La pm: 'Normale che un uomo deve vincere un po' di resistenza per il sesso'. Condanna dell'Europa
The European Court of Human Rights has condemned Italy over its handling of a domestic violence case involving a French woman and her two children. The court ruled that the judicial process was too slow, inadequate, and ineffective, failing to meet the standards set by the Convention. The public prosecutor, referred to as 'la pm,' had requested the closure of the case with sexist and stereotypical reasoning, suggesting that men naturally encounter resistance during sexual encounters. The court criticized these remarks as reflecting a sexist and stereotypical mindset, which could further victimize women in court. Following objections from the woman, the request was rejected, leading to additional investigations. The Italian authorities were found to have failed to adequately address the severity of the allegations. As a result, the state must pay €15,000 in moral damages to the woman and her children, plus €15,000 for legal expenses. The woman, Audrey Ubeda, described the ruling as a turning point and a victory for all women.
Kako je izvijestila svaka strana
Isti događaj, grupiran prema političkom nagibu medija koji su o njemu izvještavali.
lijevo
sredina
desno
★
Kako je izvijestila svaka strana
Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.
In 2021, a prosecutor in Benevento requested the dismissal of a domestic violence case against a man, citing the idea that men might need to overcome a woman’s resistance during sexual encounters, which was later revealed by Il Fatto Quotidiano. This statement led to a European Court of Human Rights (Cedu) ruling that condemned Italy for failing to properly handle the case, violating the rights to privacy and protection from inhumane treatment under the European Convention on Human Rights. The victim, Audrey Ubeda, along with her two children, has been awarded €15,000 each in compensation. The court criticized the prosecutor's sexist and stereotypical remarks, noting they contributed to the normalization of domestic violence and secondary victimization of survivors. The judges emphasized that Italian authorities failed to recognize the complex mechanisms of domestic abuse and did not make serious efforts to understand the complainants' situation.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): The article presents the court's findings and criticisms objectively, quoting the Cedu's statements and the concerns raised by the Council of Europe's expert group. It does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing but rather reports on the legal and social implications of the case.
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 85 · Objektivnost 70): The article accurately reports the European Court of Human Rights ruling against Italy over the sexist remarks by a prosecutor. It provides details about the case, including the victim’s background and the financial penalties. However, the tone leans slightly towards criticizing Italian judicial pra
The European Court of Human Rights has condemned Italy over its handling of a domestic violence case involving a French woman and her two children. The court ruled that the judicial process was too slow, inadequate, and ineffective, failing to meet the standards set by the Convention. The public prosecutor, referred to as 'la pm,' had requested the closure of the case with sexist and stereotypical reasoning, suggesting that men naturally encounter resistance during sexual encounters. The court criticized these remarks as reflecting a sexist and stereotypical mindset, which could further victimize women in court. Following objections from the woman, the request was rejected, leading to additional investigations. The Italian authorities were found to have failed to adequately address the severity of the allegations. As a result, the state must pay €15,000 in moral damages to the woman and her children, plus €15,000 for legal expenses. The woman, Audrey Ubeda, described the ruling as a turning point and a victory for all women.
Procjena pristranosti (Lijevo): The article frames the issue as a systemic failure within the Italian justice system, highlighting sexist attitudes among prosecutors and the broader implications for victims of domestic violence. While the subject involves legal procedures, the emphasis on gender-based discrimination and the call-f
Europski sud za ljudska prava osudio je talijanski pravosudni sustav zbog nedostatka adekvatne zaštite žene optužene za nasilje u obitelji i njezinih dvoje djece. Sud je kritizirao kako postupanje s slučajem, tako i specifične primjedbe tužitelja tijekom istrage. Slučaj uključuje Audrey Carmen Manuela Ubeda, francusku državljanku koja živi u Italiji, koja je izvijestila o ponovljenom fizičkom i psihološkom zlostavljanju od strane svog bivšeg partnera, oca njezinih dvoje djece. Nakon njenog izvještaja u travnju 2021. godine, ona i njezina djeca smješteni su u zaštićenom skloništu više od tri godine do srpnja 2024. Sud je istaknuo da su komentari tužitelja, koji su se odnosili na otpor navodne žrtve kao na "normalni", odražavali seksističke stereotipe i pridonijeli sekundarnoj viktimizaciji. Presuda je također istaknula da su vlasti djelovale brzo, ali da ukupna istraga nije ispunila međunarodne standarde za rješavanje pitanja nasilja u obitelji.
Procjena pristranosti (Lijevo): U članku se kritika talijanskog pravosudnog sustava prikazuje kao šire pitanje diskriminacije na temelju spola i institucionalnog neuspjeha u zaštiti žena.
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.
Italy
