Po napačni diagnozi ostala brez maternice, bolnišnica priznala odgovornost
Razgovor s tridesetogodišnjakinjom koja je zbog pogrešne dijagnoze izgubila zdravlje majke postao je središnji element ozbiljnog problema u austrijskom zdravstvenom sustavu. Njena povijest pokazuje kompleksnu interakciju s zdravstvenom službom, koja također ima moralne implikacije. Povzetek njezinih iskustava uključuje šok zbog dijagnoze raka, brzu odluku o operaciji, iznenađujuću otkriću da je bilo sve što se moglo smanjiti na pogrešnom uzorku tkiva.
Vzrok za je bil videnje zdravnika, koji su se tako usredotočili na dijagnozu raka, umesto da se tako spriječili vzorec unutar bolnice.
Napaka je bila zazdana šele po operaciji, ko so zdravstveni zaposleniki ugotovili, da je maternica zdrava. To je vodilo do zaprositve za preiskavu državnega tožilstva, nato še neuspešnih pogađanja o poravnavi u pripravi na sudni postupak. Medtem ko je bolnišnica v Linzu, Univerzitetna bolnišnica Kepler, priznala odgovornost, je to pomenilo, da v sodnem postopku ne bo potreba dokazovati, ali je bila napaka posledica napake bolnišnice ali zgolj nesrečno spleta okoliščin. To je bilo tudi potrjeno z novim generalnim direktorjem bolnišnice, profesorom Meinhardom Lukasom, ki je željeziljo, da se pacijentiki ne bo potrebno večno sećati s tim pitanjima.
Prepoznal je, da je napake došao unutar ustanove, iako dugo prije njegovog nastupa.
Odšteta, koju je primila pacijentica, bila je 70.000 eura, a temeljila se na procjeni Združenja pacijenata u pregovorima u Gornjoj Austriji. Unatoč tome, slučaj još nije zaključen, jer je odvjetnik oštećene žene, Rainer Hable, to poravnavo zavrnil. Bolnišnica je predlagala imenovanje zajedničkog izabranog sudskog izvedenca, za početak tako da je predlagali tri, ali će se podijeliti i kandidati, koji će biti predlagani odvjetniku. Izvedensko mnenje naj bi predstavljalo podlago za izvensodno poravnavo. Po besedah direktorja bolnišnice bo troškove izvedencev krila bolnišnica.
Posebno je važno uzeti u obzir drugi dio ponude, gdje bolnica namjerava prihvatiti odgovornost ne samo za trenutno poznate posljedice operacije, već i za sve dodatne zdravstvene, psihičke ili financijske posljedice koje pacijent može doživjeti u budućnosti.
Govori, pravni zastupnik 30-godišnja žena, je ponuda odvjetnika Univerzitetne bolnice Kepler prejel v torek. O njoj se želi detaljno razgovarati sa svojom strankom, ali se za sada ne želi definirati do svebine ponuda. V pogovoru za časnik Krone je pojasnio, da moraju biti prvo razkrštene sve činjenice. "Prvo od svega moram osigurati, da se nešto nikada više ne dogodi drugoj ženi. To je bilo moje stranke važno že od trenutka, ko sam javno govorila o svom iskustvu. Takrat ni misli nase, ali na sve druge žene".
2 izvještaja
24ur (POP TV)NeovisanSredinaČinjenice 85Objektivnost 70prije 3 danaA 30-year-old woman was incorrectly diagnosed with a highly aggressive tumor at the University Hospital Kepler in Ljubljana, leading to the unnecessary removal of her uterus, both fallopian tubes, and one ovary. The error was discovered after the tissue sample was found to be contaminated, meaning there was no medical justification for the surgery. The patient has experienced significant psychological distress due to the fear of dying from cancer. Following the discovery of the mistake, a state prosecutor's investigation was launched, followed by unsuccessful negotiations for compensation and preparation for legal proceedings. The hospital eventually admitted responsibility, which could affect the outcome of any legal case. The hospital offered €70,000 in compensation, but the victim’s lawyer rejected the offer. The hospital now proposes a joint selection of an expert witness, with costs covered by the hospital, and intends to take responsibility for all future health, psychological, and financial consequences the patient might face.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): The article presents a factual account of a medical misdiagnosis and its consequences without overtly favoring either the hospital or the patient. While the issue involves institutional accountability and potential legal implications, the framing remains balanced, focusing on the facts rather than a
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 85 · Objektivnost 70): The article accurately reports the sequence of events including the initial diagnosis, the operation, and the subsequent discovery of contamination. It aligns with the cross-source consensus regarding the hospital's admission of responsibility. However, the emotional quotes from the patient may intr
Slovenske noviceNeovisanSredinaprekjučerIn August of last year, a 30-year-old woman had her healthy uterus removed at the University Hospital Kepler (KUK) in Austria after tissue samples indicated aggressive cancer. However, after the operation, it was discovered that the tissue sample had been contaminated, leading to the incorrect diagnosis. The hospital apologized for the error and now wishes to pay additional compensation to the patient, despite already paying 70,000 euros based on an assessment by a patient advocacy group. The patient described the experience as psychologically traumatic, stating she believed she would die for nearly two months. The hospital director explained that the decision to remove the uterus was made due to suspicions of cancer supported by imaging tests. Authorities are still investigating how the contamination occurred.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): The article presents the situation factually, quoting both the hospital and the patient's lawyer without overtly favoring either side. It does not use emotionally charged language or selectively omit information to support a particular viewpoint. The focus is on the medical error and subsequent redr
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.
Postani podupiratelj
Slovenia
