Ice agents tackled a man at Las Vegas airport, sparking public outrage and calls for accountability, according to video footage and statements from officials. The incident took place at Harry Reid International Airport on Monday, when two plainclothes ICE agents attempted to detain an elderly man who had overstayed his visa. The man, identified as Phu Nguyen, a 57-year-old Australian citizen, was left handcuffed on the ground after the agents fled when they realized they were being recorded. The Las Vegas Metropolitan Police later confirmed the individuals were ICE agents and found no outstanding warrants against Nguyen. They removed his handcuffs and informed ICE, who eventually arrested him at his departure flight from Los Angeles International Airport on Tuesday. The video, widely shared on social media, captured the tense moment as the man yelled and cried while being restrained. Elected officials and advocacy groups condemned the incident, citing concerns over the treatment of non-citizens and the broader implications of increased ICE presence at airports. Democratic U.S. Senator Jacky Rosen of Nevada criticized ICE for acting with impunity, stating that such actions instill fear in communities and harm the tourism economy. The Nevada Latino Legislative Caucus and the Asian American Native Hawaiian Pacific Islander Caucus urged Governor Joe Lombardo to investigate the incident and ensure transparency and accountability from federal law enforcement operating in the state. The episode adds to a pattern of scrutiny surrounding ICE's tactics, particularly following recent incidents where three individuals died during interactions with federal immigration agents. Concerns have also risen over the growing role of ICE at transportation hubs, with critics warning of potential abuses and lack of oversight. The situation unfolded amid heightened tensions around immigration policy and the increasing involvement of local law enforcement in federal immigration enforcement efforts. Separately, a similar controversy emerged at San Francisco International Airport, where a United Airlines employee allegedly threatened to call ICE on a passenger, claiming the individual did not “act like a citizen.” The incident, captured on video and shared by KQED, involved Julio Varela, a Mexican-American and naturalized U.S. citizen, who described the encounter as unprovoked. The employee, who refused to provide her name, reportedly told Varela, “Maybe you need to be, because you don’t act like a citizen. Get away.” Varela’s family ultimately boarded their flight after another United employee intervened and resolved the ticketing issue, but he expressed hope that the employee would be disciplined and considered legal action. Varela emphasized his identity as a U.S. citizen, highlighting his contributions to society, including owning a business and paying taxes. He accused the employee of racism, noting the timing of her remarks in light of ongoing societal issues. His comments reflect broader frustrations among immigrant communities regarding the tone and approach of immigration enforcement, particularly in public spaces. The incidents highlight the expanding influence of ICE beyond traditional borders, with the agency increasingly relying on partnerships with local law enforcement through programs like Section 287(g). These agreements allow state and local agencies to assist ICE in immigration enforcement, effectively extending federal authority into everyday policing. As of mid-July, over 1,768 agencies had signed agreements with ICE, with many adopting the task force model that grants local officers broad powers to make arrests and enforce immigration laws. Critics argue that this model blurs lines between local and federal law enforcement, complicating accountability and raising concerns about the rights of ordinary citizens. With more ICE agents operating under local jurisdictions, there is growing uncertainty about who is responsible for enforcing immigration laws and how such actions are regulated. The increasing number of uniforms and authorities involved makes it difficult for the public to discern who holds power and who is accountable for decisions made in the field. This trend underscores the need for clearer guidelines and greater transparency in how federal and local agencies collaborate on immigration matters.
10 izvještaja
RealClearPoliticsNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 85Objektivnost 75prije 6 danaNaslov "Pucnjave su vratile ICE u vijesti" sugerira da su nedavni incidenti koji uključuju imigracijsko i carinsko provođenje (ICE) ponovno pokrenuli javnu i političku raspravu oko aktivnosti agencije. Iako naslov ne pruža specifične detalje o pucnjavi ili njihovom kontekstu, to implicira obnovljeni fokus na ulogu ICE-a u provedbi imigracije.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Naslov je neutralnog tona, fokusirajući se na događaj ("pucanja") umjesto izražavanja presude ili zagovaranja.
