Nacionalni preiskovalni urad (NPU) je u stvari domnevne vpletenosti Roka Snežiča u stvari Dars na Specializirano državno tožilstvo RS poslao izvješće po 148/10 članu Zakona o kazenskem postopku (ZKP). To znači, da policija u toj stvari protiv Snežiča ni zbrala zadostne dokaze za ovadbo zbog domnevnog primanja podkupnine. Poročilo je bilo poslano u skladu sa zakonom, kar znači, da policija ni vložila kazenske ovadbe, ker nima podlage za to. NPU je u stvari porocilu naglasio, da ni bilo zbranih dokaza, ki bi pokazali, da Rok Snežiča za stranko SDS prejel 90.000 evra.
Afera Dars izbila je u jesen 2023. godine, kada je komercijalna televizija POP TV objavila pričevanje neimenovane žvižgače, koja je trdil, da je podkupil Roka Snežiča u si tako zagotovil posel z Darsom. Televizija je također objavila posnetek, na kojem Snežič prima 5.000 evra, skupno naj bi od žvižgača prejel za 90.000 evra podkupnin. Denar naj bi Snežič zbiral tudi za stranko SDS. Takratni predsednik uprave Darsa Valentin Hajdinjak u Snežič stale sve očite zavrke, prav tako nepravilnosti zanikali v SDS. Hajdinjak je novembra istega odstopil s Darsa, pri čemu je zagotovil, da je vodil odgovorno u zakonu.
NPU je u travnju 2024. godine, nakon medijske kritike nepravilnosti, zbog zlorabe položaja u nedovoljnoj mjeri nakon što je provedena istraga u Darsu, objavio je i pri Hajdinjaku u Snežiču. Kaznivih dejanj je bilo osumnjičenih šest osoba, među kojima je drugi Snežič, pa i bivši direktor za područje održavanja u Darsu Damijan Jaklin, sada državni sekretar na ministarstvu za infrastrukturu i energetiku.
Na policiji su tako potvrdili da su u skladu sa zakonom o kazenskom postupku poslali izvještaj o konkretnim ili određivim fizičkim povredama zbog čuvanja osobnih podataka.
Rok Snežič je u svojoj poruci za STA rekao da je novi direktor NPU poslao na tožilstvo izvješće, koje je godinu dana čekalo u predalu, da u prvom slučaju Dars policija nije prikupila nikakve dokaze, da je Rok Snežič za stranko SDS prejel 90.000 evra. Specializirano državno tožilstvo je na temelju izvješća policije sada odlučilo, ali je stvar zaključena ali zahtijevalo dodatna objašnjenja odnosno daljnje postupke. Snežič je također izrazio uvjerenje, da je riječ o političkom orkestru, s ciljem uklanjanja Valentina Hajdinjaka, diskreditacije SDS-a u NSi u smislu preusmeritve pozornosti od drugih problema u tom području.
Snežić je također napomenuo pravne korake protiv Alenci Bratuškovića u Andreju Ribiču, koji je po posljednjim navodima izazvao. Njegova ocjena je da je riječ o mediju iskorištenom za političke ciljeve, što je izazvalo medijsku povezanost. Isto tako, izražena je zabrinutost u vezi s tim, tko će biti odgovoran za to, što je utjecalo na njegovu reputaciju u životu u posljednje dvije godine.
4 izvještaja
N1 SlovenijaNeovisanLijevoČinjenice 90Objektivnost 80prije 17 hThe article discusses the ongoing investigation into alleged corruption involving Rok Snežič, a former member of the Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS), in connection with the 'Dars' scandal. The National Prosecutorial Office (NPU) has concluded that there were insufficient grounds for criminal charges against Snežič due to lack of conclusive evidence regarding the receipt of €90,000 in bribes. The scandal emerged in autumn 2023 when a whistleblower claimed to have bribed Snežič to secure a position at Dars, a construction company. Despite initial denials by both Snežič and former Dars CEO Valentin Hajdinjak, the NPU conducted home searches in 2024. Six individuals were suspected of involvement, including Snežič and Damijan Jaklin, now a state secretary. The police confirmed they sent a report to the specialized state prosecutor’s office but did not specify which individuals were involved due to privacy concerns. Snežič stated that the report indicated no evidence of bribery.
