N1 SrbijaNeovisanLijevoČinjenice 85Objektivnost 60prije 4 danaPredsednik Srbije Aleksandar Vučić tvrdio je suprotno. Predsednik Srbije Aleksandar Vučić i njegova ekipa više puta su se borili oko toga, a ministar unutrašnjih poslova Branko Đuričić naredio blokiranje određenog načina uređenja uređaja nakon 15. ožujka. Više javnog tužilaštva moglo je negodovati nad javnim nervom nad ciljnim postavljanjem javnog tužitelja od strane stranog političara, navodeći da je potrebno podizanje panike o tvrdom zvučniku.
Procjena pristranosti (Lijevo): Članak predstavlja optužbe protiv javnog tužitelja od strane političke ličnosti, dovodeći u pitanje zakonitost radnji poduzetih po njegovom nalogu i osporavajući službenu narativu o korištenju zvučnog topova.
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 85 · Objektivnost 60): The article presents Ponoš’s allegations against the Public Prosecutor Vladimir Živković and mentions specific legal provisions (Article 43). It references a claimed monopoly on truth by Vučić and questions the use of sound cannons, but lacks direct evidence or primary sources. The tone suggests pol
N1 SrbijaNeovisanLijevoČinjenice 75Objektivnost 55prije 3 dana VJT "najoštrije nezadovoljstvo" kada Ponos otkrije ime tužitelja, ali šuti kada iskaz završi u InformeruThe article discusses the actions of the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office (VJT) in Serbia regarding the case involving the use of a sound cannon during a protest. The focus is on the interrogation of Zdravko Ponoš, leader of the Srbija Centar party, who was questioned about his presence at the protest. The VJT strongly criticized Ponoš for publicly naming the prosecutor involved in the case, but did not react similarly when the content of the interrogation was later broadcast by the Informer tabloid. Ponoš accused the prosecutor Vladimir Živković of legal violations for allowing police officers to provide a statement about their conversation with him to the Informer shortly after he signed it. The VJT has been increasingly critical of various claims made about its work over the past year, particularly those related to the 'sound cannon' case, which led to a series of interrogations.
Procjena pristranosti (Lijevo): The article frames the VJT's actions as politically motivated, suggesting they are being used for political purposes. It highlights criticism from Ponoš against the prosecutors and implies that the VJT is acting selectively, criticizing Ponoš for revealing the prosecutor's identity but remaining unv
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 75 · Objektivnost 55): This article reports on the public prosecutor’s response to Ponoš’s statements, highlighting perceived politicization of the case. While it includes quotes from both sides, it frames the situation as an attempt by the prosecutor to counter political influence, introducing potential bias.
Serbia
