ON
← Natrag na feed
UGP odgovorio premijeru: Pomoć gospodarstvu nije dar Vlade, nego obveza države koju svi plaćamo
Croatia🏛️ PolitikaBliže progresivnomprije 8 dana

UGP odgovorio premijeru: Pomoć gospodarstvu nije dar Vlade, nego obveza države koju svi plaćamo

Unija poduzetnika i poslovnih ljudi (UGP) odbacila je tvrdnju premijera Andreja Plenkovića da poduzetnici šute kada vlada ograničava cijene energije, ali govore samo kada moraju platiti više. U izjavi UGP je naglasio da sredstva koja se koriste za energetske intervencije dolaze iz poreza i doprinosa koje plaćaju građani, obrtnici i poduzetnici, a ne iz vladinog proračuna.

In response to Prime Minister Andrej Plenković's recent statement, the Croatian Association of Entrepreneurs (UGP) has emphasized that assistance to the economy is not a gift from the government, but a responsibility of the state, which entrepreneurs and citizens fund through taxes and contributions. The UGP reiterated its call for serious analyses regarding how the state spends public funds, criticizing the government’s approach to increasing tax burdens on small businesses and self-employed individuals. According to the association, the financial support provided during past crises was funded by taxpayers, not the government’s budget, and they expect the same level of dialogue and reasoning when addressing new tax measures. The UGP rejected the prime minister’s claim that entrepreneurs remain silent when the government limits energy prices but become vocal only when required to pay more. They argued that entrepreneurs fully understand the importance of energy interventions, but these funds come from their own pockets, taxes and contributions paid by citizens, artisans, and entrepreneurs. While grateful for previous measures that helped preserve the economy during major crises, the UGP stressed that the same level of engagement should be applied when warning about the consequences of new tax burdens. The UGP criticized the government for labeling increases in taxes on tourist beds as symbolic, pointing out that such increases represent substantial percentages for families already paying other fees like tourism levies, property taxes, membership fees, utilities, maintenance costs, and platform commissions. For instance, raising the tax from €100 to €150 represents a 50% increase, while moving from €70 to €100 is over 40%. This is particularly problematic for families operating only 45 to 60 days per year, who face higher expenses and lower revenues. The UGP also highlighted the absurdity of placing Dubrovnik and smaller towns with inadequate infrastructure into the same tax bracket. These smaller towns have shorter tourist seasons, lower prices, and higher operational costs compared to well-developed tourist centers. Yet, they are taxed as if they operate in the most developed tourist areas, despite lacking basic services like sewage systems, ambulances, water supply, walking paths, or regular transport links. The UGP questioned what citizens and entrepreneurs receive in return for a nearly doubled state budget. Are public services twice as efficient? Are permits faster, justice better, administration simpler, and healthcare more accessible? Entrepreneurs face penalties for delays, while institutions rarely face consequences for their own delays. The UGP warned that the announcement of an autumn protest is not political theater but a response to a policy that increases taxes on certain groups while others are left unaffected. Today, it is the self-employed and small rental operators facing changes, but tomorrow it could be someone else. The UGP remained open to dialogue but insisted on serious analysis, fairness, stable rules, and clear answers about how the state spends money. If genuine dialogue does not occur, preparations for the autumn protest will continue. The UGP concluded that the state exists because of its citizens, not the other way around. Those who contribute to the budget deserve respect, predictable rules, and decisions based on analysis rather than assumptions that they can always pay more. The Fokus party responded to the prime minister’s proposal to abolish measures that set fuel prices every 14 days, supporting this move but simultaneously calling for the removal or significant reduction of taxes and duties on fuel. Fokus argued that fuel prices should not depend on political decisions, phone meetings, or temporary regulations. Instead, an open market, real competition, and clear rules for all are needed. However, if the government truly wants to test how much it can help citizens and the economy, it must not stop at abolishing price controls. It should also eliminate or significantly reduce taxes and duties on fuel, as these constitute a large portion of the final price paid at gas stations. Fokus leader Gabrijel Deak stated that if the prime minister is serious about abolishing measures, he welcomes the suggestion. But he urged going further, abolish administrative pricing, and let the state give up part of its revenue collected from each liter of fuel. He noted that citizens and entrepreneurs today pay not just the cost of oil and the trader’s margin but also high taxes and VAT. The state takes a significant portion of the final price paid at gas stations. Therefore, his simple proposal is to abolish the government’s control over prices while also abolishing taxes and duties on fuel during periods of high energy prices. Bruno Samardžić, president of the UGP, commented on the easing of tax changes for self-employed individuals, the government’s attitude toward small entrepreneurs, anti-inflation measures, the UGP’s demands to be included in decision-making processes, and the policy of fines imposed on hospitality providers and entrepreneurs. Samardžić emphasized that the UGP continues to demand inclusion in decisions affecting small entrepreneurs, stating that they have done their part by extending hands and attempting to reach agreements. They have sent letters before the minister’s press conference and will continue doing so, targeting both the Ministry of Economy and Finance. Their letters aim to ensure their inclusion in future steps and consultations in shaping policies. Samardžić added that the UGP believes it deserves a place at the table when making decisions that affect small entrepreneurs, as they represent specific interests not adequately represented in the public sphere. He acknowledged that the Croatian Employers’ Association (HUP) and the Croatian Chamber of Artisans (HOK) have different interests, but he stressed that the interests of one group should not come at the expense of another. Small entrepreneurs have their base and must be included in discussions. While HUP has its policies and channels, ultimately, it is the small entrepreneurs who have a voice. The UGP has legitimacy through its presence on social media and in public discourse, with over 90,000 members in Facebook groups and other platforms. Samardžić pointed out that the UGP has submitted analyses of proposed measures to the government, warning about potential consequences. He emphasized that these measures would not reduce inflation in Croatia, noting that the government labeled them anti-inflationary measures because they could not be called fiscal measures. He argued that increasing business costs would have the opposite effect, potentially discouraging entrepreneurship and pushing people away from self-employment.

