The trial of former leaders of the Kosovo Liberation Army (UÇK) has been postponed once again, this time until July 16. The Special Chambers of Kosovo have announced that the first-instance verdict against Hashim Thaçi, Kadri Veseli, Jakup Krasniqi, and Rexhep Selimi will now be delivered on July 16 at 10:00 AM. This decision follows an evaluation by the Trial Chamber, which stated that extending the deadline was absolutely necessary due to the complexity of the case and the volume of evidence that needed to be reviewed. The Trial Chamber has received testimony and evidence from approximately 270 witnesses (oral and written), accepted 5,467 pieces of physical evidence, and the court transcript contains 29,238 pages. The extension was deemed essential to ensure a reasoned, comprehensive, and fair assessment of the evidence, as well as to provide a detailed written justification reflecting these findings accurately.
The postponement comes amid ongoing public and political pressure surrounding the trial. The process has already spanned nearly six years of pre-trial detention and a multi-year judicial procedure. The delay has sparked concerns about fairness and justice, particularly among supporters of the accused who argue that the prolonged proceedings undermine their rights and dignity. The Trial Chamber emphasized the need for thoroughness, but critics claim that the delays reflect systemic issues within the judicial system handling the case.
Supporters of the former UÇK leaders have continued to organize protests in various countries, including Croatia, where another demonstration is planned for May 5. These protests aim to highlight what they perceive as injustice in the trial process. Gazmend Syla, Deputy Chairman of the Organization of Veterans of the UÇK War, expressed confidence that the upcoming protest in Croatia would be as large as previous demonstrations held in Skopje, Pristina, The Hague, Tirana, and Strasbourg. He emphasized that the protests are not only about demanding justice for the accused but also about ensuring transparency and fairness throughout the legal process. Syla warned that there are fears regarding the final verdict, given the perception of bias during the trial.
In addition to the protests, questions have arisen about the legitimacy of certain individuals' involvement in the UÇK. Dritan Goxhaj, known as a protest leader in Albania, claimed to have participated in the UÇK war. However, Syla clarified that Goxhaj does not appear in the records of the Organization of Veterans of the UÇK War. According to Syla, Goxhaj is not listed as a participant in any brigade, battalion, or operational zone during the conflict. This discrepancy has led to further scrutiny and debate over the accuracy of claims made by individuals involved in the protests.
Political reactions to the postponement have also been significant. The Democratic Party of Kosovo (PDK) criticized the decision, calling it a deepening of injustice against the former UÇK leaders. In its statement, the PDK expressed concern over the extended period of pre-trial detention and the lengthy judicial process, arguing that the delay goes beyond procedural delays and instead reflects an unjustified prolongation that undermines trust in the judiciary. The party emphasized that the trial must be based solely on law, verified facts, and high standards of justice, rejecting any unsubstantiated claims raised during the process. It reiterated its stance that the UÇK's war was just and liberating, a historical truth that cannot be altered by judicial processes or ongoing delays.
The PDK called for an end to this long-standing injustice and expressed hope that justice would prevail so that the former UÇK leaders could return freely to Kosovo, reuniting with their families and fellow citizens. As the trial approaches its next scheduled date, all parties remain engaged in the discourse around justice, fairness, and the legacy of the UÇK war. The outcome of the trial continues to be a focal point for both legal and political discussions, with implications that extend far beyond the courtroom.
3 servizi
RTKStatale / pubblicoCentroFattualità 95Obiettività 904 gg faLe Camere specializzate del Kosovo hanno annunciato un ritardo nel verdetto di primo grado per gli ex leader dell'Esercito di liberazione del Kosovo (UÇK), tra cui Hashim Thaçi, Kadri Veseli, Jakup Krasniqi e Rexhep Selimi, spostando la data al 16 settembre alle 10:00. L'organo giudiziario ha spiegato che l'estensione era necessaria a causa della complessità del caso e del volume di prove da esaminare. Oltre 270 testimoni hanno fornito testimonianze, sono state accettate 5.467 prove fisiche e la trascrizione del processo comprende 29.238 pagine. La corte ha sottolineato che il ritardo garantisce una valutazione equa, completa e accurata delle prove, nonché l'obbligo di fornire una motivazione scritta che rifletta accuratamente le prove.
