Gianni Infantino has defied expectations and remains as FIFA president, despite mounting pressure from European football authorities and growing discontent within the organization. The Swiss official, who took over from Sepp Blatter in 2016, has refused to resign, even though he abandoned controversial plans to sell stakes in the World Cup to private investors. His survival comes after a tense week marked by internal dissent, public accusations, and a failed attempt to reshape the financial structure of international football. The crisis began when leaked documents revealed Infantino’s proposal to sell parts of the World Cup to outside investors, a move widely criticized as financially unsound and politically reckless. The plan, known as the Fifa Forward Enterprise (FFE), sparked outrage among football stakeholders, particularly in Europe, where Uefa and several national federations condemned the initiative as a betrayal of the sport’s principles. The English FA, once a vocal supporter of Infantino, withdrew its backing, signaling a shift in sentiment among some of the most influential voices in world football. In response, Infantino convened an emergency meeting in Rabat, Morocco, bringing together key figures from FIFA’s executive team. The session, held in the aftermath of the leaked proposals, was intended to address concerns and reaffirm support for his leadership. According to reports, the meeting included FIFA Secretary General Mattias Grafstrom, Finance Chief Thomas Peyer, Legal Director Emilio Garcia Silvero, and other senior officials. While the discussion reportedly aimed to clarify the situation, it did little to quell the growing unrest. Some insiders suggest that the meeting was more symbolic than substantive, with no real resolution offered to the criticisms leveled against Infantino. Despite the internal turmoil, Infantino has received backing from key allies, including the Asian Football Confederation (AFC). Although the AFC has not officially endorsed him, several member nations, particularly Saudi Arabia, which hosts the 2034 World Cup, are said to remain supportive. This stance contrasts sharply with the position of Uefa, which continues to demand Infantino’s resignation. Uefa’s recent statement emphasized that the conditions for lifting its boycott of FIFA competitions have not been met, and it reiterated its loss of confidence in the current administration. The political landscape surrounding Infantino’s tenure is complex. While Uefa and the English FA have taken a firm stand against him, other regions, notably Africa and South America, have shown greater tolerance for his leadership. This divergence highlights the challenges faced by FIFA in maintaining unity among its 211 member associations. For now, Infantino’s survival seems assured, thanks in part to the reluctance of some powerful nations to challenge his authority directly. The upcoming March election presents a crucial test for Infantino. If he wishes to retain his position, he will need to secure at least 106 votes from the total of 211 members. While Uefa and a handful of other confederations have expressed opposition, the majority of FIFA’s membership remains silent on the matter. This silence could either bolster Infantino’s chances or expose the deep divisions within the organization. Meanwhile, the fallout from the World Cup sale debacle continues to reverberate. Former football legend Luis Figo, among others, has openly criticized Infantino, accusing him of undermining the integrity of the sport. These attacks, combined with internal dissent, have placed Infantino in a precarious position. Yet, for now, he remains in power, relying on the support of key allies and the absence of a unified front against him. As the dust settles, the fate of FIFA’s leadership, and the direction of global football, remains uncertain.
★
Manteniamo le notizie oneste.
ObjectiveNews è finanziato dai lettori e senza pubblicità: ti mostriamo il bias invece di nasconderlo. Sostieni il giornalismo indipendente per 4 €/mese.
Diventa sostenitore
United Kingdom
