Otklonjen kvar zbog kojeg je dio istočnog Zagreba ostao bez strujePrekinut je struja u dijelovima istočnog Zagreba kasno poslijepodne, što je potvrdio HEP (hrvatski dobavljač električne energije).
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak izvještava o tehničkom pitanju povezanom s nestankom struje i njegovim utjecajem na javni prijevoz i stambene zone.
Zašto činjenice (85): This article mirrors the first in content and timing, confirming the outage and restoration through HEP. It includes details about affected neighborhoods and tram disruptions, consistent with other reports.
Zašto objektivnost (85): The writing is very neutral, focusing solely on reporting the incident without any subjective commentary or emotional language.
Novi listNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 85Objektivnost 8007. 09. 2026.Istočni dio Zagreba bio je bez struje od oko 19:05 do otprilike 20:45 u ponedjeljak, prema HEP-u.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja činjenično izvješće o tehničkom pitanju koji utječe na opskrbu električnom energijom u Zagrebu, bez otvorene ideološke okvire.
Zašto činjenice (85): The article accurately reports the outage timeline and confirms the resolution via HEP. It provides specific times and affected areas, aligning with the cross-source consensus. However, it does not mention the tram disruption as prominently as other sources.
Zašto objektivnost (80): The tone remains neutral, presenting facts without emotional language. The focus is on reporting the event rather than taking sides, though there is slight emphasis on the impact on daily life.
Index.hrNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 75Objektivnost 7007. 09. 2026.Veliki dio Zagreba bio je bez struje dva sata večeras, što je utjecalo na područja kao što su Maksimir, Dubrava, Dubec i Sesvete.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak izvješćuje o kvaru tehničke infrastrukture i njenom utjecaju na stanovnike, fokusirajući se na sam prekid rada, pogođena područja i odgovor HEP-a.
Zašto činjenice (75): The article provides a clear account of the outage but includes some inconsistencies, such as mentioning 'some parts of Dubrava had power' while also stating 'half of Dubrava was without power.' This may reflect reader reports rather than verified data. It also lacks direct confirmation from HEP bey
Zašto objektivnost (70): While generally neutral, the article includes quotes from readers that suggest frustration and lack of information from HEP, which introduces a slightly more critical tone.
Croatia
