Sabor Hrvatske, u petak, odbio je prijedlog kluba Možemo! o osnivanju istražnog povjerenstva za slučaj Medikol, što je izazvalo duboku raspravu i izrazito napete situacije unutar parlamenta. Prijedlog, koji je bio podržan i nekim zastupnicima SDP-a, tražio je da se utvrdi poslovanje privatne poliklinike Medikol s Hrvatskim zavodom za zdravstveno osiguranje (HZZO) te da se ispitaju moguće nezakonitosti u ugovaranju i financiranju dijagnostičkih usluga, posebno PET/CT pretragama, koje se financiraju iz državnog proračuna. Sabor je glasovao za 83 zastupnika odbio je prijedlog, koji je podržan 40 zastupnika.
Odbijanje je bilo izazvano izrazitim protivstavom iz HDZ-a, koji je smatran istražnim povjerenstvom bilo "stranačka policija za rad s neistomišljenicima".
Ivana Kekin, predstavnica Možemo!, uoči glasanja najavila je da će svu prikupljenu dokumentaciju o medicinskim školama dati Državnom odvjetništvu (DORH). Ona je naglasila da je njihov zadatak zaštititi javni interes, a da je ključni problem u tome da Hrvatska gotovo 20 godina nije osigurala ključnu dijagnostiku za onkološke bolesti, dok je država plaćala milijun dolara odbranom privatnim akterima. Kekin je također istakla da je Medicol uključen u poslovne prostore u javnim bolnicama, uključujući KBC Rijeka, bez provedenog javnog natječaja, i da je uključen u nezakonite ugovaranje s Ministarstvom zdravlja.
Reakcija HDZ-a bila je izrazita. Predstavnici stranke pozvali su građane da prijave bilo kakve sumnje o nezakonitim radnjama, a ne da se upute istražnoj komisiji. HDZ je smatrao da je odbijanje prijedloga potrebno kako bi se izbjeglo "obraćanje s neistomišljenicima".
Rasprava je bila izuzetno žestoka, s izrazitim napadima i optužbama. HDZ-ovi zastupnici su pokušavali smiriti situaciju, ali su više puta dobili opomene, a neki su izgubili pravo na govor. Kekin je također izrazila nelagodu nad obiteljima saborskih zastupnika, a predsjednik Sabora Gordan Jandroković je više puta morao smiriti situaciju u sabornici. Međutim, Kekin je naglasila da je njihov posao zaštititi javni interes, a da je to smrtno ozbiljan posao. Ona je također istakla da će, ako HDZ ostane u vlasti, osnivati istražno povjerenstvo kako bi utvrdila političku i institucionalnu odgovornost.
Stranke kao što su SDP i DOMiNO također su reagirale na situaciju. SDP-ov Miroslav Marković smatra da je HDZ-ova taktika skrenuti pažnju na aferu Medikol, ali i na sve privatizacije, i da bi se uistinu trebalo truditi "na čistoću". Samo je ustanoviti što nije vrijedno, a da bi znali bolje za budućnost. Međutim, HDZ-ov Josip Borić je istaknuo da istina neće utvrditi istražno povjerenstvo, već građanski sud na temelju tužbi Medikola protiv Kekin.
Hrvatska je druga zemlja s najvišim brojem smrtnosti od raka u EU-u, a liječenje se provodi u 11 postotku svih država članica EU-a. Ona je također ustanovila da je Hrvatska uključila dvadeset godina nelegalnog liječenja, što je potrebno otkriti.
Međutim, HDZ je odbio osnivanje istražnog povjerenstva, smatrajući da je to "čudna policija za rješavanje nesposobnosti". Međutim, Kekin je naglasila da je potrebno utvrditi činjenicu da je država postala ovisna o privatnom pružatelju usluga. Ona je također ustanovila da je Medicin uključen u poslovni prostor u javnim bolnicama, uključujući KBC Rijeka, bez provedenog javnog natječaja, i da je uključen nezakonitost u pregovorima s Ministarstvom zdravlja. Prema njenim riječima, Hrvatska je druga najviša zemlja po broju smrtnosti od raka u EU-u, a liječenje se nalazi na 11. mjestu po prosjeku od EU-a.
Ona je također istakla da je Hrvatska uključena dvadeset godina u nezakonitost, i da je potrebno da se to otkrije.
