ON
← Natrag na feed
Svi članovi UEFA-e su za bojkot FIFA-inih natjecanja! Razlog je prodaja vlasničkih prava privatnim investitorima
Croatia⚽ SportProgresivnojučer

Svi članovi UEFA-e su za bojkot FIFA-inih natjecanja! Razlog je prodaja vlasničkih prava privatnim investitorima

Europska nogometna asocijacija (UEFA) je objavila da su svih 55 nacionalnih udruženja članica jednoglasno odlučili bojkotirati sva natjecanja koja organizira FIFA, uključujući Svjetsko prvenstvo, ako FIFA nastavi prodavati prava emitiranja privatnim ulagačima. Odluka je donesena nakon što je UEFA kritizirala FIFA zbog tretiranja Svjetskog prvenstva kao investicijskog proizvoda, a ne kao kulturne i povijesne baštine izgrađene generacijama. UEFA tvrdi da Svjetsko prvenstvo ne bi trebalo biti prodano privatnim subjektima i osuđuje FIFA zbog donošenja tako značajnog prijedloga u tajnosti bez smislenog savjetovanja s onima koji su posvećeni nogometu.

The European football governing body, UEFA, has announced that all 55 of its member national associations have unanimously decided to boycott all tournaments under the jurisdiction of FIFA, including World Cups, unless FIFA halts its proposal to sell ownership stakes in major competitions to private investors. This decision comes after intense discussions among UEFA members, who expressed deep concern over FIFA's plans to introduce private equity into the management of international football events. According to UEFA’s official statement, the World Cup cannot be treated as an investment product. It is one of the greatest legacies of world football, built through generations of players, national teams, and fans across every continent. No part of it should ever be handed over to private investors. The World Cup is not for sale. UEFA emphasized that the proposal was conceived in secrecy and brought close to adoption without meaningful consultation with those entrusted with managing the game. This, they argued, represents not just a failure of leadership but an abandonment of FIFA’s duty as guardian of world football. National associations around the world are now faced with an ultimatum: accept the irreversible transfer of control over the largest football competitions or bear the consequences. UEFA described this as not a democratic decision but a form of coercion unworthy of an institution entrusted with managing global football. Their opposition goes beyond the process itself. Once external investors gain ownership shares in FIFA tournaments, football will change forever. Financial returns will become a permanent obligation, investor expectations will turn into daily pressure, and decisions regarding the international calendar, competition formats, and the future of football will no longer be made in the best interest of the game but in the best interest of shareholders. Such a model has no place in world football, UEFA stated. The future of football cannot be dictated by the expectations of those whose primary responsibility is to maximize financial profit. The interests of national associations, leagues, clubs, players, and fans must not be subordinated to investor interests. Football cannot mortgage its future for financial gain. Europe’s position is clear. It will never give legitimacy to such a model. No one has the moral authority to sell something entrusted solely to safeguarding it for future generations. As a result of today’s discussion, none of UEFA’s national teams will participate in any FIFA tournament while these proposals remain active, unless the proposal is completely withdrawn and FIFA provides binding assurances that it will never again open up its governance or competitions to private ownership. There are moments when institutions are judged not by what they are willing to accept but by what they refuse to compromise on. This is one such moment. Some things are simply too valuable to be sold. The World Cup belongs to football. It always has and it always will. As long as Europe has a voice, it will never be for sale, UEFA declared. The controversy began earlier this week when insider reports suggested that FIFA planned to sell between 20 and 30 percent of the stake in a new company that would take complete control of the World Cup. Those familiar with the situation called this move a “nuclear strike” on football. Preliminary agreements reportedly signed already carry an estimated value of around 17.5 billion euros. According to reports, FIFA President Gianni Infantino sent letters to all 211 member associations, offering 40 million dollars (35 million euros) to those who support his controversial plan to sell shares in major tournaments. A deadline of September 19 was set for associations to accept his plans if they wanted access to an initial 20 million dollars (17 million euros). UEFA responded swiftly, sending a clear message: “This crosses the line that governing football institutions should never cross. None of us is the owner of football. The World Cup is simply not FIFA’s property to sell.” From the beginning, it was evident that UEFA was unhappy with FIFA’s plans, particularly the fact that FIFA did not mention this controversial strategy during meetings with football associations in New York ahead of the World Cup final. Such a decision could trigger a cold war between two of the biggest football organizations, which have been in poor relations for some time. The situation escalated further when Infantino decided to lift the suspension of American player Folarin Balogun following a call from US President Donald Trump. UEFA President Aleksander Ceferin was not present at the final of this year’s World Cup, despite attending the opening ceremony earlier. Infantino’s election is scheduled for next year, and UEFA’s move could create a domino effect in which other associations around the world follow the European example. Regardless of what happens on that front, FIFA relies heavily on European teams for the success of the World Cup; Spain currently holds both men’s and women’s titles, giving them considerable power and making the threat of a boycott serious. In its official statement, UEFA reiterated that it and its 55 member associations stand united. They categorically reject FIFA’s proposal to transfer ownership shares in the World Cup and other FIFA tournaments to private investors. The World Cup cannot be treated as an investment product. It is one of the greatest sporting legacies of football. Built over generations by players, national teams, and fans across every continent, no part of it should ever be handed over to private investors. The World Cup is not for sale. It is irresponsible and unjustified that such a significant proposal for football was devised in secret and brought close to approval without any meaningful consultations with those entrusted with managing the game. This is not merely a failure of leadership but an abandonment of FIFA’s duty as guardian of world football. National associations around the world are now given an ultimatum: accept the irreversible transfer of control over the largest football competitions or bear the consequences. This is not a “democratic decision,” but a form of intimidation unworthy of an institution entrusted with managing global football. Their opposition extends far beyond the process itself. At the moment when external investors gain ownership shares in FIFA tournaments, football will change forever. Commercial returns will become a permanent obligation. Investor expectations will turn into daily pressure. From that point onward, every decision regarding the international calendar, competition formats, and the shaping of football’s future will no longer be made in the best interest of the game but in the best interest of shareholders.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Isti događaj, grupiran prema političkom nagibu medija koji su o njemu izvještavali.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Isti događaj kako se o njemu izvještavalo u drugim zemljama.

