I deputati si sarebbero sentiti minacciati, ma Sukić ha detto: "Se avessi voluto colpirlo, credetemi, l'avrei colpito".
Nataša Sukič, poslanek leve stranke Levice, je med sejo odborov Državnega zbora (DZ) vrgla poslovnik v smer Predsedujočega Žana Mahniča (SDS). Dejanje je povzročilo debato o sigurnosti v parlamentarnih prostorih, saj Katja Kokot (Resnica) trdi, da se v tem okolju ne osjeća več varno. Kokot je pozvala k naznanitvi sum kaznivega dejanja nasilništva in zahtevala sankcijo ter vzpostavljanje reda. Sukič pa je zavrnila obtožbe, razložila, da je dejanje bilo simbol, ne grožnja, indarila, da poslovnik predstavlja zakonito demokratično orožje. Tutti i partecipanti si sono espressi in modo diverso: Godec (SDS) je podprlavo obravnavo dejanja na etični komisič, mentre Suki ko kritiji kozirale politične igreže in spod sovraštvo.
An ethical committee will examine the actions of Left Party MP Nataša Sukič after she threw a book at the chairperson of the National Assembly during a session. The move has sparked mixed reactions among politicians and members of the public. According to reports, Sukič claims her action was symbolic and did not intend to harm anyone. Meanwhile, Resnica MP Katja Kokot has called for formal charges against Sukič for alleged threats involving weapons, stating she feels unsafe in the parliamentary building. Kokot accused Sukič of threatening to use weapons and throwing the book toward the chairperson of the session, Žan Mahnič (SDS). She emphasized that she does not feel safe anymore in the premises of the National Assembly and demanded sanctions and the restoration of order within the institution. “I personally feel threatened and do not want to sit in the same room with someone who commits such acts,” Kokot stated. Sukič defended her actions, describing them as a symbolic gesture meant to highlight the lack of respect for the parliamentary rulebook. “It was a somewhat angry act, but I certainly didn’t target him,” she said. “If I had wanted to hit him, I would have done so.” She argued that Mahnič had no authority to put a procedural motion to a vote to prevent the session from taking place. Sukič described the book as the “bible of parliament” and claimed it was not being respected. In response to accusations of making threats with weapons, Sukič cited a quote from Bertolt Brecht: “A book is a weapon, take it in hand.” She explained that as a pacifist, humanist, and anti-militarist, she considered the book as a legitimate democratic tool. “For me, the book is our legal democratic weapon,” she added. Sukič insisted that she stood behind her actions and did not threaten anyone. She challenged Kokot and President of the Resnica party and the National Assembly, Zoran Stevanović, to file criminal charges against her if they felt threatened. Sukič criticized their behavior, accusing them of using the parliament for their political games. She also accused Kokot of publicly defaming others and inciting hatred through a social media post reading “Babi se je ftrgalo.” The reaction to Sukič’s actions has been varied. Jelka Godec, leader of the SDS MPs, supported Kokot and argued that throwing objects at someone, whether intending to hit them or not, constitutes violent conduct. She pointed out that in previous mandates, opposition members used language as a weapon but never physically attacked anyone in the parliament. “Do not accuse us of things we ourselves have done,” she urged. Borut Sajović, leader of the Freedom party MPs, viewed Sukič’s move as symbolic. He noted that Sukič highlighted a problem in the current mandate within the assembly. He praised Mahnič for accepting the gesture with humor and dignity. Sajović doubted that Mahnič, known for his outdoor activities, was frightened by Sukič's action. However, he stressed the need to avoid such incidents and emphasized the importance of respecting the parliamentary rules. Mojca Žnidarič (Democrats) praised Mahnič for turning the situation into a joke but criticized the overall behavior in the National Assembly. Democrats condemned similar actions and expressed disappointment over the conduct observed in the assembly. The ethical committee will consider the incident, according to the requests made by Kokot and the demands raised by other parties. Sukič agreed to the examination by the ethical committee, acknowledging that her move went beyond established norms and stirred both the parliament and the public. She believes each person has their perspective on this action and that her voters see it differently.