10 izvještaja
N1 HrvatskaNeovisanLijevoČinjenice 95Objektivnost 80jučerThe Croatian Parliament debated a proposal by the 'Možemo' parliamentary group to establish an investigative committee into the business dealings of private clinic Medikol with the Croatian Health Insurance Fund (HZZO) and relevant state institutions. The proposal was submitted in March and supported by some members of the Social Democratic Party (SDP). Parliamentary representative Dalija Orešković criticized the ruling HDZ party for rejecting the establishment of such a committee, arguing that this signals a lack of transparency and accountability. She compared the situation to Germany’s parliamentary oversight mechanisms and accused the HDZ of transforming the Croatian Parliament into a powerless body, akin to a dictatorship. Orešković also highlighted concerns over potential corruption involving former Prime Minister Ivo Sanader and Medikol, including allegations of improper allocation of public hospital spaces and financial improprieties. She emphasized the need to prevent the HDZ from declaring the Medikol case irrelevant and continuing to conceal past practices.
Procjena pristranosti (Lijevo): The article frames the rejection of the investigative committee as a sign of authoritarianism and corruption by the HDZ, using strong language like 'dictatorship,' 'corruption,' and 'skimming money.' It emphasizes the need for transparency and criticizes the ruling party for undermining democratic监督
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 95 · Objektivnost 80): Factual accuracy aligns with N1, but some statements lack direct evidence. Objectivity is slightly compromised by emotive language like 'Auf Wiedersehen' and strong political criticism.
N1 HrvatskaNeovisanLijevoČinjenice 90Objektivnost 85jučer Miletić prozvao USKOK i institucije: Što ste napravili u ova dva tjedna?MP Marin Miletić (Most) has asked the Croatian Sports Integrity Agency (USKOK) and other relevant institutions what actions they have taken over the past two weeks following his criminal complaint against Siniša Krajča, the head of the Croatian Olympic Committee (HOO), and several others. In his statement, Miletić questioned whether investigations had begun, if documents had been retrieved, and if responsible individuals had been interviewed. He filed the complaint due to suspicions of illegal practices in public procurement, event organization, and financial management at the HOO. Miletić highlighted that the HOO managed over €231 million in public funds between 2021 and 2025, with revenue increasing from €25.7 million to €68.6 million, which he attributes to increased public funding rather than successful marketing efforts. He also raised questions about the role of the Marketing Office within the HOO, noting a 27% increase in staff despite reliance on state funding and the absence of major sponsors. Miletić referenced past scandals involving Vedran Pavlek and the Croatian Ski Association, asking about the progress of investigations into those cases and whether all individuals,包括
Procjena pristranosti (Lijevo): The article frames the MP's inquiry as a critical examination of potential corruption and misuse of public funds by sports officials, using strong language to highlight alleged misconduct and questioning the integrity of high-profile figures. The emphasis on uncovering wrongdoing and holding leaders
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 90 · Objektivnost 85): Accurate representation of N1 content. Neutral tone and factual reporting of parliamentary debate and Kekin’s comments.
Index.hrNeovisanLijevoČinjenice 90Objektivnost 80jučerThe Croatian Parliament is currently discussing a proposal by the 'Možemo' parliamentary group to establish an investigative commission into the business dealings between private clinic Medikol and the Croatian Health Insurance Fund (HZZO), as well as relevant state institutions. The proposal was submitted in March and has received support from some members of the Social Democratic Party (SDP). The goal is to investigate potential institutional failures and illegalities in the contracting and financing of diagnostic healthcare services, particularly PET/CT scans funded by the national budget. Parliamentary representative Dalija Orešković criticized the ruling HDZ party for allegedly avoiding the establishment of such a commission, comparing the situation to Germany’s parliamentary oversight mechanisms. She accused the HDZ of transforming the Croatian Parliament into a powerless body and warned that this lack of control undermines democratic governance. Orešković also claimed that former Prime Minister Ivo Sanader, who is under investigation for corruption, had ties to Medikol, which was allowed to develop a network of PET/CT devices across Croatia without proper public tenders. She
Procjena pristranosti (Lijevo): The article frames the issue as a significant corruption scandal involving a former prime minister and a private clinic, criticizing the ruling HDZ party for obstructing transparency and accountability. It uses strong language against the HDZ, accusing them of undermining democracy and enabling a 'd
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 90 · Objektivnost 80): Factual content matches N1 closely. Maintains a balanced tone while criticizing HDZ and Plenković, though some emotional language is used.
