Il diario rivela che Fauci è ossessionato dalla fama mentre i decessi per COVID aumentano

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nation's top infectious disease expert, revealed in newly released diary entries that he was deeply preoccupied with his public image during the early stages of the coronavirus pandemic. The documents, obtained by Senator Rand Paul, detail Dr. Fauci’s reflections on his growing influence and the media's fascination with him as the crisis unfolded. On March 22, 2020, with over 10,000 new cases and more than 125 deaths reported in the U.S., Dr. Fauci noted in his journal that the press was “going wild with me.” He expressed satisfaction with the media's alignment with his views, often contrasting them with President Donald Trump's stance. These entries, part of a 1,141-page electronic document, offer insight into Dr. Fauci’s mindset as the virus spread across the country. The diary entries trace Dr. Fauci’s early involvement in the pandemic, starting with the emergence of the virus in China and its subsequent transmission to the U.S. He initially referred to the virus as the “Wuhan virus,” a term that has since fallen out of favor. Dr. Fauci maintained the belief that the virus originated from animal-to-human transmission, dismissing the alternative theory that it stemmed from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. This position remained steadfast even as evidence emerged suggesting otherwise. In 2021, when the FBI’s experts concluded that the lab might have been the source, Dr. Fauci dismissed their findings, calling them “having no idea what they’re talking about.” Dr. Fauci’s interactions with President Trump are also documented in the diary. During an early meeting in January 2020, Trump reportedly assured him that they were “counting on you,” signaling a level of trust. However, tensions soon developed. By January 2021, Dr. Fauci had grown increasingly critical of Trump, describing him as “a very dangerous man!!” This shift in tone became more pronounced as the administration changed hands, with Dr. Fauci continuing to advise the Biden administration despite his polarizing reputation. The diary also provides a glimpse into Dr. Fauci’s personal frustrations. He criticized the quality of briefings from the CIA, labeled Florida Governor Ron DeSantis as “a total jerk” for his pandemic management, and called Trump’s advisor Peter Navarro an “amazing a, hole!!!” His relationship with Senator Rand Paul, a frequent critic of his pandemic policies, was particularly contentious. Dr. Fauci referred to Paul as “his usual stupid self” and “a total a, hole!!” while noting Paul’s persistent efforts to challenge his authority. Senator Rand Paul, an ophthalmologist and political figure known for his skepticism regarding the pandemic’s handling, sought to expose Dr. Fauci’s alleged misdeeds. He subpoenaed Dr. Fauci to testify before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, aiming to uncover information about the NIH’s funding of research in Wuhan and the potential cover-up of the virus’s origin. Among his questions were inquiries into why Dr. Fauci had requested a preemptive pardon from President Biden and whether he had played a role in concealing the virus’s origins. The diary entries also reflect Dr. Fauci’s evolving perspective on public health measures. On March 31, 2020, he acknowledged that his earlier assertion that masks did not work might have been overly strong, recognizing that the government would eventually endorse mask-wearing. This admission highlights the complexity of his role as both a scientific authority and a public figure navigating intense scrutiny. As the pandemic receded, Dr. Fauci’s legacy faced renewed examination. His initial guidance on masks and other preventive measures drew criticism, prompting introspection about the accuracy of his statements. Meanwhile, ongoing debates about the virus’s origins and the role of U.S. research institutions continue to fuel controversy. With Dr. Fauci set to testify before the Senate committee, the release of these diary entries adds another layer to the ongoing discourse surrounding his actions and beliefs during the pandemic.