Zašto činjenice (85): The article accurately reports the suspension of vehicle stops by ICE following the fatal shootings and includes details about the policy change. It aligns with the primary source document and provides context about the broader implications of the policy shift.
Zašto objektivnost (75): The tone is somewhat biased toward the administration's position, particularly in highlighting the policy change and the political fallout. It presents the situation with some emphasis on the administration's response.
Breitbart NewsNeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice 85Objektivnost 60prije 5 danaZastupnica Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) kritizirala je operacije ICE-a tijekom segmenta na CNN-u 'Laura Coates Live', tvrdeći da to nisu nedokumentirani imigranti, već službenici ICE-a koji čine zajednice nesigurnim.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se kritiziranje politika provedbe ICE-a opisuje kao šira kritika izvršne vlasti i prakse provedbe zakona.
Zašto činjenice (85): The article presents Rep. Jasmine Crockett's opinion on ICE operations and criticizes the agency, citing the deaths of individuals during encounters with immigration officers. However, it lacks direct sourcing to primary documents and focuses primarily on political commentary rather than factual rep
Zašto objektivnost (60): The tone is clearly partisan, with strong language suggesting bias against ICE and Trump's administration. The article frames the issue through a political lens, emphasizing criticism of government actions rather than presenting a balanced view.
ABC News (US)NeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice 80Objektivnost 75prije 4 danaVideo snimak dva agenta ICE-a koji pokušavaju zadržati starijeg Australca na aerodromu u Las Vegasu izazvao je javnu reakciju i pozove na odgovornost.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se navodi da je incident primjer preopterećenja ICE-a i zloupotrebe vlasti, naglašavajući ogorčenje javnosti i kritike demokratskih dužnosnika.
Zašto činjenice (80): The article accurately summarizes the AP report about the Maine shooting and the officer's background, citing family and record sources. It aligns with the primary source and provides additional context without introducing significant inaccuracies.
Zašto objektivnost (75): The article remains largely neutral, presenting facts without overt emotional language. It highlights the need for accountability but does not take a strong ideological stance, maintaining a balanced approach.
The New York Times (US)Neovisan🔒ProgresivnoČinjenice 65Objektivnost 60prije 3 danaThe New York Times izvještava da su stotine krivičnih slučajeva protiv prosvjednika i imigranata koje je pokrenula američka imigracijska i carinska služba (ICE) ili odbačene ili napuštene.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se raspada ICE slučajeva kao pokazatelj sistemskih neuspjeha u provedbi, što je u skladu s progresivnim kritikama imigracijske politike.
Zašto činjenice (65): The article reports on a different incident at a Las Vegas airport, which is not covered in the primary source. While it provides accurate details about the event, it lacks connection to the main topic of ICE shootings and the associated controversies.
Zašto objektivnost (60): The article is presented in a neutral tone, but it focuses on a separate issue that is not aligned with the primary source. The framing of the incident as controversial may influence the reader's interpretation.
NewsweekNeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice 60Objektivnost 55prije 3 danaZaposlenik United Airlinesa navodno je prijetio da će pozvati američku imigracijsku i carinsku službu (ICE) na putnika, Julio Varela, naturaliziranog američkog državljanina, tijekom spora oko pitanja izdavanja karata na međunarodnoj zračnoj luci u San Franciscu. Incident, snimljen na video snimku i podijeljen od strane KQED-a, prikazuje zaposlenika koji optužuje Varela da se 'ne ponaša kao građanin' i odbija dati svoje ime. Varela je tvrdila da je zaposlenik odbacio napore da se riješi složena greška u izdavanju karata koja uključuje Air Canada i United Airlines.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se navodi da je incident dio šire zabrinutosti o prisutnosti ICE-a i primjeni imigracijskog zakona, što se poklapa s progresivnim narativima kritičnim prema politikama Trumpove ere.
Zašto činjenice (60): This article is unrelated to the primary source and focuses on a different topic entirely—criminal cases against protesters. As such, it doesn't align with the factual content of the primary source document about ICE shootings.