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

Provjera tvrdnji

Ključne činjenične tvrdnje i koliko ih izvora potvrđuje odn. osporava.

Provjera tvrdnji

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

Idi na primarne izvore (2)

Službeni izvori na kojima se izvještavanje temelji. Pročitaj ih izravno da zaobiđeš uokvirivanje.

5 izvještaja

Net.hr logoNet.hrNeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice 90Objektivnost 70prekjučer
Europske reprezentacije složne: 'Želite prodati SP? Ok, ali onda nas nema'

Europsko nogometno upravno tijelo, UEFA, snažno se protivi prijedlogu predsjednika FIFA-e Giannija Infantina o prodaji dionica Svjetskog prvenstva privatnim ulagačima. Na hitnom sastanku u kojem je sudjelovalo svih 55 udruga članica UEFA-e, jednoglasno su odbacili ideju, navodeći da se Svjetsko prvenstvo ne može tretirati kao investicijski proizvod. Naglasili su da je turnir globalna baština koju grade igrači, timovi i navijači na svim kontinentima i ne bi trebao biti prodan privatnim ulagačima.

Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se protivljenje UEFA-e prijedlogu FIFA-e prikazuje kao obrana integriteta nogometa i interesa nacionalnih momčadi, klubova i navijača protiv privatnih investitora.

Zašto činjenice (90): The article accurately reports the primary source's claims about UEFA's unanimous rejection of FIFA's proposal and the implications of the sale. It does not add unsubstantiated details.

Zašto objektivnost (70): The tone is more assertive and supportive of UEFA's position, using phrases like 'bolan udarac' to emphasize the severity of the situation. While factual, it shows a slight lean towards UEFA's perspective.

Novi list logoNovi listNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 90Objektivnost 55prekjučer
Svi članovi UEFA-e su za bojkot FIFA-inih natjecanja! Razlog je prodaja vlasničkih prava privatnim investitorima

Europska nogometna asocijacija (UEFA) je objavila da su svih 55 nacionalnih udruženja članica jednoglasno odlučili bojkotirati sva natjecanja koja organizira FIFA, uključujući Svjetsko prvenstvo, ako FIFA nastavi prodavati prava emitiranja privatnim ulagačima. Odluka je donesena nakon što je UEFA kritizirala FIFA zbog tretiranja Svjetskog prvenstva kao investicijskog proizvoda, a ne kao kulturne i povijesne baštine izgrađene generacijama. UEFA tvrdi da Svjetsko prvenstvo ne bi trebalo biti prodano privatnim subjektima i osuđuje FIFA zbog donošenja tako značajnog prijedloga u tajnosti bez smislenog savjetovanja s onima koji su posvećeni nogometu.

Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku se raspravlja o sportskom pitanju koji uključuje upravljanje međunarodnim nogometnim natjecanjima.

Zašto činjenice (90): This article accurately reflects the consensus among other reports by stating that UEFA has unanimously decided to boycott FIFA events if the sale of World Cup rights proceeds. It includes quotes from UEFA officials and outlines the financial implications of the proposed sale, aligning closely with

Zašto objektivnost (55): The article is highly biased in favor of UEFA’s position, using strong language such as 'abdication of duty,' 'undignified institution,' and 'threatening behavior.' It presents the decision as a moral imperative rather than a strategic choice, showing a clear ideological stance.