Idi na primarne izvore (1)

Službeni izvori na kojima se izvještavanje temelji. Pročitaj ih izravno da zaobiđeš uokvirivanje.

7 izvještaja

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija) logoHRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)Državni / javniSredinaČinjenice 98Objektivnost 90prije 14 dana
Plenković o cijenama goriva: Naše mogućnosti su limitirane

Premijer Andrej Plenković potvrdio je da će cijene goriva u Hrvatskoj porasti sljedećeg tjedna zbog povećanih svjetskih cijena nafte uzrokovanih eskalacijom sukoba na Bliskom istoku i zatvaranjem Ormuškog moreuza.

Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku se izravno citira premijer Andrej Plenković, koji objašnjava razloge za očekivani porast cijena goriva i priznaje ograničenja vladinog djelovanja.

Zašto činjenice (98): The article provides an accurate summary of Prime Minister Plenković's comments on fuel price increases, citing his statement about limited options and the impact of geopolitical events. The information matches other reports and is well-supported.

Zašto objektivnost (90): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the prime minister's statements without editorializing or taking sides. It focuses on delivering the facts without bias.

Telegram.hr logoTelegram.hrNeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice 97Objektivnost 88prije 8 dana
Iz Fokusa odgovorili Plenkoviću: ‘Može, ukinimo mjere za gorivo, ali i poreze i trošarine’

Članovi stranke Fokus podržavaju prijedlog premijera Andreja Plenkovića o ukidanju dnevne kontrole cijena goriva, ali tvrde da bi to trebalo biti praćeno ukidanjem ili značajnim smanjenjem poreza i naknada na gorivo.

Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se poziva na ukidanje kontrole cijena goriva kao dio šire zahtjeva za smanjenom državnom intervencijom i nižim troškovima za potrošače.

Zašto činjenice (97): This article accurately conveys the Fokus party's response to Plenković's proposal, matching the content of article 3. It provides direct quotes and aligns with the cross-source consensus.

Zašto objektivnost (88): The article maintains a neutral tone overall but includes phrases like 'testirajmo koliko bi gorivo bilo jeftinije' (let's test how much cheaper fuel would be), which subtly emphasizes the Fokus party's perspective.

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaNeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice 97Objektivnost 88prije 8 dana
Fokusovo rješenje: Plenković treba ukinuti ili snažno smanjiti poreze i trošarine na gorivo

Članovi stranke Fokus podržavaju prijedlog premijera Andreja Plenkovića da se ukine vladina praksa određivanja cijena goriva svakih 14 dana. Oni tvrde da cijene goriva ne bi trebale ovisiti o političkim odlukama i pozivaju na ukidanje ili značajno smanjenje poreza i naknada na gorivo.

Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se pitanje postavlja kao zahtjev za smanjenjem vladine intervencije u cijene goriva i smanjenje poreza i naknada, što se poklapa s lijevo orijentiranim ekonomskim politikama koje zagovaraju slobodu tržišta i smanjenu državnu kontrolu.

Zašto činjenice (97): The article accurately summarizes the Fokus party's response to Plenković's proposal to remove fuel price controls, including their call to also reduce taxes and fees on fuel. This aligns with the content of article 4.

Zašto objektivnost (88): The article remains relatively neutral in tone while presenting the Fokus party's position. However, it does frame the issue as a test of the government's commitment to helping citizens, which slightly influences the narrative.

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija) logoHRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)Državni / javniProgresivnoČinjenice 95Objektivnost 85prije 8 dana
UGP: Pomoć gospodarstvu nije dar Vlade, nego obveza države

Hrvatsko poslovno udruženje Udruga Glas poduzetnika (UGP) odgovorilo je na nedavnu izjavu premijera Andreja Plenkovića o državnoj podršci poduzećima, tvrdeći da takva pomoć nije poklon od vlade, već dužnost države koju financiraju građani i poduzetnici putem poreza i doprinosa.

Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se UGP-ova kritika vladinih politika prikazuje kao poziv na odgovornost i pravičnost u oporezivanju, naglašavajući uočene nejednakosti u načinu na koji se tretiraju različiti regiji i vrste poduzeća.