Zašto objektivnost (55): The article is not objective in relation to the primary source, as it addresses a completely different subject. Its tone and focus do not contribute to understanding the events described in the primary source.
CBS News (US)NeovisanSredinaČinjenice 60Objektivnost 55prije 4 danaU članku se opisuje incident na zračnoj luci Harry Reid u Las Vegasu, gdje su službenici ICE-a u civilnoj odjeći pokušali zadržati čovjeka za kojeg su tvrdili da je prekoračio rok boravka na svojoj vizi.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja događaj kao činjenični događaj bez otvorene kritike ili pohvale ni za ICE agente ni za civile koji su bili uključeni.
Zašto činjenice (60): This article is unrelated to the primary source and discusses missing body camera footage in general, not specifically tied to the recent shootings. It lacks detailed information about the specific incidents referenced in the primary source, thus limiting its factual alignment.
Zašto objektivnost (55): The article is framed as a question, which may suggest skepticism toward ICE, but it does not take a definitive stance. The tone is somewhat critical, implying doubts about the agency's practices without providing full context.
Fox News (US)NeovisanKonzervativnoČinjenice 60Objektivnost 55prije 6 dana28-godišnji meksički muškarac poginuo je u udaru traktor-prikolice dok je bježao od agenata američke imigracijske i carinske službe (ICE) u St. Augustineu na Floridi. Incident se dogodio tijekom prometne zaustavljanja gdje su sva četiri putnika u vozilu pobjegla pješice, a žrtva je trčala preko prometne ceste i udario ju je kamionet.
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): U članku se ističe kontroverzni pomak u politici pod Trumpovom administracijom. Naglašava smrtne slučajeve povezane s interakcijama s ICE-om, što se poklapa s narativom kritičnim prema povećanoj primjeni imigracijskih zakona.
Zašto činjenice (60): The article briefly mentions the ICE shootings but focuses more on body cameras and the lack of oversight. It references former Secretary Noem's comments but does not tie them directly to the primary source. The information is somewhat relevant but not deeply connected to the core event.
Zašto objektivnost (55): The article leans toward advocacy, emphasizing the need for accountability and transparency. It uses language that suggests criticism of ICE without presenting opposing viewpoints, indicating a lack of balance.
NewsweekNeovisanKonzervativnoprije 5 h ICE je najbrže rastuća franšiza u Americi.U članku se raspravlja o tome kako imigracijska i carinska služba (ICE) širi svoje prisustvo kroz partnerstva s državnim i lokalnim agencijama za provedbu zakona u skladu s odjeljkom 287 ((g) Zakona o imigraciji i državljanstvu. Ovi sporazumi omogućuju lokalnim službenicima da pomognu u zadacima provedbe imigracije kao što su dostavljanje naloga, provjeravanje imigracijskog statusa i sudjelovanje u radnim snagama gdje mogu izvršiti uhićenja.
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): U članku se opisuje širenje ICE-a kao strateška i učinkovita metoda za povećanje njegovog dosega, uspoređujući ga s uspješnim franšiznim modelom.
The NationNeovisanProgresivnoprije 10 hU članku se govori o smrti Dara Hermana Zierleina Lorenza Salgada Arauja, koji je opisan kao otac, član zajednice, poslodavac i vlasnik kuće.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): Članak koristi emocionalno napunjen jezik ("žrtva") i usredotočuje se na ljudski trošak ICE-ovih postupaka, što se poklapa s lijevo orijentiranom perspektivom koja često kritizira politike provedbe imigracijskih zakona.
The AtlanticNeovisan🔒Progresivnoprije 7 danaU članku se navodi da je napadač u Maineu nedavno regrutiran od strane Uprave za imigraciju i carinu (ICE).
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): Članak opisuje regrutiranje strijelaca od strane ICE-a na način koji sugerira potencijalne sistemske probleme unutar agencije, što implicira moguće prekoračenje ili problematične prioritete.
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.
Postani podupiratelj
United States
