten agreements for building rights aimed at legalizing structures with the possibility of later land purchase. It also facilitates temporary connections to public infrastructure for legalized or regulated buildings and co-finances design services for legalization processes for socially vulnerable citizens. To date, ten agreements for building rights have been signed and paid, while only one application for co-financing design services has been received and approved. However, the process has not been completed within the required timeframe. The municipality stressed that all Roma settlements within its area are spatially regulated and can connect to municipal infrastructure. According to the building inspectorate, procedures for demolishing unauthorized constructions are typically lengthy and legally complex. The recent case in Brezje-Žabjak is one of the few exceptions, as the time between the decision becoming final and the actual demolition was only one day. Meanwhile, the municipality claimed it was unaware that the demolished structure had occupants or who its owner was, based on information provided. The building inspectorate indicated that on December 31, 2025, they handled 8,366 administrative inspection cases, with 4,154 resulting in decisions regarding unauthorized construction and 2,837 initiating enforcement proceedings. Most of these decisions were executed voluntarily, meaning the responsible party removed the unauthorized structure themselves. Only 25 were enforced through third parties, usually when the unauthorized structures posed a danger to people or the environment or affected public interest significantly. Enforcement procedures are generally slow due to the legal complexity involved. Responsible parties often use legal remedies and other forms of legal protection provided by law, including regular and extraordinary legal means, requests for deferral of enforcement, court proceedings, protection of the right to home, and selection of enforcement methods. It is common practice for parties to submit various applications shortly before anticipated enforcement, which can significantly delay or temporarily prevent the removal. In the case of the recent demolition in Žabjak, the speed of the action appears to be partly due to the lack of legal challenges from the owners. The municipality, as the landowner, received the decision from the inspection and initiated the demolition process accordingly. They confirmed that there were no obstacles prior to the demolition, as the site was found unoccupied and the investor or owner of the unauthorized construction was unknown. The wooden cabin was reportedly built by the partner of the occupant over five months and occupied since May.
2 servizi
N1 SlovenijaIndipendenteCentroFattualità 90Obiettività 853 gg fa La demolizione di un edificio nero in una colonia rom non era del tutto normale.L'articolo discute della demolizione insolitamente rapida di una struttura illegale nell'insediamento rom di Brezje-Žabjak, che ha richiesto solo un giorno dal momento in cui la decisione è diventata giuridicamente vincolante. In genere, i processi di demolizione sotto l'ispezione edilizia sono lunghi e giuridicamente complessi, comportano più passaggi e potenziali sfide legali da parte del proprietario della proprietà. Il comune locale, che possiede il terreno, ha dichiarato di non essere a conoscenza della struttura occupata o di avere un proprietario registrato. L'articolo evidenzia che mentre la maggior parte delle strutture illegali sono rimosse volontariamente dai proprietari, solo 25 casi sono stati eseguiti attraverso appaltatori esterni tra il 2021 e il 2025. L'ispettore ha spiegato che le azioni di esecuzione sono in genere riservate ai casi che comportano rischi significativi per le persone o l'ambiente, o in cui c'è un impatto importante sull'interesse pubblico. La velocità del caso Brezje-Žabjak è stata attribuita alla mancanza di sfide legali da parte dei proprietari della proprietà.
Lettura del bias (Centro): L'articolo presenta le informazioni fornite sia dall'ispettore edilizio che dal comune locale, senza apertamente favorire nessuna delle due parti; esso fornisce una relazione equilibrata sulla natura insolita del caso, sul processo tipico e sulle ragioni che hanno spinto all'azione rapida.
Perché fattualità (90): This article provides additional context about the unusual speed of the recent demolition compared to typical procedures. It includes statistics from the building inspectorate regarding the number of cases handled and the usual process, which supports the factual claims made in the first article. Th
Perché obiettività (85): The article maintains a balanced tone, explaining both the unique circumstances of the recent case and broader statistical data. While it highlights the exceptional nature of the event, it does not take sides or express strong opinions, maintaining a generally objective stance.
N1 SlovenijaIndipendenteCentroFattualità 85Obiettività 8022 h fa Un'altra costruzione nera in città nuova è in programma di demolizione.Dopo aver demolito con successo una di queste strutture il 10 luglio, ora si trovano di fronte a sfide nell'esecuzione di un secondo ordine di demolizione a causa dei ritardi causati da altre autorità statali. Il nuovo edificio di destinazione si trova su aree verdi in cui è vietata la costruzione residenziale, rendendo impossibile la legalizzazione. Nonostante questi sforzi, il comune continua a promuovere la legalizzazione delle strutture esistenti attraverso accordi per i diritti di costruzione e i collegamenti infrastrutturali, anche se i progressi rimangono lenti.
Lettura del bias (Centro): L'articolo presenta informazioni di fatto sulle azioni comunali relative alle costruzioni illegali senza apertamente favorire alcuna parte politica, includendo sia le sfide affrontate dal comune che i loro sforzi continui per affrontare la questione con mezzi legali, mantenendo un tono equilibrato.
Perché fattualità (85): The article reports on the demolition of an illegal structure in a Roma settlement in Brezje-Žabjak, citing a decision by the building inspectorate. It mentions the ongoing efforts by the municipality to carry out the demolition, the lack of success over the past year, and details about the location
Perché obiettività (80): The tone remains neutral, presenting facts about the situation without overt bias. However, there is some emphasis on the challenges faced by the municipality, which may slightly lean towards highlighting administrative difficulties rather than providing a completely impartial perspective.
★
Manteniamo le notizie oneste.
ObjectiveNews è finanziato dai lettori e senza pubblicità: ti mostriamo il bias invece di nasconderlo. Sostieni il giornalismo indipendente per 5 €/mese.
Diventa sostenitore