The latest poll conducted by the Economist /YouGov reveals a stark divide in how Democrats view the United States compared to other nations. According to the findings, only 8 percent of Democrats consider America the “greatest” country on Earth, a sharp contrast to the 52 percent of Republicans who share that sentiment. The survey, carried out between June 19 and 22, 2026, included responses from 1,679 participants, and it comes ahead of the nation’s semiquincentennial celebration and the opening of the Great American State Fair on the National Mall. The data highlights a growing sense of disillusionment among some Democrats regarding national identity and pride, with a significant portion of respondents expressing skepticism about the country’s standing globally.
Among the surveyed groups, opinions varied widely. While 25 percent of all respondents believed the U.S. was “the greatest” country, 20 percent considered it “among the greatest,” and 12 percent deemed it “better than average.” Conversely, 12 percent thought the country was “worse than average,” with 9 percent describing it as “among the worst” and 4 percent as “the worst.” These figures underscore a complex landscape of national perception, influenced by political affiliation and personal experiences. Notably, a plurality of Democrats, 23 percent, viewed the U.S. negatively, indicating a potential shift in how certain segments of the population perceive the nation’s global role and values.
The survey also revealed notable differences among political ideologies and voter preferences. Among self-described liberals, 26 percent expressed that the U.S. was “worse than average,” whereas 53 percent of conservatives held the opposite view. Furthermore, the poll highlighted a disparity between supporters of different presidential candidates. Voters who had supported Kamala Harris in the 2024 election showed a higher percentage of those who saw the U.S. as “worse than average” compared to Trump supporters, who overwhelmingly identified the country as “the greatest.” This suggests that political alignment significantly influences perceptions of national greatness.
Political figures and commentators have responded to these findings, emphasizing the importance of addressing the sentiments reflected in the poll. Senator David McCormick, a Republican from Pennsylvania, has called for action to challenge Democratic views on issues that resonate broadly with the American public. He advocates for measures that force Democrats to confront positions that are generally accepted across political lines, suggesting that such efforts might help bridge the gap in national pride and unity.
Meanwhile, the ongoing political landscape shows signs of polarization and strategic maneuvering. As the 2026 primary season progresses, Republicans continue to favor candidates aligned with the MAGA movement, despite concerns about its appeal to a broader electorate. Democrats, on the other hand, remain divided on strategies for electoral success, with varying levels of support for candidates ranging from centrist figures to progressive voices. This divergence underscores the challenges each party faces in crafting a unified message that resonates with the electorate.
Additionally, the debate over foreign policy continues to influence both parties, with divisions over issues such as the relationship with Israel and Iran creating internal tensions. These discussions highlight the complexities of maintaining national cohesion amid differing viewpoints and priorities.
As the nation approaches pivotal moments in its political calendar, the interplay between public sentiment, political strategy, and national identity will likely shape the trajectory of upcoming elections and policy decisions. The findings from this poll serve as a reminder of the evolving nature of American identity and the challenges faced by leaders in navigating a fragmented political landscape.
9 izvještaja
Breitbart NewsNeovisanDesnoČinjenice 95Objektivnost 80prije 5 danaSenator David McCormick, republikanac iz Pennsylvanije, naglasio je hitnost donošenja Zakona o SAVE Americi tijekom intervjua u emisiji 'The Alex Marlow Show'.
Procjena pristranosti (Desno): U članku se upotrebljava snažan, emocionalno napunjen jezik kao što je "naći demokrate da jedu ovo" i uokviruje zakonodavstvo kao nužnu mjeru kako bi se demokrate prisilile da brane kontroverzni stav.
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 95 · Objektivnost 80): The article accurately reports Senator McCormick's statements about the SAVE America Act. It maintains a relatively neutral tone while presenting his perspective.
RealClearPoliticsNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 90Objektivnost 85jučerThe upcoming Senate elections in November are shaping up to be highly competitive, with Republicans currently holding an advantage or closely contesting the key states that are vital for Democratic victories. This suggests that the outcome of the election could hinge on a narrow margin in these critical regions. The battle for control of the Senate is likely to be intense, with both parties focusing their efforts on winning these pivotal states. The current polling indicates a tight race, which could lead to significant implications for the balance of power in Congress.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): The article presents a neutral observation about the current state of the Senate races without overtly favoring either party. It notes the competitiveness of the races but does not employ biased language or selectively present information to support one side over the other.
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 90 · Objektivnost 85): The article provides factual information about the current state of Senate races. It is neutral in tone and does not take sides in the political debate.
The New York Times (US)Neovisan🔒SredinaČinjenice 90Objektivnost 85prije 4 danaU članku se raspravlja o rastućim unutarnjim podjelama unutar Demokratske i Republikanske stranke u Sjedinjenim Državama o pitanjima vanjske politike, posebice u vezi s Izraelom i Iranom. Ove rasprave smatraju se da imaju značajne implikacije na učinak stranaka na nadolazećim izborima, uključujući predsjedničke izbore 2028.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja uravnotežen pogled na unutarnju raspravu unutar obje glavne političke stranke bez otvorene favoriziranja jedne strane.
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 90 · Objektivnost 85): The article explores the division between Democrats and Republicans regarding Israel and Iran. It presents the situation objectively without taking sides.
PoliticoNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 90Objektivnost 80prije 5 danaRepublikanci se bore s unutarnjim podjelama oko strategije i izbora kandidata. Republikanci izlaze kandidate koji se snažno slažu s Trumpovom ideologijom, dok demokrate biraju između postavljenih likova i progresivnih izazivača.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja uravnotežen pogled na strategije i izazove obje stranke bez otvorene favoriziranja jedne strane.
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 90 · Objektivnost 80): The article provides a balanced overview of the primary season, discussing both Republican and Democratic strategies. It remains objective in its analysis.
CBS News (US)NeovisanDesnoČinjenice 85Objektivnost 80prije 12 hGodinu dana nakon što je predsjednik Trump potpisao "Zakon o jednom velikom lijepom zakonu" (OBBBA), učinci zakona na različite skupine postaju sve jasniji. OBBBA je produžio porezne rezove iz Zakona o poreznim rezovima i radnim mjestima iz 2017. godine, čuvajući najveću pojedinačnu poreznu stopu od 37% za osobe s visokim prihodima, što je korisno za one koji zarađuju više od 640.000 dolara pojedinačno ili 768.000 dolara zajednički. Također je smanjio savezne izdatke za programe poput Medicaida i bonova za hranu za financiranje tih poreznih rezova. Dok republikanci pohvaljuju zakon za ekonomsko olakšanje i dugoročni rast, demokrate tvrde da neproporcionalno koristi bogatima smanjenjem potpore za ranjivo stanovništvo. Analiza ističe različite utjecaje na temelju prihoda, dobi i ovisnosti o saveznoj pomoći, a neke odredbe stupaju na snagu kasnije 2026. godine.
Procjena pristranosti (Desno): Članak prikazuje OBBBA kao korisnu za porezne obveznike srednje klase i naglašava republikanske tvrdnje o ekonomskom olakšanju i dugoročnom rastu.
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 85 · Objektivnost 80): The article discusses the impact of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act on different groups. It presents both Republican and Democratic perspectives fairly.
The HillNeovisanLijevoČinjenice 85Objektivnost 80jučerPlanned Parenthood će nastaviti primati savezno financiranje kroz Medicaid počevši od ove subote, nakon isteka republikanskog napora da blokira takvo financiranje. Prošle godine, republikanci su koristili Zakon o jednom velikom lijepom zakonu kako bi prekinuli pristup Planned Parenthood-u sredstvima za Medicaid, potez koji je imao za cilj sprečiti organizaciju da koristi savezni novac za usluge pobačaja.
