SloveniaThe legal network 'Pravna mreža za varstvo demokracije' argues that Ljubljana's parking decree was not legally revoked and therefore still remains in effect. This means that a referendum on the decree could still proceed. According to their interpretation of the statute of the City of Ljubljana, if the mayor believes a general legal act or part of it is unconstitutional or illegal, they must notify the city council in writing within eight days of its adoption, providing reasons for the objection and proposing a reconsideration at the next session. The city council can then discuss the specific articles of the decree cited by the mayor and decide whether to amend or revoke them. However, according to 'Pravna mreža,' the disputed decree has not been properly revoked and thus continues to apply. They argue that attempting to override the decision without proper legal grounds would undermine constitutional principles and the mechanisms of direct democracy.
Lettura del bias (Progressista): The article presents arguments from 'Pravna mreža za varstvo demokracije,' which advocates for democratic accountability and constitutional compliance. The framing emphasizes the importance of legal procedures, constitutional rights, and preventing arbitrary decisions by local authorities, aligning
Perché questi punteggi (Fattualità 85 · Obiettività 75): The article reports on legal arguments regarding the legality of removing a parking regulation in Ljubljana, citing the statute of the City Council. It presents the position of the legal network as stated, but uses emotionally charged language like 'buri duhove' (which translates to 'stirs up spirit
