The Madhya Pradesh government has moved forward with plans to implement a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) that would establish a single set of laws governing marriage, divorce, succession, and adoption for all citizens, regardless of religion or caste. This comes after the state's cabinet approved the draft bill on July 19, 2026, following recommendations from a committee led by retired Supreme Court Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai. The legislation, expected to be presented in the Legislative Assembly during the upcoming Monsoon Session beginning on July 20, 2026, includes provisions to ban polygamy, outlaw practices such as triple talaq and nikah halala, and require registration of both marriages and live-in relationships. However, the bill explicitly excludes Scheduled Tribes (Adivasis) from its scope, citing the need to preserve their unique cultural heritage and traditional lifestyles. The timeline leading to the approval of the UCC began with the submission of the draft report by Justice Desai’s committee, which recommended excluding Adivasis from the proposed law. Following this, the Madhya Pradesh Cabinet convened in a special meeting in Jagdishpur, near Bhopal, on July 19, 2026, to approve the bill. The move follows similar efforts by other BJP-led states, including Uttarakhand, Gujarat, and Assam, each of which has advanced the implementation of a UCC. The bill is also aligned with the broader goals of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party, which has long advocated for a unified personal law applicable to all Indian citizens. The proposed UCC introduces sweeping changes to personal laws currently governed by religious texts. It mandates that only one legal marriage be recognized at any time, effectively banning polygamy across all communities. Practices such as triple talaq, which allow a Muslim man to instantly divorce his wife by uttering the word "talaq" three times, and nikah halala, where a divorced woman marries another man and then divorces him again to remarry her ex-husband, will be declared illegal and subject to penalties. Additionally, the bill requires all marriages and divorces to be registered through government platforms, ensuring legal recognition and protection for both spouses, particularly women. Live-in relationships will also fall under the purview of the UCC. Couples entering into such arrangements must register their relationship with local authorities within a month of cohabitation. If either partner is under the age of 21, their parents or guardians must be informed, and the records will be shared with local police. Children born from live-in relationships will be granted legitimacy and full inheritance rights, mirroring the status of children born from formal marriages. Married individuals engaging in live-in relationships will face potential imprisonment for up to five years, according to the bill. The exclusion of Scheduled Tribes from the UCC has drawn attention, as the bill explicitly states that communities falling under Articles 342 and 366 (Clause 25) of the Constitution, along with those protected under Part XXI, will not be subjected to the new laws. This exemption reflects concerns about preserving the distinct cultural identities and customary practices of these communities. The rationale behind this exclusion was emphasized by Chief Minister Mohan Yadav, who stated that the law aims to uphold equality and justice for all citizens while respecting the traditions of indigenous groups. Reactions to the proposed legislation have varied. Chief Minister Mohan Yadav has defended the UCC as a necessary step toward ensuring equal rights and social harmony, emphasizing that the law does not target any particular religion or community. He cited public sentiment, noting that over 80% of Muslim women and 40% of Muslim men reportedly supported the initiative. However, opposition voices, particularly from the Congress party, have criticized the bill, arguing that it infringes upon fundamental rights related to culture and education. Some members of the opposition have called for the bill to be referred to a select committee for further review, contending that it was passed without adequate deliberation. The Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly passed the UCC bill on July 21, 2026, despite objections from Congress lawmakers who staged protests and demanded that the bill be scrutinized further. During the debate, Yadav accused the opposition of opposing the measure to appease the Muslim community and criticized them for failing to support initiatives aimed at promoting equality. He also invoked historical references, suggesting that the Congress party itself had previously championed uniformity in governance before shifting stance. Meanwhile, the bill’s passage marks a significant legislative milestone for the state, setting the stage for its enforcement and potential impact on personal laws across India.
11 izvještaja
Scroll.inNeovisanKonzervativnoČinjenice 90Objektivnost 85prije 7 danaOdbor koji je formiran za izradu jedinstvenog građanskog zakonika (UCC) u Madhya Pradeshu, pod vodstvom umirovljenog sudaca Vrhovnog suda Ranjane Prakash Desai, preporučio je isključivanje planiranih plemena (Adivasis) iz opsega predloženog zakona. UCC ima za cilj uspostaviti zajednički pravni okvir za brak, razvod, nasljeđivanje i usvajanje u svim zajednicama, zamjenjujući postojeće zakone o osobnim zakonima zasnovane na religiji. Izvješće je podneseno glavnom ministru Mohanu Yadavu i proslijeđeno pravnom odjelu.
