Gli studenti delle scuole superiori stanno protestando contro One Nation. Che senso ha se non possono votare?

High school students in Australia are staging a nationwide walkout to protest against One Nation, a political party led by Pauline Hanson. The demonstrations, organized by the National Union of Students, aim to challenge what organizers describe as the party's racist and far-right stances on multicultural issues. The protests are expected to involve hundreds of high school and university students skipping classes across the country. However, the move has sparked debate over the legitimacy of youth involvement in political activism, particularly given that students under 18 are not eligible to vote. The protests come amid growing concerns about the influence of One Nation, which has seen a surge in popularity in recent months. The party's rhetoric on multiculturalism and immigration has drawn criticism from various quarters, including political figures and media commentators. Liberal Senator Alex Antic criticized the protests, questioning why students would engage in political actions they cannot directly influence through voting. He argued that students should focus on their education rather than participating in demonstrations. The backlash against the student protests mirrors previous criticisms faced during the School Strike for Climate movement, where similar accusations were made that young protesters lacked sufficient understanding of the issues they were advocating for. Critics argue that students are often portrayed as naive or manipulated by adults, undermining their role in shaping public discourse. Despite the controversy, supporters of the student protests emphasize the importance of youth engagement in civic matters. They highlight the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which recognizes the right of children and young people to participate in political and civic activities. In Australia, this includes the right to have their voices heard even before they reach voting age. Elected representatives are expected to be accountable to all constituents, regardless of their age or voting status. Research indicates that young people are not merely passive participants in political discussions but actively seek ways to influence societal governance. Studies analyzing submissions from high school students to the Whitlam Institute’s “What Matters?” competition reveal that students have thoughtful perspectives on pressing issues such as climate change, economic inequality, and social justice. These findings suggest that young people possess a nuanced understanding of complex societal challenges when given the opportunity to express their views. Participation in civic and political actions from a young age offers numerous benefits, including the development of critical thinking skills and the ability to articulate concerns effectively. However, current civics and citizenship education programs fall short of meeting the needs of both students and the broader community. Engaging in protests can help bridge knowledge gaps and foster a deeper understanding of democratic processes. Advocacy efforts among youth also bring attention to institutional barriers that hinder public participation in Australian democracy. One such barrier is the current voting age of 18, which some researchers argue should be lowered to 16. Additionally, limited access to the judicial system for young people presents another obstacle to their ability to effect change through legal means. Strategic climate litigation initiated by younger activists underscores the potential impact of increased judicial access on addressing key societal issues. The rise of One Nation continues to capture national attention, with its leader Pauline Hanson making headlines for controversial statements regarding Australia's multicultural identity. Meanwhile, former Opposition leader Sussan Ley, following her exit from politics, embarked on a transformative journey through the United States. Her experiences on Greyhound buses highlighted the stark contrasts between the U.S. and Australia, emphasizing the successes of Australia's multicultural approach. Ley observed a disconnection between the political elite and everyday Americans, reinforcing her belief in the value of Australia's inclusive policies. Her insights into the complexities of American society further underscore the significance of maintaining a cohesive and diverse national identity.