ON
← Natrag na feed
Preko Zemljinih Granica
Slovenia💻 TehnologijaBliže progresivnomprije 4 dana

Preko Zemljinih Granica

U članku se raspravlja o rastućoj potražnji za računalnom infrastrukturom vođenom brzim napretkom u umjetnoj inteligenciji, naglašavajući ograničenja zemaljskih podatkovnih centara kao što su pristup energiji, dostupnost lokacije, dugotrajni procesi odobrenja, potrošnja vode i zabrinutost za sigurnost podataka.

A Slovenian columnist has raised concerns over the water consumption linked to artificial intelligence systems, highlighting how even small interactions with AI models can have a substantial environmental impact. The issue centers around the amount of water required to power and cool the servers that run these technologies, particularly large language models such as ChatGPT and GPT-3. According to the writer, one query and response from ChatGPT, which consists of 100 words, consumes approximately 517 milliliters of water. This figure includes both the water used for cooling the servers and the water necessary to generate the electricity that powers them. The columnist points out that while the direct water usage per interaction appears minimal, just 0.3 milliliters, the scale of AI usage dramatically increases this number. With ChatGPT reportedly receiving nearly a billion queries daily, the annual water consumption could range from 4.2 to 6.6 cubic kilometers. For context, the average person in Slovenia uses between 40 and 60 cubic meters of water annually. If scaled up, the water demand for AI operations alone would surpass that of millions of individuals. Furthermore, the writer emphasizes that these figures do not account for additional water loss through evaporation or leakage within data centers. The production of electricity needed to sustain AI infrastructure also contributes significantly to the overall water footprint. For instance, the creation of the GPT-3 model required approximately 700,000 liters of water for cooling and 5.4 million liters for generating the electricity that powered the servers. As new AI models continue to emerge and older ones remain operational, the cumulative effect on water resources becomes increasingly pronounced. The article references a United Nations University study suggesting that the global water consumption associated with AI could reach unprecedented levels by the end of the decade. While the exact projections remain under discussion, the trend indicates a growing concern over the sustainability of AI technologies. Environmentalists argue that the energy-intensive nature of AI systems, combined with their reliance on water for cooling and power generation, poses a serious challenge to global water conservation efforts. In addition to the direct water usage, the environmental impact extends beyond just the immediate consumption. The process of producing and distributing the electricity that fuels AI systems involves extracting and processing raw materials, which often requires significant water inputs. These factors contribute to a broader ecological footprint that encompasses not only water but also land use, pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions. As awareness of these issues grows, there is increasing pressure on tech companies and researchers to develop more sustainable practices. Some initiatives focus on improving the efficiency of data centers, using renewable energy sources, and implementing advanced cooling techniques that reduce water dependency. However, the transition to greener AI solutions will require coordinated efforts across industries and governments to ensure that technological progress does not come at the expense of environmental health.

Idi na primarne izvore (1)

Službeni izvori na kojima se izvještavanje temelji. Pročitaj ih izravno da zaobiđeš uokvirivanje.

3 izvještaja

Mladina logoMladinaNeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice 95Objektivnost 65prije 4 dana
Zna li umjetna inteligencija da je bez vode mrtva?

U članku se raspravlja o značajnoj potrošnji vode povezane s umjetnom inteligencijom, posebno usredotočenom na energetske i rashladne zahtjeve za sustave poput ChatGPT-a i GPT-3.

Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se pitanje potrošnje vode od strane umjetne inteligencije prikazuje kao hitna ekološka briga, naglašavajući razmjere korištenja resursa i njegov ekološki utjecaj.

Zašto činjenice (95): This article closely mirrors the content of the Dnevnik article, quoting similar statements about AI's water usage and providing detailed calculations. It accurately represents the concerns raised in the primary source document and includes specific examples like the GPT-3 model's water consumption.

Zašto objektivnost (65): The tone is more confrontational and critical, especially towards the creators of AI. Phrases like 'zganja' and 'zamolčijo' suggest a biased perspective. While the facts are accurate, the language implies judgment against those responsible for AI development, reducing objectivity.

Delo logoDeloNeovisan🔒SredinaČinjenice 85Objektivnost 70prije 6 dana
Ekološka bomba našeg vremena

U članku se raspravlja o utjecaju umjetne inteligencije na okoliš, naglašavajući značajnu potrošnju energije i korištenje resursa povezanih s podatkovnim centrima koji pokreću AI sustave.

Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Iako je pitanje klimatskih promjena i uloge tehnologije u njima politički opterećeno, okvir ostaje objektivan, s naglaskom na znanstvene i znanstvene činjenice.

Zašto činjenice (85): The article references a United Nations report from June 2026 discussing environmental costs of AI, including water usage. It cites specific figures like 945 TWh of electricity annually by 2030 and mentions a study by UNU predicting increased water consumption. These are supported by primary sources

Zašto objektivnost (70): The tone is somewhat alarmist, using phrases like 'eco-bomb' and emphasizing the severity of AI's environmental footprint. While informative, it leans toward highlighting negative impacts without presenting counterpoints or alternative solutions.

Si21 logoSi21NeovisanSredinaČinjenice 80Objektivnost 75prije 10 dana
Preko Zemljinih Granica

U članku se raspravlja o rastućoj potražnji za računalnom infrastrukturom vođenom brzim napretkom u umjetnoj inteligenciji, naglašavajući ograničenja zemaljskih podatkovnih centara kao što su pristup energiji, dostupnost lokacije, dugotrajni procesi odobrenja, potrošnja vode i zabrinutost za sigurnost podataka.

Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak se fokusira na tehnološki razvoj povezan s svemirskim podatkovnim centrima i njihovim potencijalnim prednostima i izazovima.

Zašto činjenice (80): The article discusses orbital data centers and references a Boston Consulting Group analysis titled 'Beyond Terrestrial Limits.' It provides details about satellite constellations and their potential role in AI computing, which aligns with known developments in space-based computing. It doesn't dire

Zašto objektivnost (75): The article presents information objectively, focusing on technical aspects and economic feasibility. It acknowledges limitations and provides balanced insights into the potential and challenges of orbital data centers without overt bias.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Isti događaj, grupiran prema političkom nagibu medija koji su o njemu izvještavali.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.

Postani podupiratelj

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Isti događaj kako se o njemu izvještavalo u drugim zemljama.

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.

Postani podupiratelj

Provjera tvrdnji

Ključne činjenične tvrdnje i koliko ih izvora potvrđuje odn. osporava.

Provjera tvrdnji

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.

Postani podupiratelj

Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.

ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mjesec.

Postani podupiratelj

Povezane priče