Net.hr logoNet.hrNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 85Objektivnost 70jučer
FIFA se oglasila, pronašli i krivca: 'Nitko ne prodaje nogomet'

Međunarodna nogometna federacija (FIFA) odgovorila je na kritike zbog svog prijedloga prodaje vlasničkih prava u nogometnim natjecanjima privatnim ulagačima. Nakon snažnog protivljenja europskih nogometnih saveza (UEFA) i Sjeverno- i Srednjoameričke i Karipske nogometne konfederacije (Concacaf), FIFA je izdala izjavu kojom je negirala navode o prodaji nogometa i tvrdila da inicijativa ima za cilj osigurati da sva udruženja članica imaju ulogu u komercijalnom razvoju bez narušavanja upravljanja FIFA. Prijedlog je odbacio svih 41 člana Concacafa, koji su izrazili zabrinutost zbog nedostatka transparentnosti i pravilnog procesa savjetovanja. Dok je UEFA zaprijetila bojkotom ako se prijedlog nastavi, Concacaf nije poduzeo takve ekstremne mjere.

Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku je predstavljen službeni stav FIFA-e bez otvorene naklonosti bilo kojoj strani.

Zašto činjenice (85): The article accurately reflects the primary source's claims about UEFA's rejection of FIFA's proposal and the denial of the sale. It includes some additional context about the media's role and the response from Concacaf.

Zašto objektivnost (70): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting the facts without overt emotional appeal. However, it emphasizes the controversy surrounding the proposal and the strong opposition from UEFA and other organizations.

Jutarnji list logoJutarnji listNeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice 85Objektivnost 65prekjučer
Povijesni šamar Infantinu: UEFA najavila bojkot Svjetskog prvenstva, cijela Europa ujedinjena!

U članku se izvještava o značajnom sukobu između UEFA-e i FIFA-e zbog prijedloga UEFA-e da proda dionice Svjetskog prvenstva privatnim investitorima. Prema BBC-u, svih 55 članica UEFA-e glasalo je za bojkot Svjetskog prvenstva kao protest protiv planova FIFA-e. Prijedlog uključuje prodaju između 20% i 30% udjela FIFA-e u velikim turnirima, s preliminarnim sporazumima vrijednim oko 17,5 milijardi eura. Predsjednik Gianni Infantino ponudio je financijske poticaje kako bi osigurao podršku za svoj plan, ali ga je UEFA odbila, nazivajući taj potez neprihvatljivim i naglašavajući da Svjetsko prvenstvo nije roba koja se može prodati. Spor je eskalirao napetosti između dvije organizacije, pri čemu je UEFA zaprijetila potencijalnim ekstremnim mjerama ako FIFA ne promijeni kurs.

Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se sukob prikazuje kao načelno stajalište UEFA-e protiv komercijalizacije nogometa od strane FIFA-e, koristeći snažan jezik poput "nuklearnog udara" i "ekstremnih mjera". Naglašava se ujedinjeno protivljenje UEFA-e i prikazuje postupke FIFA-e kao eksploatacijske i nedemokratske.

Zašto činjenice (85): The article accurately reports the primary source's claims about UEFA's rejection of FIFA's proposal and the potential financial incentives for Infantino. It includes some details not directly stated in the primary source, such as the timeline for acceptance.

Zašto objektivnost (65): The article takes a strongly supportive stance towards UEFA and frames the situation as a direct confrontation between UEFA and FIFA. It uses emotive language and shows a clear bias towards UEFA.

Večernji list logoVečernji listNeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice 85Objektivnost 60prekjučer
Uefa poslala poruku svijetu: Nećemo tolerirati ovo što Fifa radi, pozicija Europe je jasna

UEFA je izdala snažnu izjavu protiv FIFA-inog prijedloga za prodaju prava na emitiranje privatnim investitorima, tvrdeći da Svjetsko prvenstvo pripada nogometu i ne može se tretirati kao investicijski proizvod.

Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se ovaj problem prikazuje kao moralni i institucionalni sukob između UEFA-e i FIFA-e, naglašavajući zaštitu integriteta nogometa i demokratski proces.

Zašto činjenice (85): The article accurately reports the details of the proposed sale, including the formation of FIFA Forward Enterprises, the amount of money involved, and the incentives offered to national associations. It aligns closely with the UEFA statement and provides specific figures and names. However, it does

Zašto objektivnost (60): The tone is more aligned with the UEFA's perspective, presenting the proposal as a controversial and potentially damaging move. It emphasizes the financial incentives and the potential consequences of rejection, while downplaying the ethical arguments. The language is more confrontational and less b

Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.

ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.

Postani podupiratelj

Povezane priče