ON
← Natrag na feed
Stanovnicima je zabranjeno da instaliraju solarne ploče od 600 funti.
United Kingdom🏛️ PolitikaSredinaprije 11 h

Stanovnicima je zabranjeno da instaliraju solarne ploče od 600 funti.

The iPaper izvještava da vlasnici kuća u Velikoj Britaniji mogu zakonski blokirati stanare od instalacije priključnih solarnih panela zbog nejasnih pravila planiranja. Novi propisi koje je uvela vlada klasificiraju ove solarne pakete kao 'dozvoljeni razvoj', što znači da obično ne zahtijevaju planiranje dozvole. Međutim, postoje iznimke, kao što su instalacije na drvenim zidovima, balkonima ili drvenim zgradama, koje zahtijevaju odobrenje. Iako vlada potiče vlasnike kuća da povoljno razmotre zahtjeve stanara, Nacionalno udruženje stanara (NRLA) tvrdi da nema jasnih smjernica za vlasnike kuća, koji mogu odbiti instalaciju zbog sigurnosnih problema ili pitanja osiguranja.

Renters in England face potential barriers to installing plug-in solar panels due to uncertainties surrounding planning rules and landlord approval, according to reports. The issue has sparked calls for clearer legal guidelines to enable tenants to reduce their energy costs significantly. The first batch of self-install solar kits became available last week for £699, following new government compliance standards. Retailers anticipate prices dropping below £600 as more companies begin offering these renewable energy solutions. A model priced at £599 is expected to launch in October. The initial compliant plug-in solar kits produced by UK-based company UKsol are intended for installation in gardens, rather than being attached to balconies. Balcony-specific models are anticipated to enter the market shortly, catering to renters living in apartments who previously found it difficult to benefit from conventional rooftop solar systems. However, a prominent housing association has already prohibited its tenants from installing such devices. Government officials have emphasized that the final decision regarding tenant applications for plug-in solar installations lies with the landlords. Officials have communicated to the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) that they expect these new solar kits to be viewed positively. Climate minister Katie White had previously indicated that the government might consider legal modifications if plug-in solar technology creates friction between tenants and landlords. However, energy minister Martin McCluskey recently stated that he does not foresee the necessity for additional legislation. Katie White visited the UKsol factory to inspect components of the new plug-in solar kits. Prices are projected to fall beneath £600 as more retailers stock these domestic renewable energy devices (Photo: DESNZ) Despite this, the NRLA informed The i Paper that there is currently no definitive guidance for landlords tasked with ensuring the safety and hazard-free status of their properties. Meera Chindooroy, the NRLA's deputy director of campaigns, stressed the urgency for the government to release this information promptly to facilitate discussions between tenants and landlords. Landlords may refuse requests citing insurance concerns, as per recent rule amendments effective from 27 August. These changes classify plug-in solar kits as "permitted development," typically exempt from requiring planning consent. Nevertheless, several exceptions exist. Planning permission is mandatory for installations on wooden walls, balconies, enclosures, or any section of the exterior of a block of flats clad in timber. Additionally, specific "protrusion" limitations apply, such as restrictions preventing panels from extending more than 0.4 meters beyond the wall surface, to avoid needing planning permission. Justin Dring, an expert at Independent Solar Consultants advising property owners, believes many landlords might still decline plug-in solar panels. He noted that landlords often raise insurance-related concerns, driven by uncertainties about whether tenants will install the devices correctly or adhere to planning regulations. Dring remarked to The i Paper that landlords might respond with, "You're not plugging that in on my property." When considering insurance, questions arise concerning liability if a panel detaches during a storm, damages neighboring property, or causes an electrical malfunction. This area remains largely uncharted, creating a complex and ambiguous scenario. Dring described the situation as a "minefield," noting that if complications arise, blame could be assigned to multiple parties. He suggested that it would be preferable for the government to establish comprehensive regulations outlining requirements and responsibilities.

Idi na primarne izvore (1)

Službeni izvori na kojima se izvještavanje temelji. Pročitaj ih izravno da zaobiđeš uokvirivanje.

1 izvještaja

iNews logoiNewsNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 85Objektivnost 65prije 11 h
Stanovnicima je zabranjeno da instaliraju solarne ploče od 600 funti.

The iPaper izvještava da vlasnici kuća u Velikoj Britaniji mogu zakonski blokirati stanare od instalacije priključnih solarnih panela zbog nejasnih pravila planiranja. Novi propisi koje je uvela vlada klasificiraju ove solarne pakete kao 'dozvoljeni razvoj', što znači da obično ne zahtijevaju planiranje dozvole. Međutim, postoje iznimke, kao što su instalacije na drvenim zidovima, balkonima ili drvenim zgradama, koje zahtijevaju odobrenje. Iako vlada potiče vlasnike kuća da povoljno razmotre zahtjeve stanara, Nacionalno udruženje stanara (NRLA) tvrdi da nema jasnih smjernica za vlasnike kuća, koji mogu odbiti instalaciju zbog sigurnosnih problema ili pitanja osiguranja.

Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku se iznosi uravnotežen pogled na to pitanje, naglašavajući kako poticanje vlade da vlasnici zemljišta odobre instalacije, tako i kritiku NRLA-e zbog nedostatka jasnoće.

Zašto činjenice (85): The article accurately reports on the availability of plug-in solar kits and mentions government actions regarding product compliance. It references the NRLA and quotes officials like Katie White and Martin McCluskey, aligning with the primary source document's context about permitted development ru

Zašto objektivnost (65): The article presents information from multiple sources but frames the issue through the lens of tenant concerns and landlord responsibilities. It uses phrases like 'messy minefield' and 'struggled to benefit' which introduce some subjective language. The tone leans towards highlighting tenant challe

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Isti događaj, grupiran prema političkom nagibu medija koji su o njemu izvještavali.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.

Postani podupiratelj

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Isti događaj kako se o njemu izvještavalo u drugim zemljama.

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.

Postani podupiratelj

Provjera tvrdnji

Ključne činjenične tvrdnje i koliko ih izvora potvrđuje odn. osporava.

Provjera tvrdnji

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.

Postani podupiratelj

Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.

ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mjesec.

Postani podupiratelj

Povezane priče