The Sudanese armed forces have launched a strategic offensive, seizing control of four key towns along the road connecting Khartoum to El-Obeid, the capital of North Kordofan, on July 26, 2025. This marks a turning point in the ongoing conflict, which has remained largely stagnant for months. The captured towns lie on a critical route, reinforcing the army’s position and potentially altering the balance of power in the region. According to military sources, the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), the army’s main rival, had been gathering strength near El-Obeid for weeks, preparing for a potential breakthrough. Now, with the army pushing them back, the front lines have shifted significantly. The offensive follows nearly two years of intense warfare that has left much of Sudan in ruins. Since April 2023, the conflict between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the RSF has escalated into one of the deadliest crises in modern history. Reports indicate that over 200,000 people have lost their lives, and millions face starvation. The humanitarian toll continues to mount, with entire communities displaced and basic services such as healthcare and clean water becoming increasingly scarce. In the bordering country of Chad, the situation has worsened dramatically, with over 938,000 Sudanese refugees fleeing the violence. In eastern Chad, the overcrowded refugee camps have become sites of desperate struggle. At the Goudrane refugee camp, conditions have deteriorated to a crisis level due to a severe lack of clean water. For nearly four days, the reservoirs were completely empty, forcing residents to rely on sporadic deliveries. A truck carrying 6,000 liters of water arrived, drawing hundreds of people to the site. Women and children were among the first to arrive, often standing in line for hours. Some resorted to extreme measures, including pouring out the limited water they had brought with them, simply to secure access to the new supply. According to survivors, within ten minutes, the entire load was gone, leaving families once again without reliable access to water. The scarcity of resources has led to heightened tensions and desperation. Local reports describe scenes of chaos, with parents unable to protect their children from the harsh realities of survival. One mother, Rokhia Ibrahim, recalled how she had to watch helplessly as her family struggled to find even a few drops of water during their escape from Sudan. “I watched as soldiers poured out the little water we had,” she said. “And now, almost nothing remains.” The crisis extends beyond immediate survival concerns. Health professionals in the camps have expressed alarm over the growing impact of water shortages on public health. A doctor at the Goudrane health post noted that without clean water, essential treatments for infections and diseases cannot be administered effectively. “We have medicine for treating illnesses, but without clean water, these medicines are useless,” he explained. International aid groups have also raised urgent warnings about the worsening conditions. French humanitarian organisation Solidarités International, which has operated in Chad since 2008, described the current water crisis as one of the most severe challenges they have faced. Despite efforts to improve access, financial constraints limit the ability to meet the increasing demand. “We are doing everything possible to improve water access, but our current funding is insufficient to ensure safe water for everyone,” said Thibault Henry, the organisation’s director. Meanwhile, the conflict itself shows no signs of abating. The war, now entering its fourth year, has spread across much of Sudan, with attacks intensifying and new waves of refugees continuing to flee. The United Nations has repeatedly called the situation the worst humanitarian and refugee crisis in the world. Despite international calls for peace, progress has been minimal, and hopes of returning home remain distant for many displaced individuals. In El-Obeid, the strategic significance of the town has made it a focal point of the battle. Located at a crucial crossroads, the city serves as a vital link between Khartoum and the western regions of Darfur, areas heavily influenced by the RSF. With the SAF reclaiming control, the town now stands as a symbol of shifting military fortunes. However, the road to Khartoum remains blocked to civilians, and the future of the region remains uncertain. As the conflict continues, the human cost grows ever more profound, with countless lives hanging in the balance.
4 servizi
Le MondeIndipendente🔒CentroFattualità 88Obiettività 753 gg faL'esercito sudanese ha fatto un avanzamento strategico catturando quattro città chiave lungo la strada che collega Khartoum a El-Obeid, la capitale del Nord Kordofan, che è stata assediata dal gruppo paramilitare Rapid Support Forces dal 2023.
Lettura del bias (Centro): L'articolo riporta uno sviluppo militare in Sudan senza apparenti inquadrature ideologiche, scelta di parole o enfasi che suggeriscano una particolare inclinazione politica.
Perché fattualità (88): The article reports on findings from a UN investigation into the role of Boeing 727 aircraft in supplying weapons and drones to the RSF, referencing satellite imagery and a Reuters investigation. It includes details about the aircraft being operated by companies linked to a former U.S. military cont
Perché obiettività (75): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, focusing on the operational aspects of the aircraft and their role in logistics. There is some mention of the geopolitical context, but overall, the reporting remains focused on factual descriptions without overt emotional or political bias.
