In vista dei sondaggi, Netanyahu pubblica un'immagine dell'esplosione nucleare su Tel Aviv

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sparked intense political controversy on Sunday, October 25, by posting an artificial intelligence-generated image of a nuclear explosion over Tel Aviv on social media. The post occurred just two days before the national election scheduled for Tuesday, October 27. In the accompanying text, Netanyahu warned of an existential threat from Iran and urged citizens to prioritize addressing the Iranian nuclear program during the remaining two years of US President Donald Trump’s term. Opposition leaders immediately condemned the move, characterizing it as a desperate attempt to manipulate voters through fear and hysteria. The image, shared via Netanyahu’s official accounts on X and Instagram, depicted a massive mushroom cloud rising above a densely populated urban area, with a violent explosion engulfing multiple buildings. While the caption did not explicitly name the city, the visual context strongly suggested Tel Aviv. Netanyahu paired the graphic with a lengthy statement attributed to Israeli writer and political commentator Yuval Blumberg. The text asserted that the State of Israel faces a "real and tangible existential danger" and that if Iran acquires nuclear weapons, "nothing will ever be the same again." Blumberg’s statement, which Netanyahu endorsed, argued that current domestic political disputes constitute a "giant smokescreen" designed to distract from the singular priority of completing military operations against Iran. The text referenced a war initiated against Tehran by Israel and the United States on February 28, stating that the country has a limited historical window to ensure its physical survival. It specifically noted that there are "another two years of Trump to finish the work in Iran," expressing uncertainty about the policies of potential future US administrations, including those led by Kamala Harris or other candidates. The author warned that future generations would not forgive the current leadership for missing this opportunity. The post also contained pointed criticisms of political opponents. It claimed that the task of securing Israel’s safety would not be achieved under a prime minister held hostage by "Muslim Brotherhoods and their terrorist accomplices." It further alleged that such a leader would lack the capacity to maintain continuous intimate dialogue with President Trump or withstand the pressure of television interviews. The statement dismissed issues regarding Qatar, ultra-Orthodox conscription, and recruitment warnings as irrelevant distractions compared to the threat posed by Iran. Reaction from the opposition was swift and severe. Yair Golan, chairman of the Democrats party, criticized the prime minister’s decision to publish the image on X. Golan stated that he requested Netanyahu be kept away from social media, asserting that the prime minister and his inner circle had "lost it" as electoral pressure mounted. Golan promised that on Tuesday, his party would replace those spreading panic and restore security and sanity to Israel. Gadi Eisenkot, chairman of the Yashar party, also attacked the post, labeling it another instance of fearmongering typical of Netanyahu’s election campaigns. Eisenkot described the prime minister as hysterical and accused him of relying on lies and intimidation tactics to sway the electorate. The incident has intensified a broader dispute over Netanyahu’s handling of the Iranian threat, which has emerged as the central issue in the final days of the campaign. Israelis are set to vote on Tuesday to elect members of the 120-seat Knesset. The country utilizes a nationwide proportional representation system, meaning a party or coalition requires the support of at least 61 lawmakers to secure a parliamentary majority. Recent polling data indicates that Netanyahu’s bloc of parties is hovering around 50 seats, falling significantly short of the threshold needed to form a government. Conversely, the opposition bloc has reportedly gained last-minute momentum, aided by reports of left-leaning Israelis traveling to cast ballots against the incumbent. Background reporting suggests that Netanyahu has been pushing to resume large-scale strikes against Iran prior to the election. Analysts note that the United States and Israel are increasingly likely to resume military operations against Iran within weeks. Despite the high stakes, Netanyahu has remained in power for nearly 7,000 days since his first election in 1996. Political commentators observe that while the nuclear imagery shocked many Israelis, the prime minister’s strategy relies on the premise that fear is a more potent motivator than hope, particularly given widespread consensus among Israelis that Iran represents their primary adversary. The debate continues over whether this rhetorical escalation reflects strategic necessity or political desperation as the polls open.