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): U članku se isključivanje Adivasija iz Jedinstvenog građanskog zakonika prikazuje kao preporuka panela koje je imenovala vlada, naglašavajući dugogodišnji program BJP-a za provedbu zajedničkog osobnog zakona.
Zašto činjenice (90): The article accurately summarizes the primary source, mentioning the recommendation to exclude Adivasis from the UCC and providing context about the panel and its composition. It aligns closely with the primary source and other articles.
Zašto objektivnost (85): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting the facts without editorializing or showing preference for any side. It is balanced and factual.
Scroll.inNeovisanKonzervativnoČinjenice 85Objektivnost 75prije 3 dana Prema UCC-u, samo oni s jednim brakom će imati pravo živjeti u Madhya Pradeshu: CMGlavni ministar Madhya Pradesha Mohan Yadav najavio je da će predloženi jedinstveni građanski zakonik (UCC) priznati samo jedan pravni brak i dati pravo boravka u državi isključivo pojedincima s jednim pravnim supružnikom. UCC ima za cilj zamijeniti vjerske osobne zakone s jedinstvenim nizom pravila koja uređuju brak, razvod, nasljeđivanje i posvajanje.
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): U članku se UCC prikazuje kao progresivni korak prema nacionalnom jedinstvu i jednakosti, naglašavajući hinduističke perspektive dok odbacuje muslimanske prakse poput poligamije.
Zašto činjenice (85): The article accurately reports the CM's statements supporting the UCC and the exclusion of tribal communities. It includes relevant details about the committee and the consultation process, aligning with the primary source.
Zašto objektivnost (75): The article is neutral in tone but includes direct quotes from the CM that may subtly reflect his views, though it remains mostly balanced.
NDTVStranački povezanSredinaČinjenice 85Objektivnost 70prije 3 danaVlada Madhya Pradesha planira uvesti Uniformni građanski zakon koji će zakonski priznati samo jedan brak, učinkovito sprečavajući pojedince da imaju više supružnika.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja prijedlog kao vladinu inicijativu bez otvorene podrške ili kritike politike.
Zašto činjenice (85): The article accurately reports that the MP government will propose a UCC bill ensuring legal recognition of only one marriage. However, it omits the critical detail that the panel recommended excluding Scheduled Tribals from the UCC, which is central to the primary source document. This omission sli
Zašto objektivnost (70): The article uses emotionally charged language like 'those with one marriage will stay in Madhya Pradesh,' which frames the UCC in a way that emphasizes exclusivity rather than neutrality. While it presents facts, the phrasing introduces a subtle bias.
Business StandardNeovisan🔒SredinaČinjenice 80Objektivnost 75prekjučerKabinet indijskog parlamenta odobrio je Uniform Civil Code (UCC) prijedlog zakona, koji ima za cilj zabraniti prakse kao što su poligamija, nikah halala i trostruki talaq. Ove prakse se smatraju štetnim i diskriminatornim prema predloženom zakonodavstvu.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku se zakonodavna akcija predstavlja kao činjenica, bez da se otvoreno naglašavaju ideološke pozicije, izvještava se o odobrenju zakona o UCC-u, bez da se zauzme jasan stav o moralnim ili društvenim implikacijama zabranjenih praksi, zadržavajući uravnotežen ton.
Zašto činjenice (80): The article accurately reports the UCC bill's provisions against polygamy and nikah halala. It also mentions the exclusion of Adivasis, aligning with the primary source and other articles.
Zašto objektivnost (75): The article is neutral in tone and presents the facts without bias, though it includes direct quotes from the CM that may subtly reflect his views.
The HinduNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 80Objektivnost 75prekjučerKabinet Madhya Pradesha odobrio je nacrt zakona koji predlaže provedbu jedinstvenog građanskog zakonika (UCC) u državi, čiji je cilj standardiziranje osobnih zakona u svim zajednicama. Zakon, koji je razvio šestčlanski odbor na čelu s penzioniranim sudacem Vrhovnog suda Ranjanom Prakashom Desaijem, isključuje planirane plemena (adivasi) iz područja UCC-a, pozivajući se na ustavne zaštite. Uključuje odredbe za zabranu poligamije, kriminalizaciju određenih praksi poput nikaha halala, i obvezu braka i razvoda registracije putem vladinih portala kako bi se zaštitili prava žena. Zakon također uvodi zahtjeve za žive u odnosima, uključujući prisegnute izjave i obaveštenje roditelja ako je jedan od partnera maloljetan.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku se odobravanje nacrta zakona o UCC-u predstavlja kao neutralna proceduralna ispravka, usredotočena na sadržaj zakonodavstva, a ne na donošenje jasnog ideološkog stajališta.