Jutarnji listNeovisanLijevoČinjenice 88Objektivnost 80prije 18 hHrvatska HDZ stranka odbacila je prijedlog osnivanja istražne komisije o Medikolu, privatnom pružatelju zdravstvene zaštite, koju smatraju "partijskom policijom koja cilja protivnike". Kao odgovor, Ivana Kekin, članica opozicijske stranke Možemo! , optužila je HDZ i Medikol za urotu u potiskivanju nadzora nad navodnom korupcijom koja uključuje gotovo dva desetljeća pogrešnog upravljanja u onkološkoj dijagnostici. Tvrdila je da je Medikol pokušao da je ušutka kroz zastrašivanje i financijski pritisak, dok je HDZ izbjegavao rješavanje pitanja kako bi spriječio pitanja o tome zašto Hrvatska gotovo 20 godina nije osigurala osnovnu dijagnostičku opremu za pacijente s rakom.
Procjena pristranosti (Lijevo): U članku se sukob između HDZ-a i Možemo! prikazuje kao borba za transparentnost i borbu protiv korupcije, uz jake optužbe protiv HDZ-a i Medikola.
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 88 · Objektivnost 80): Faithful to N1 content. Maintains objective tone despite strong political rhetoric. Balanced reporting of parliamentary actions and responses.
HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)Državni / javniLijevoČinjenice 87Objektivnost 78prije 18 hHrvatski parlament (Sabor) odbacio je prijedlog o osnivanju istražnog tijela za Medikol, privatnog pružatelja zdravstvene zaštite, a protiv njega je glasalo 83 zastupnika od 40 pristalica. Prijedlog je podržala vladajuća Socijaldemokratska stranka (SDP), dok je opozicijska HDZ pozvala građane da prijave sve sumnje na nezakonite aktivnosti. Članovi stranke "Možemo!" najavili su da će poslati svu prikupljenu dokumentaciju o Medikolu Državnom tužiteljstvu (DORH).
Procjena pristranosti (Lijevo): U članku se odbacivanje istražnog tijela kao neuspjeh vladajuće stranke u rješavanju sistemskih problema u zdravstvenom sektoru, naglašavajući odgovornost i transparentnost.
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 87 · Objektivnost 78): Accurate reflection of N1. Some emotive language used, but overall maintains objectivity in reporting parliamentary debate and accusations.
HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)Državni / javniLijevoČinjenice 85Objektivnost 75jučer Sabor o osnivanju istražnog povjerenstva za Medikol, sutra glasanjeHrvatski parlament (Sabor) raspravlja o prijedlogu koalicije "Možemo" o osnivanju istražne komisije za ispitivanje poslovanja Medikola, privatnog pružatelja zdravstvene zaštite, u odnosu na njegovu suradnju s Fondom za zdravstveno osiguranje (HZZO) i drugim državnim institucijama. Prijedlog se fokusira na potencijalne nepravilnosti u ugovaranju i financiranju dijagnostičkih zdravstvenih usluga, osobito PET / CT skeniranja, koja se financiraju iz javnih sredstava. Zastupnica Ivana Kekin iz "Možemo" istakla je zabrinutost zbog nedostatka transparentnosti i odgovornosti, napominjući da je Medikol primao značajno javno financiranje, dok državi nedostaju detaljni podaci o plaćanjima. Naglasila je potrebu za istragom o tome tko je donio odluke o nabavi PET / CT strojeva i jesu li pacijenti bili nepotrebno izloženi zračenju zbog nejasnih smjernica.
Procjena pristranosti (Lijevo): Članak obuhvaća pitanje kao zabrinutost za javnu odgovornost i transparentnost u ugovorima o zdravstvenoj zaštiti, naglašavajući ulogu koalicije "Možemo" i naglašavajući sistemska pitanja u javnoj potrošnji.
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 85 · Objektivnost 75): Aligns with N1 but presents HDZ arguments in a biased way. Uses emotive language and lacks balance in presenting both sides.