Procjena pristranosti (Lijevo): Članak opisuje nastavak federalnog financiranja za Planned Parenthood kao pozitivan razvoj događaja, ističući prethodne republikanske akcije kao "dugo traženi cilj" konzervativaca da "definanciraju" organizaciju.
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 85 · Objektivnost 80): The article reports on Planned Parenthood regaining federal funding. It provides factual information and remains neutral in its presentation.
Breitbart NewsNeovisanDesnoČinjenice 80Objektivnost 65prije 4 dana Anketa: Samo 8 posto demokrata smatra Ameriku 'najvećom' zemljom na ZemljiNedavno istraživanje koje je proveo The Economist/YouGov otkriva značajne razlike u tome kako Amerikanci doživljavaju položaj svoje zemlje na globalnom nivou, osobito po strankarskim linijama. Samo 8% demokrata smatra Sjedinjene Države 'najvećom' zemljom na Zemlji, dok 52% republikanaca drži to gledište. Istraživanje ukazuje na to da većina u svim skupinama vjeruje da su SAD barem bolje od prosjeka, ali mišljenja se oštro razlikuju između političkih stranaka. Među demokratama, 23% opisuje SAD kao 'gore od prosjeka', a 15% kaže da je 'među najgorim'. Nasuprot tome, 53% konzervativaca ocjenjuje SAD kao 'najveću' zemlju. Rezultati se poklapaju s proslavama 250. godišnjice Amerike i početkom Velikog američkog državnog sajma.
Procjena pristranosti (Desno): Članak naglašava snažan kontrast između republikanskih i demokratskih pogleda na nacionalni ponos, naglašavajući nizak postotak demokrata koji vide SAD kao "najveću" zemlju.
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 80 · Objektivnost 65): The article reports on a poll showing Democrats' perception of America. While it presents the data accurately, the framing emphasizes negative aspects of Democratic sentiment.
Breitbart NewsNeovisanDesnoČinjenice 75Objektivnost 50jučer Donny Deutsch: 'Democrats Have Gone off the Rails'On Thursday's episode of MS NOW's 'Money, Power, Politics,' panelist Donny Deutsch criticized Democrats for promoting 'anti-American socialism' and failing to address economic concerns. Host Stephanie Ruhle asked whether voter dissatisfaction with Trump could shift support toward Democrats if the economy does not improve before November. Deutsch argued that Democrats are out of touch with mainstream values, focusing instead on issues like anti-Semitism and socialism. He cited recent Democratic candidates who allegedly supported pro-Hamas rhetoric and called for abolishing institutions such as ICE and prisons. Deutsch warned that these positions could harm the Democratic Party by giving Republicans ammunition to attack them.
Procjena pristranosti (Desno): The article frames Democrats as extreme and out-of-touch, using loaded terms like 'anti-American socialism' and 'socialistic' to describe their policies. It emphasizes the potential negative impact of these views on Democratic electoral prospects, suggesting a right-leaning perspective. The focus on
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 75 · Objektivnost 50): The article accurately quotes Donny Deutsch's comments about Democrats going off the rails, but presents his views without sufficient balance or context. The tone leans heavily toward conservative criticism of Democrats.
SemaforNeovisanDesnoČinjenice 60Objektivnost 40jučerThe article reports that Republican lawmakers are planning strategies to resist investigations led by Democratic authorities. The focus is on efforts to counterprobe actions initiated by Democrats, suggesting potential legislative or procedural responses aimed at limiting the scope or impact of these inquiries.
Procjena pristranosti (Desno): The article frames Republican actions as proactive measures against Democratic investigations, implying a defensive stance. The emphasis on 'plot' suggests a narrative that portrays Republicans as actively working to undermine Democratic oversight, which aligns with a right-leaning perspective.
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 60 · Objektivnost 40): The article makes a claim about Republican plotting against Democrat probes but lacks specific evidence or sources. The tone suggests a particular political bias.
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.
Postani podupiratelj
United States
