Green Ribbon drive combatte il taglio degli alberi a Pangasinan

Environmental activists in Pangasinan have launched a symbolic campaign to oppose large-scale tree cutting in the province, hanging green ribbons on roadside trees to highlight their demand for the preservation of natural resources. The initiative, organized by the Pangasinan People’s Strike for the Environment (PPSE) and supported by youth groups, local councils, and other environmental organizations, took place on Saturday along Maramba Boulevard in Lingayen. Each ribbon bore messages urging residents to “save the trees before the province loses another piece of its natural heritage.” The protest targeted ongoing efforts to remove trees, particularly within the Capitol Complex in Lingayen, which the activists argue prioritizes infrastructure and economic gain over ecological sustainability. According to PPSE, the ribbons represent a collective commitment to protecting trees that act as natural barriers against rising temperatures, flooding, and the intensifying effects of climate change. The group emphasized that destroying these green spaces does not equate to true development and warned that the loss of public green areas undermines community well-being. The campaign follows a similar event held on July 16 at the Urdaneta City People’s Park, where PPSE and its allies renewed calls for an immediate halt to deforestation in the region. These activities form part of a larger movement aimed at safeguarding the remaining tree cover and public parks in Pangasinan. Activists have urged local authorities to investigate those responsible for unauthorized tree removals and to ensure future development plans align with environmental conservation goals. The provincial government has defended the tree-cutting operations, stating that the removal of invasive species such as mahogany at the Capitol Complex is part of a planned redevelopment of the area. Officials did not provide further details on the scope of the project or the specific reasons behind the selection of certain tree species for removal. Environmental groups, however, remain skeptical of the justification, arguing that the process lacks transparency and adequate consultation with affected communities. Similar concerns have emerged in Cebu, where civic and environmental organizations have requested Oslob town officials to disclose information about the proposed Oslob Sports and Cultural Center. In a letter dated July 9, the groups expressed alarm over plans to repurpose part of the town's public plaza and cut down century-old trees. They contend that the project threatens both historical landmarks and the ecological integrity of the area. Activists in Pangasinan and Cebu share common ground in opposing developments they view as environmentally harmful and socially unjust. Both campaigns reflect growing public awareness of the need to balance urban expansion with the protection of natural ecosystems. Local leaders in Pangasinan have yet to formally respond to the demands made by PPSE, while officials in Oslob continue to withhold key project documentation. The protests underscore a broader debate over how local governments should manage land use and infrastructure projects. While some officials emphasize the importance of modernization and economic growth, others stress the necessity of preserving green spaces for climate resilience and public health. As the situation unfolds, environmental advocates are likely to maintain pressure on authorities to adopt more transparent and ecologically sound policies. The latest developments indicate that the struggle over land use in Pangasinan and Cebu will continue to attract attention from civil society, legal experts, and environmental watchdogs. With new campaigns planned and existing ones gaining momentum, the focus remains on ensuring that development does not come at the expense of the environment.