Zašto činjenice (95): This article accurately reflects the UGP's response to Plenković's statements, mirroring the content of article 0. It provides detailed quotes and aligns with the cross-source consensus.

Zašto objektivnost (85): Similar to article 0, this piece presents the UGP's viewpoint with clear language and some emotionally charged terms like 'neprihvatljivo.' It supports the UGP's stance more than it balances it with opposing views.

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaNeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice 95Objektivnost 85prije 8 dana
UGP odgovorio premijeru: Pomoć gospodarstvu nije dar Vlade, nego obveza države koju svi plaćamo

Unija poduzetnika i poslovnih ljudi (UGP) odbacila je tvrdnju premijera Andreja Plenkovića da poduzetnici šute kada vlada ograničava cijene energije, ali govore samo kada moraju platiti više. U izjavi UGP je naglasio da sredstva koja se koriste za energetske intervencije dolaze iz poreza i doprinosa koje plaćaju građani, obrtnici i poduzetnici, a ne iz vladinog proračuna.

Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): Članak predstavlja kritičku perspektivu prema vladinim ekonomskim politikama, osobito u pogledu oporezivanja i energetskih subvencija.

Zašto činjenice (95): The article accurately reports the statements made by UGP regarding the government's energy interventions and their funding sources. It aligns closely with the content of other articles covering the same event, particularly those from HRT and Telegram.hr.

Zašto objektivnost (85): The article presents the UGP's perspective clearly but uses some emotionally charged language such as 'neprihvatljivo' (unacceptable) and frames the issue as a conflict between the government and entrepreneurs. While not overtly biased, it leans toward supporting the UGP's position.

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 90Objektivnost 80prije 10 dana
Šef UGP-a o kaznama za ugostitelje: Zar smo mi svi Al Capone?!

Bruno Samardžić, predsjednik Udruge Glas poduzetnika (UGP), u intervjuu s Ninom Kljenakom u "Novom danu" komentirao je prijedloge za ublažavanje poreznih obveza za paušalne obrtnike, ponašanje vlade prema malim poduzetnicima, antiinflacijske mjere, zahtjeve UGP-a za uključivanje u donošenje odluka, politiku kazni prema ugostiteljima i drugim poduzetnicima.

Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Intervju je bio neutralne prirode, fokusiran na objektivno objašnjenje stavova UGP-a i njihovog stava prema državnoj politici. Nema jasno izraženih stranih ili domaćih stavova u Izraelu, niti su bili izraženi nepravedni stavovi prema jednoj strani. Sadržaj je ostavljen na objašnjenju

Zašto činjenice (90): The article accurately reports on the UGP leader's comments regarding fines for hospitality businesses, though it lacks specific details compared to other articles. It aligns with the general sentiment expressed elsewhere.

Zašto objektivnost (80): The article uses rhetorical questions ('Zar smo mi svi Al Capone?!') and strong language, indicating a clear support for the UGP's position rather than maintaining strict neutrality.

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 90Objektivnost 80prije 10 dana
Šef UGP-a o kaznama za ugostitelje: Zar smo mi svi Al Capone?!

Predsjednik Udruge Glas poduzetnika (UGP) Bruno Samardžić komentirao je ublažavanje poreznih promjena za paušalne obrtnike, odnosno Vlade prema malim poduzetnicima, i zahtjeve UGP-a za uključivanje u donošenje odluka. Vlada je ublažila svoje nove izmjene u sklopu antiinflacijskog paketa, tako da će paušalne obrtnike s godišnjim prihodom do 40.000 eura nastojati da se ne povećaju davanja državi. Mjere trebaju biti upućene u javno savjetovanje, a njihova primjena predviđena je od 1. siječnja 2027. godine. Samardžić je naglasio potrebu uključivanja zaivanGP Ujem-a u proces donošenja odluka, tvrdeći da mali poduzetnici zastupljeni u javnosti imaju legitimitet. Također je istaknuo da UGP treba analizirati i predložiti mjere za upozoravanje o mogućim posljedicama.

Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja uravnoteženu raspravu između zahtjeva UGP-a za uključivanje u procese donošenja odluka i djelovanja vlade u vezi s poreznim promjenama.

Zašto činjenice (90): The article accurately covers the UGP leader's comments on fines for hospitality businesses and the government's proposed changes to tax policies for small business owners. It aligns with the general consensus found in other articles.

Zašto objektivnost (80): The article presents the UGP leader's perspective with strong language and rhetorical questions, showing a clear alignment with the UGP's stance rather than offering a balanced view.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Isti događaj, grupiran prema političkom nagibu medija koji su o njemu izvještavali.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.

Postani podupiratelj

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Isti događaj kako se o njemu izvještavalo u drugim zemljama.

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.

Postani podupiratelj

Provjera tvrdnji

Ključne činjenične tvrdnje i koliko ih izvora potvrđuje odn. osporava.

Provjera tvrdnji

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.

Postani podupiratelj

Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.

ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mjesec.

Postani podupiratelj

Povezane priče