Telegram.hrNeovisanDesnoČinjenice 85Objektivnost 70jučerThe article discusses the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ)'s arguments against establishing an investigative committee into Medikol, a private healthcare company accused of receiving excessive state funding for PET/CT scans while public health facilities lack necessary equipment. HDZ parliamentarian Željko Glavić argues that there is no need for such a committee, claiming that if something is wrong, the legislature is not competent to investigate. The article criticizes this stance as logically flawed and politically motivated, noting that the law explicitly allows investigative committees to examine the legality of public institutions. It also highlights broader concerns about the ruling party’s suppression of democratic oversight, referencing past instances where similar committees were blocked, including one related to Agrokor. The piece suggests that these actions undermine transparency and democratic accountability.
Procjena pristranosti (Desno): The article frames the HDZ's opposition to the investigative committee as reasonable and legally grounded, emphasizing their trust in institutions and the supposed overreach of parliamentary oversight. It uses dismissive language toward critics who argue for transparency, implying that those demands
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 85 · Objektivnost 70): Claims align with N1 but present arguments from HDZ in a biased manner. Uses loaded phrases like 'logička konstrukcija' and lacks neutrality.
Jutarnji listNeovisanLijevoČinjenice 65Objektivnost 55jučer Gdje je nestalo 165.000 eura od berbe mandarina? ‘Štefica mi je javila da dođem u banku i dignem novac‘An investigation into the disappearance of 165,000 euros from the harvest of mandarines by the company Vagros Zagreb, which was paid into the account of the now-defunct Zagreb-based company Fructus Legumina. The funds were allegedly misappropriated by the company’s de facto manager, Štefica Vincek, who is accused of directing the money to third-party companies and withdrawing large sums via ATMs. The case involves three individuals—Vincek, former director Danijela Odicki, and employee Ivan Stunić—who are being tried at the Zagreb County Court. Vincek has been unable to attend court due to health issues, and the trial has been postponed until September 9th. Prosecutors allege that Vincek, along with deceased co-conspirator Dubravko Crnković, installed Odicki and Stunić in the company and instructed them to distribute the funds or withdraw it herself. All three deny the charges, but during the investigation, they shifted blame onto each other. Vincek claims responsibility for the actions, stating she was misled by Odicki and that she was only involved in opening a bank account for her.
Procjena pristranosti (Lijevo): The article frames the issue through the lens of legal accountability and corruption, emphasizing the alleged misuse of public funds and the involvement of private entities in financial misconduct. While the subject is economic crime, the narrative leans toward highlighting systemic failures and the
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 65 · Objektivnost 55): Shifts focus to unrelated Olympic corruption inquiry. Contains speculative claims and lacks alignment with primary source.
Index.hrNeovisanLijevoČinjenice 60Objektivnost 50jučer Kekin: Plenković i HDZ nastupaju kao trbuhozborci MedikolaIvana Kekin, president of the parliamentary Committee on Health from the 'Možemo' party, criticized Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and President Zoran Milanović over their conflict regarding the Medikol case. She accused Plenković of protecting private interests by allowing millions of euros in public funds to flow to Medikol, a private healthcare provider, while violating the constitution. Kekin highlighted that Plenković has refused to establish an investigative committee into the Medikol case, similar to past refusals over the last decade. She emphasized that such committees are standard democratic tools used when there is suspicion of actions against the public interest. Kekin pointed out that Medikol has controlled the only PET/CT scanner in Dalmatia for years, leading to significant public spending on services that could be provided by state-run facilities. She also claimed that HDZ is blocking all discussions about Medikol and will block any investigation into the matter.
Procjena pristranosti (Lijevo): The article frames the situation as a violation of constitutional duties and highlights the protection of private interests at the expense of public welfare, using critical language towards the ruling party and its policies. The emphasis on constitutional breaches and the blocking of investigations,
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 60 · Objektivnost 50): Focuses on unrelated case of mandarin fruit theft. Lacks connection to Medikol issue. Highly subjective and emotionally charged.
N1 HrvatskaNeovisanSredinaprije 20 h Burna rasprava o Medikolu: Žestok okršaj u Saboru, pljuštale opomene: "Fućka se vama za zdravstvo"Hrvatski parlament (Sabor) većinom glasova odbacio je prijedlog stranke Možemo! o osnivanju istražne komisije o poslovanju privatne klinike Medikol i njezinim odnosima s Fondom za zdravstveno osiguranje (HZZO).
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku su prikazane obje strane rasprave, bez da se otvoreno favorizira jedna nad drugom.
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.
Postani podupiratelj
Croatia