Zašto činjenice (80): The article accurately reports the approval of the UCC draft bill and the exemption of tribal communities. It includes specific details about the bill's provisions and the constitutional exemptions, aligning with the primary source.
Zašto objektivnost (75): The article is generally neutral but includes some direct quotes from the CM that may subtly reflect his views, though it remains mostly balanced.
Times of IndiaNeovisanKonzervativnoČinjenice 80Objektivnost 65prije 6 danaGlavni ministar Madhya Pradesha Mohan Yadav javno je podržao uvođenje jedinstvenog građanskog zakonika (UCC) u državi, naglašavajući jednakost pred zakonom za sve građane bez obzira na religiju. Govoreći na otvaranju nove bolničke zgrade, Yadav je izjavio da državna vlada planira uvesti UCC zakon tijekom nadolazeće sezonske sjednice Skupštine Madhya Pradesha.
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): U članku se rasprava o UCC-u opisuje kao pitanje nacionalnog jedinstva i jednakosti, u skladu s konzervativnim narativima koji naglašavaju jednorodnost i kritiziraju uočene manjinske interese.
Zašto činjenice (80): The article accurately reflects the UCC report's recommendation to exclude tribes and mentions the committee's head and the timeline for the bill. It provides quotes from the CM, which are consistent with the primary source. However, it includes a quote from the CM that is not in the original source
Zašto objektivnost (65): The article has a strong advocacy tone for the UCC, using emotive language like 'strongly backed' and 'treated equally.' It frames the UCC as a progressive move while implying criticism of the Congress party, which affects objectivity.
NDTVStranački povezanSredinaČinjenice 75Objektivnost 70prekjučer Kabinet Madhya Pradesha odobrio Uniform Civil Code BillDržavni kabinet Madhya Pradesha odobrio je zakon o uvođenju jedinstvenog građanskog zakonika (UCC), što je značajan razvoj u indijskoj pravnoj i socijalnoj politici. UCC ima za cilj zamijeniti osobne zakone zasnovane na religiji zajedničkim skupom građanskih zakona koji se primjenjuju na sve građane, bez obzira na vjersku pripadnost. Ovaj potez usklađen je s ustavnim odredbama koje zahtijevaju jedinstven građanski zakonik, iako je njegova provedba u Indiji dugotrajna rasprava zbog zabrinutosti oko vjerske slobode i kulturne osjetljivosti. Odobrenje vlade Madhya Pradesha predstavlja korak prema potencijalnom nacionalnom usvajanju takvog zakonika, što bi moglo imati široke posljedice za obiteljsko pravo, brak, nasljeđe i druga građanska pitanja diljem zemlje.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak izvješćuje o zakonodavnoj odluci koju je donijela vlada države u vezi s vrlo kontroverznim prijedlogom politike.
Zašto činjenice (75): The article briefly mentions the approval of the UCC bill but lacks detailed information about the exclusion of Adivasis and the specifics of the bill. It is somewhat less comprehensive compared to other articles.
Zašto objektivnost (70): The article is neutral in tone but lacks depth in its reporting, focusing mainly on the approval of the bill without delving into the nuances of the UCC provisions.
Scroll.inNeovisanKonzervativnoČinjenice 70Objektivnost 65jučer Kabinet Madhya Pradesha odobrio nacrt zakona o UCC-u, izuzeće od AdivasijaKabinet Madhya Pradesha odobrio je nacrt zakona o jedinstvenom građanskom zakoniku (UCC) koji ima za cilj uspostaviti zajednički skup zakona koji uređuju brak, razvod, nasljeđivanje i usvajanje za sve građane, zabranom poligamije i uvođenjem propisa za žive u odnosima. Adivasi zajednice izuzete su iz odredbi za zaštitu njihove "jedinstvene kulturne baštine i tradicionalnog načina života".
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): U članku se UCC prikazuje kao progresivna mjera koja promoviše jednakost i pravdu, u skladu s dnevnim redom BJP-a.