Lettura del bias (Centro): L'articolo presenta la motivazione della corte per il ritardo del verdetto in modo neutrale, concentrandosi sulla necessità procedurale e sui requisiti probatori.
Perché questi punteggi (Fattualità 95 · Obiettività 90): Highly factual with specific details about the court's decision to extend the deadline, citing procedural complexity and evidence volume. The tone remains neutral and informative.
Koha.netIndipendenteSinistraFattualità 90Obiettività 856 gg faGazmend Syla, Deputy Chairman of the Organization of Veterans of the Kosovo Liberation Army (UÇK), expressed expectations that the upcoming protest in Croatia would be as large as previous demonstrations held in defense of former UÇK leaders currently on trial in The Hague. These protests aim to highlight concerns over perceived injustice in the trial process. Syla emphasized that while they do not claim innocence for the accused, they strongly oppose any unfairness in the proceedings. Previous protests were organized in Skopje, Pristina, The Hague, Tirana, and Strasbourg. The four former UÇK leaders—Hashim Thaçi, Kadri Veseli, Jakup Krasniqi, and Rexhep Selimi—are under investigation by the Specialist Prosecutor’s Office since November 2020 but have declared their innocence. Additionally, Syla mentioned that Dritan Goxhaj does not appear in the organization's database as a UÇK fighter, despite claims by Goxhaj himself and others.
Lettura del bias (Sinistra): The article frames the protests as a response to perceived injustice in the trial of former UÇK leaders, emphasizing opposition to unfairness rather than directly addressing legal arguments. It highlights the organizers' stance against bias in the judicial process, which aligns with a left-leaning,抗
Perché questi punteggi (Fattualità 90 · Obiettività 85): The article discusses expectations for a large protest in Croatia supporting former UÇK leaders. It quotes Syla and outlines plans for the demonstration without taking sides. Information is presented clearly and objectively, focusing on organizational details and goals. Cross-source consensus suppor
RTKStatale / pubblicoSinistraFattualità 85Obiettività 654 gg fa PDK reagisce dopo il rinvio del processo a L'AiaIl Partito Democratico e Kosovaro (PDK) ha risposto al ritardo nel rilascio del verdetto finale nel caso contro gli ex leader dell'Esercito di Liberazione del Kosovo (UÇK) presso i Tribunali Speciali dell'Aia. Il PDK condanna la decisione come un attacco ingiusto contro queste persone, sostenendo che dopo sei anni di detenzione preventiva e un lungo processo giudiziario, il ritardo si è trasformato in un ingiusto rigetto della loro fiducia nella giustizia. Il partito chiede che il verdetto finale sia basato esclusivamente sulla legge, sui fatti verificati e su standard più elevati di giustizia, respingendo qualsiasi affermazione infondata fatta durante il processo. Il PDK riafferma la sua posizione che la guerra combattuta dall'Esercito di Liberazione del Kosovo è stata una lotta giusta e legittima per la libertà del popolo del Kosovo, che non può essere cancellata o minimizzata da alcun processo giudiziario.
Lettura del bias (Sinistra): L'articolo inquadra la risposta del PDK come una difesa dell'equità e della giustizia giuridica, sottolineando la legittimità delle azioni dell'Esercito di liberazione del Kosovo e criticando il processo giudiziario come politicamente motivato.
Perché questi punteggi (Fattualità 85 · Obiettività 65): Factual but clearly biased in favor of the accused, using strong language like 'theft of justice' and framing the delay as unjust. Lacks balance in presenting opposing viewpoints.
★
Manteniamo le notizie oneste.
ObjectiveNews è finanziato dai lettori e senza pubblicità: ti mostriamo il bias invece di nasconderlo. Sostieni il giornalismo indipendente per 5 €/mese.
Diventa sostenitore
XK
%2Ffile%2Fauthors%2F5235797431519000504.jpg&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)