2 servizi
Maribor24IndipendenteCentroFattualità 95Obiettività 8914 h fa
Nataša Sukič, poslanek leve stranke Levice, je med sejo odborov Državnega zbora (DZ) vrgla poslovnik v smer Predsedujočega Žana Mahniča (SDS). Dejanje je povzročilo debato o sigurnosti v parlamentarnih prostorih, saj Katja Kokot (Resnica) trdi, da se v tem okolju ne osjeća več varno. Kokot je pozvala k naznanitvi sum kaznivega dejanja nasilništva in zahtevala sankcijo ter vzpostavljanje reda. Sukič pa je zavrnila obtožbe, razložila, da je dejanje bilo simbol, ne grožnja, indarila, da poslovnik predstavlja zakonito demokratično orožje. Tutti i partecipanti si sono espressi in modo diverso: Godec (SDS) je podprlavo obravnavo dejanja na etični komisič, mentre Suki ko kritiji kozirale politične igreže in spod sovraštvo.
Lettura del bias (Centro): L'articolo presenta entrambe le prospettive, le affermazioni di Kokot di sentirsi insicure e di chiedere un'azione disciplinare, e la difesa di Sukič del suo gesto simbolico, senza apertamente favorire una parte.
Perché fattualità (95): This article closely aligns with the first in terms of factual content, accurately reporting the situation involving Sukičeva's symbolic act, Kokot's allegations of threats, and Sukičeva's response. It includes direct quotes and contextual details about the parliamentary session and the ethical revi
Perché obiettività (89): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting both perspectives without overt bias. It avoids strong emotive language but does include some direct quotes that may reflect personal views. The overall balance between the two positions is maintained effectively.
DnevnikIndipendente🔒CentroFattualità 93Obiettività 8713 h fa
Nataša Sukič, poslanek leve, je med sejo odborov v parlamentu vrgla poslovnik v smeru predsedujočega Žana Mahniča (SDS). Dejanje je povzročilo razpravo o tem, ali gre za nasilno grožnjo ali simbolno gesto. Etična komisija bo obravnava njene dejanja, kar je Sukičeva sama predlagala. Poslanka Katja Kokot (Resnica) je zahtevala, da se Sukičeva obtoži za nasilno dejanje in da policija oceni, ali gre za grožnjo. Sukičeva pa je zavrnila te trditve, pouladari pa je, da je poslovnik simbol demokratického orožja in da niogar ogrožala. Mešani so tudi bili odzivi drugih poslancev, je Jelka Godec (SDS) Kokanila brotovo in poula, da metanje vsakega primera v predmetov reprezentuje nasilno dejanje.
Lettura del bias (Centro): L'articolo presenta entrambe le prospettive: Sukičeva afferma che la sua azione è stata simbolica e non minacciosa, mentre Kokot l'accusa di comportamento minaccioso.
Perché fattualità (93): The article accurately reports that the ethical committee will review Sukičeva's actions, citing Kokot's call for formal notification of potential assault and Sukičeva's claim that her action was symbolic. It includes direct quotes from both parties and provides context about the parliamentary sessi
Perché obiettività (87): The article presents both sides fairly, quoting Kokot's concerns about safety and Sukičeva's defense of her symbolic gesture. However, the phrasing 'mešani odzivi' (mixed reactions) introduces a slight subjective interpretation rather than strictly reporting facts. Overall, the tone remains neutral
Come l’ha coperta ogni schieramento
Lo stesso evento, raggruppato per l’orientamento politico delle testate che ne parlano.
progressista
centro
conservatore
★
Come l’ha coperta ogni schieramento
Sostieni notizie indipendenti e consapevoli del bias e sblocca il polso social, il voto della comunità e tutte le altre funzioni per i sostenitori.
ObjectiveNews è finanziato dai lettori e senza pubblicità: ti mostriamo il bias invece di nasconderlo. Sostieni il giornalismo indipendente per 4 €/mese.