%2520preside%2520la%2520vista%2520p%25C3%25BAblica%2520en%2520el%2520Tribunal%2520Supremo%2520sobre%2520los%2520menores%2520migrantes%2520el%2520pasado%252029%2520de%2520mayo.%2520EFE%2F%2520J.P.Gandul%2520POOL&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)
SpainThe Spanish State Attorney General's Office has submitted legal arguments opposing the elevation of a preliminary question to the European Court of Justice regarding the regularization process for irregular immigrants. The document asserts that the national government retains the authority to grant residency permits under national law and that the current regulation does not conflict with EU legislation. The legal team argues that the judges' concerns about potential violations of EU rules are based on incomplete information and that the proposed regularization process aligns with EU regulations. They emphasize that the issue should not be escalated to the European level at this stage due to the lack of substantive discussion on the matter.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): The article presents the legal arguments from the State Attorney General's Office without overtly favoring either side. It describes both the judicial concern over EU compliance and the government's counterarguments, maintaining a balanced presentation of the positions involved. There is no clear sl
Zašto ove ocjene (Činjenice 85 · Objektivnost 78): The article accurately reports the stance of the State Attorney General opposing the Supreme Court's potential referral to EU Justice. It provides details on legal arguments and timelines, aligning with cross-source consensus. Objectivity is slightly compromised by the use of terms like 'conservador