Procjena pristranosti (Lijevo): The article frames the situation in a way that suggests the authorities failed to act decisively against political figures, implying potential systemic issues within the legal process. It emphasizes the lack of evidence against Snežič while highlighting the broader implications for political ethics.
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 90 · Objektivnost 80): Highly factual and consistent with other sources regarding NPU’s decision not to file charges against Snežič. Maintains neutrality by presenting information without emotive language. References to media exposure and legal procedures are accurately reported.
DomovinaNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 88Objektivnost 78prije 19 hU članku se raspravlja o pravnim postupcima povezanim s "DARS-om" u kojem je sudjelovao Rok Snežič, bivši izvršni direktor DARS-a. Nacionalno tužiteljstvo (NPU) podnijelo je izvješće Specijaliziranom državnom tužiteljstvu na temelju članka 148/10 Zakonika o kaznenom postupku, ali nije podnijelo kaznenu žalbu protiv Snežića u vezi s navodnim podmićivanjem za SDS. To ukazuje na to da na temelju prikupljenih dokaza nema dovoljno osnova za kaznenu optužbu. Slučaj je trenutno u fazi pripreme odluke državnog tužitelja, a ograničene informacije se otkrivaju zbog zabrinutosti za privatnost.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak prikazuje činjenični razvoj događaja i pravne postupke bez otvorene favoriziranja bilo koje političke strane.
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 88 · Objektivnost 78): Accurate reporting on NPU’s actions and legal framework. Provides clear explanation of the difference between a report and a charge. Maintains balance but slightly leans towards emphasizing the implications of the NPU’s decision without overt bias.
RTV Slovenija (MMC)Državni / javniSredinaČinjenice 85Objektivnost 75prije 17 hThe article reports on the ongoing investigation into alleged corruption involving Rok Snežič, a member of the Slovenian Social Democracy Party (SDS), in connection with the Dars affair. The National Prosecution Office (NPU) has concluded that there were insufficient grounds for prosecution against Snežič, based on police findings that no evidence was collected proving he received €90,000 in bribes for the SDS. The case emerged in autumn 2023 after a whistleblower claimed Snežič was bribed to secure a position at Dars, a company involved in infrastructure projects. Despite initial denials by Snežič and former Dars CEO Valentin Hajdinjak, who later became the Minister of Defense, the NPU launched investigations in April 2024. Six individuals, including Snežič and former Dars employee Damijan Jaklin, were implicated. The police stated they sent a report to the specialized state prosecutor’s office but could not confirm specific individuals due to privacy concerns.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): The article presents information from both sides—Snežič denies receiving bribes, while the whistleblower claims otherwise. The reporting remains neutral, citing official sources such as the NPU and police, without overtly favoring either side. There is no clear ideological slant in the framing or ph
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 85 · Objektivnost 75): Factual accuracy is high as it aligns with cross-source consensus on NPU not gathering sufficient evidence for charges against Snežič. However, the article includes direct quotes from Snežič which may introduce bias. The mention of 'domnevnega prejemanja podkupnine' is consistent with other reports
VečerNeovisan🔒SredinaČinjenice 82Objektivnost 70prije 14 hThe article reports that Rok Snežič, a tax advisor, has been cleared of criminal charges related to accepting a bribe in connection with the Dars affair. The National Prosecution Office (NPU) did not gather evidence against him in this context. A group of four plaintiffs has requested the initiation of a judicial investigation. The piece raises several questions regarding the allegations against Snežič, his response to the NPU, the origins of the Dars affair, and who else is involved in the case.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): The article presents factual information about the legal status of Rok Snežič in relation to the Dars affair without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It outlines the current situation based on available information and does not exhibit clear ideological leaning in its framing or use
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 82 · Objektivnost 70): Contains some factual elements but appears more focused on the legal process and potential consequences rather than providing full context. Includes less detailed background and omits some key points present in other articles, leading to lower objectivity due to focus on procedural aspects over bala
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.
Postani podupiratelj
Slovenia