N1 SlovenijaIndipendenteCentroFattualità 85Obiettività 78ieriOltre 938.000 persone sono fuggite dalla guerra civile in Sudan dall'aprile del 2023, cercando rifugio nel vicino Ciad. Circa 50.000 di loro vivono ora nel campo profughi sovraffollato di Goudrane, dove la grave carenza d'acqua ha creato condizioni pericolose per la vita. I residenti descrivono scene caotiche mentre migliaia di persone combattono per le limitate forniture d'acqua portate da camion, con donne e bambini in prima linea nella lotta. La situazione è peggiorata a causa dell'insufficiente aiuto umanitario e della crescente domanda, lasciando molti senza accesso ad acqua potabile pulita. Gli operatori sanitari avvertono che senza acqua adeguata, i trattamenti medici non possono essere amministrati correttamente. Nel frattempo, le speranze di tornare a casa stanno svanendo man mano che il conflitto continua a intensificarsi.
Lettura del bias (Centro): L'articolo presenta un resoconto fattuale della crisi umanitaria causata dalla guerra civile in corso in Sudan, concentrandosi sulle sofferenze dei rifugiati in Ciad.
Perché fattualità (85): The article provides detailed information based on reports from Al Jazeera and references data from the United Nations, aligning with cross-source consensus. It accurately describes the humanitarian crisis, the number of displaced people, and the water shortage in Goudrane refugee camp. The quotes f
Perché obiettività (78): The tone remains largely descriptive and empathetic, focusing on the suffering of refugees. While it presents facts objectively, there is a slight emotional undertone when describing the desperate situation, such as 'prebivalci taborišča so opisovali, kako so ženske v prvi vrsti kričale.' This adds
AfricanewsIndipendenteCentroFattualità 75Obiettività 804 gg faIn Sudan, secondo due fonti militari, l'esercito ha ripreso il controllo di un'autostrada critica che collega la capitale, Khartoum, alla città di El-Obeid. Questo sviluppo segue mesi di accumulo di truppe da parte delle forze rivali di supporto rapido (RSF), che ora sono state spinte verso ovest lontano dall'autostrada. El-Obeid si trova in un crocevia strategico, collegando la rotta nord-sud a Khartoum e l'asse est-ovest che collega le roccaforti RSF nel Darfur alle aree controllate dall'esercito. Mentre l'autostrada rimane chiusa ai civili, il progresso dell'esercito fornisce una rotta di rifornimento alternativa per El-Obeid.
Lettura del bias (Centro): L'articolo presenta un resoconto fattuale degli sviluppi militari in Sudan senza apertamente favorire l'esercito sudanese o le Forze di supporto rapido.
Perché fattualità (75): The article reports that the Sudanese army regained control of a crucial highway linking Khartoum to El-Obeid, citing military sources. It provides context about the ongoing conflict with the RSF and mentions the impact on supply routes. While the information aligns with the cross-source consensus,
Perché obiettività (80): The article presents the military actions neutrally, using terms like 'regained control' and 'pushed west.' It avoids taking sides and focuses on reporting the events without emotional language, maintaining a balanced tone.
Deutsche Welle (English)Statale / pubblicoCentro8 h faNella città sudanese di el-Obeid, gli attacchi dei droni delle forze paramilitari di supporto rapido (RSF) hanno causato notevoli distruzioni alle infrastrutture civili, comprese scuole, ospedali e strutture per il trattamento delle acque. I filmati pubblicati dalla rete Ayin non partigiana mostrano edifici abbattuti dove una volta si trovava una scuola. I residenti locali, compresi quelli sfollati a causa del conflitto, affrontano gravi carenze di cibo, acqua pulita e forniture mediche. Secondo Ahmed Awad, un project manager di Plan International, un attacco con drone su una scuola elementare ha provocato la morte di tre bambini, causando traumi e paura diffusi tra gli studenti e le loro famiglie.
Lettura del bias (Centro): L'articolo presenta un resoconto equilibrato della situazione ad el-Obeid, evidenziando l'impatto degli attacchi dei droni sui civili e sulle infrastrutture senza assumere una chiara posizione ideologica.
★
Manteniamo le notizie oneste.
ObjectiveNews è finanziato dai lettori e senza pubblicità: ti mostriamo il bias invece di nasconderlo. Sostieni il giornalismo indipendente per 5 €/mese.
Diventa sostenitore
