ON
← Natrag na feed
Maga ne vjeruje poštanskim glasovima.
United Kingdom🏛️ PolitikaKonzervativnoprije 9 h

Maga ne vjeruje poštanskim glasovima.

U članku se raspravlja o tekućoj kampanji bivšeg predsjednika Donalda Trumpa za ograničavanje glasanja putem pošte, navodeći zabrinutost zbog prijevare unatoč nedostatku dokaza. Trump je dosljedno kritizirao glasanje putem pošte, tvrdeći da je doprinijelo njegovom gubitku na izborima 2020. godine, a sada nastoji ih u potpunosti eliminirati zakonodavnim i izvršnim radnjama. Njegova administracija je gurala za povećani nadzor glasanja putem pošte od strane američke poštanske službe, tvrdeći da ne-državljani glasaju nezakonito. Međutim, kritičari tvrde da Trampovim tvrdnjama nedostaju vjerodostojni dokazi i da je metodologija iza nekih izvještaja o podršci upitna.

President Donald Trump has intensified efforts to undermine mail-in voting in the lead-up to the November midterm elections, leveraging longstanding claims of fraud to influence the outcome. According to recent reports, Trump has repeatedly accused mail-in ballots of being inherently corrupt, despite having personally used them in past elections, including a Republican primary in Florida earlier this year. His rhetoric aligns with a broader strategy to shift control of U.S. elections toward federal oversight, a move critics argue aims to secure a Republican victory in November. The controversy surrounding mail-in voting has deepened following the 2020 presidential election, which Trump lost to Joe Biden. Since returning to power, Trump has pushed for legislative changes through the Save American Elections Act (SAVE America Act). This proposed legislation includes provisions such as requiring valid identification and proof of citizenship for voting, while also seeking to eliminate mail-in ballots entirely, except for specific groups like military personnel and individuals with disabilities. However, the bill faced resistance in the Republican-controlled Senate, where it lacked sufficient support to pass. Frustrated by the legislative roadblock, Trump shifted focus to executive action. He issued an executive order granting the U.S. Postal Service authority to withhold delivery of mail-in ballots to states that fail to provide lists of eligible voters. Federal officials claim this measure is intended to identify non-citizens on state voter rolls, a concern central to Trump's narrative about widespread electoral fraud. In late August, Trump shared a social media post citing a Census Bureau analysis suggesting over 24,000 non-citizens voted illegally in the 2020 election. Critics, however, dispute the methodology of this analysis, noting that the research team included members affiliated with the America First Policy Institute, a Trump-aligned think tank. The issue of mail-in voting has become increasingly polarized. Democrats argue that Trump's actions aim to disenfranchise voters who are more likely to use mail-in ballots. Data from the States United Democracy Center indicates that over one-third of Democratic voters cast mail-in ballots in 2024, compared to approximately one-quarter of Republican voters. Meanwhile, the elderly and residents in rural areas, who traditionally rely on mail-in voting, find themselves caught in a legal and political struggle over the future of the practice. According to the advocacy group Common Cause, demographic breakdowns show that 18 percent of Black voters, one-third of Hispanic voters, and half of all Asian American voters used mail-in ballots in 2024. These figures underscore the potential impact of policies targeting mail-in voting, particularly on communities of color. Legal challenges are mounting as states grapple with the implications of Trump's executive order, which could disrupt the distribution of ballots nationwide. The debate over mail-in voting reflects deeper tensions within the U.S. electoral system. While proponents highlight the convenience and accessibility of mail-in ballots, opponents raise concerns about security and integrity. The Brookings Institution reported that instances of mail voting fraud averaged just four cases per 10 million mail votes cast during four general elections from 2016 to 2022. Despite this, the perception of widespread fraud persists among some segments of the population, fueled by political discourse and misinformation. As the November midterms approach, the situation remains fluid. Legal battles continue to unfold, with multiple jurisdictions preparing to challenge the new rules affecting mail-in ballot distribution. The outcome of these disputes could significantly shape the electoral landscape, influencing both the process and the results of the upcoming elections.

Idi na primarne izvore (1)

Službeni izvori na kojima se izvještavanje temelji. Pročitaj ih izravno da zaobiđeš uokvirivanje.

1 izvještaja

iNews logoiNewsNeovisanKonzervativnoprije 9 h
Maga ne vjeruje poštanskim glasovima.

U članku se raspravlja o tekućoj kampanji bivšeg predsjednika Donalda Trumpa za ograničavanje glasanja putem pošte, navodeći zabrinutost zbog prijevare unatoč nedostatku dokaza. Trump je dosljedno kritizirao glasanje putem pošte, tvrdeći da je doprinijelo njegovom gubitku na izborima 2020. godine, a sada nastoji ih u potpunosti eliminirati zakonodavnim i izvršnim radnjama. Njegova administracija je gurala za povećani nadzor glasanja putem pošte od strane američke poštanske službe, tvrdeći da ne-državljani glasaju nezakonito. Međutim, kritičari tvrde da Trampovim tvrdnjama nedostaju vjerodostojni dokazi i da je metodologija iza nekih izvještaja o podršci upitna.

Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): U članku se Trumpovo protivljenje glasovanju poštom prikazuje kao legitimna zabrinutost, unatoč nedostatku dokaza, i naglašava njegove napore da ograniči pristup glasovanju kao strategiju za osiguravanje izbornih pobjeda.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Isti događaj, grupiran prema političkom nagibu medija koji su o njemu izvještavali.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.

Postani podupiratelj

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Isti događaj kako se o njemu izvještavalo u drugim zemljama.

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.

Postani podupiratelj

Provjera tvrdnji

Ključne činjenične tvrdnje i koliko ih izvora potvrđuje odn. osporava.

Provjera tvrdnji

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.

Postani podupiratelj

Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.

ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mjesec.

Postani podupiratelj

Povezane priče