Ne igramo se: Trampove prijetnje uznemiravaju tržište

Oil prices have surged to near six-month highs, climbing to just under $117 a barrel last week after trading below $100 a barrel in September. Futures market pricing suggests crude could remain above the $100 mark well into next year. This price spike occurs despite oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz returning to levels close to those seen before the conflict began. Shipments from the Middle East have rebounded, driven by tankers escorted by the United States Navy and others appearing to pay Iranian fees for safe passage. Additionally, flows through Saudi Arabia’s pipeline to the Red Sea have increased, although these routes face continued Houthi attacks on infrastructure including the port of Yanbu. The disconnect between physical supply and market pricing stems largely from exploding transportation costs. Chartering a tanker to move oil through the strait now costs approximately twelve times the pre-war rate. Insurance premiums for cargo have risen to more than triple previous levels. To incentivize mariners to accept the risks of potential attacks, ship captains are receiving wages nearly six times their former rates, along with bonuses amounting to tens of thousands of dollars. Crew members are earning two to three times their pre-war salaries. Operational changes have further strained logistics. Vessels are shuttling into and out of the strait to transfer cargoes to other ships waiting outside, adding both time and expense. This method has created a global shortage of tanker capacity, as extra vessels remain tied up in Middle East trade operations. Political developments involving President Donald Trump represent another key driver of market anxiety. With US midterm elections less than two weeks away, presidential rhetoric regarding Iran has hardened significantly. In late July, Trump halted attacks on Iran in an attempt to reduce pressure on oil prices ahead of the election cycle. He pursued several measures to lower domestic fuel costs, including convincing the Group of Seven nations to release strategic diesel reserves. He also permitted tax-exempt diesel, typically reserved for off-road use, to be utilized on public roads. Furthermore, he controversially lifted sanctions on Russia and negotiated a deal with Vladimir Putin to import Russian diesel into the United States. These actions have reportedly faced legal challenges. Despite these efforts, US gasoline prices remain 40 percent higher than a year ago, and diesel prices are up approximately 74 percent. Consequently, Trump’s polling numbers have hit new lows. On Thursday, speaking to reporters in Maryland, Trump stated that something would happen fairly soon regarding Iran. By Sunday, he declared it was decision time to either strike a deal or restart military attacks. Speaking on Fox News, he posed the choice directly: do I finish it off, which would be very easy to do, or do I make a deal? He concluded that the United States does not play games. The administration has begun moving diplomats and military staff out of the region while deploying additional military resources to the Middle East in preparation for potential escalation. Iranian officials have responded firmly to these threats. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi posted on social media that when the US previously sought to finish the job, Iran emerged even stronger. Tehran has vowed retaliation if American attacks resume. Security concerns in the waterway remain high. The UK Maritime Trade Operations Centre reported 11 confirmed attacks in the strait during the previous week. However, the actual number of incidents is likely higher, as the center notes that most targeted ships do not report attacks. Other authorities estimate there have been at least 28 incidents so far this month. Market participants watch these geopolitical signals closely as the election approaches. The combination of elevated shipping costs, persistent security threats, and unpredictable political rhetoric continues to drive premium valuations in energy markets. While physical barrels are moving, the financial cost of securing them has altered the economic landscape for consumers and producers alike. The situation remains volatile, with both sides maintaining hardline positions. Investors continue to assess the likelihood of renewed conflict versus diplomatic resolution. The current trajectory indicates sustained pressure on energy costs unless a definitive shift in policy or security conditions occurs. The interplay between military posturing and economic necessity defines the current environment for global energy trade. All eyes remain on the coming days for signs of de-escalation or further confrontation. The stakes involve not just regional stability but broader global inflation trends. As the election deadline nears, the potential for rapid change in US foreign policy posture increases uncertainty for traders worldwide.