Zašto činjenice (70): The article accurately reports the clearance of the UCC bill and its provisions against polygamy and nikah halala. However, it lacks specific details about the exclusion of Adivasis and the constitutional exemptions, making it less comprehensive.
Zašto objektivnost (65): The article is neutral in tone but focuses primarily on the legal aspects of the UCC without addressing the broader implications or the exclusion of tribal communities.
Hindustan TimesNeovisanKonzervativnoČinjenice 70Objektivnost 60prekjučerDržavni kabinet Madhya Pradesha odobrio je Jedinstveni građanski zakonik (UCC), koji ima za cilj osigurati jednaka prava u braku, nasljeđivanju i živo-u odnosima. Zakon propisuje maksimalnu kaznu zatvora od pet godina za oženjene osobe koje se bave živo-u odnosima. Postavlja minimalnu bračnu dob od 21 za muškarce i 18 za žene, zahtijeva registraciju braka i dodjeljuje jednaka prava vlasništva sinovima i kćerkama. Scheduled Tribes i osobito ranjive plemenske skupine (PVTGs) koje žive u zaštićenim područjima izuzete su od zakona.
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): U članku se UCC prikazuje kao progresivna mjera koja promoviše jednakost i društvenu harmoniju, naglašavajući podršku muslimanskih zajednica i kritizirajući opoziciju zbog izbjegavanja savjetovanja.
Zašto činjenice (70): The article mentions the exclusion of Scheduled Tribes and PVTGs but incorrectly attributes the statement to PTI rather than the official government statement. It also includes details about punishments for live-in relationships that are not explicitly mentioned in the primary source, reducing factu
Zašto objektivnost (60): The article quotes the CM directly and presents both sides of the argument (equal rights vs. tribal exclusion) but uses emotive language like 'whether Ram or Rahim' and 'the era of triple talaq is over,' which shows a pro-UCC stance and lacks complete neutrality.
India TodayNeovisanKonzervativnoČinjenice 60Objektivnost 50prije 7 danaVlada Maharashtre, na čelu s glavnim ministrom Devendrom Fadnavisom, osnovala je sedamčlanski odbor na čelu s penzioniranom vrhovnom sudom Ranjanom Desai kako bi sastavila Uniform Civil Code (UCC) za državu. Ova inicijativa ima za cilj zamijeniti postojeće osobne zakone zasnovane na religiji jednim pravnim okvirom koji uređuje pitanja poput braka, razvoda, nasljeđivanja i nasljeđivanja. Odbor uključuje umirovljene suce, bivše dužnosnike i aktiviste, ali isključuje predstavnike manjina i marginaliziranih zajednica. Kritičari, uključujući Samajwadi Party MLA Rais Shaikh, tvrde da nedostatak raznolikosti u odboru potkopava cilj stvaranja uključivog i pravednog UCC-a.
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): Članak naglašava osnivanje odbora UCC-a od strane vlade Maharashtra pod vodstvom BJP-a, naglašavajući uključenost pojedinaca usklađenih s vladajućom strankom i RSS-om.
Zašto činjenice (60): The article discusses Maharashtra's UCC initiative, but the primary source document refers to Madhya Pradesh. This creates confusion between two different states. The article mentions a 'seven-member committee' while the primary source says the committee has multiple members but does not specify sev
Zašto objektivnost (50): The article presents the UCC proposal in a positive light, emphasizing the BJP's efforts and mentioning the RSS-linked individual. It frames the initiative as a progressive move toward uniformity without addressing potential controversies or opposition. The tone is biased in favor of the government'
The HinduNeovisanKonzervativnoprije 6 h Skupština Madhya Pradesha usvojila je UCC zakon usred slogana KongresaMadhya Pradesh zakonodavna skupština usvojila je Uniformni građanski zakon Madhya Pradesh 2026 21. srpnja 2026. godine, tijekom monsunskog zasjedanja. Prijedlog zakona ima za cilj kriminalizirati poligamiju i nikaha halala i zahtijeva registraciju odnosa u životu. Proces se dogodio usred prosvjeda kongresnih zastupnika, koji su zahtijevali da se prijedlog zakona uputi posebnom odboru. Glavni ministar Mohan Yadav kritizirao je Kongres zbog suprotstavljanja prijedlogu zakona kako bi zadovoljio muslimansku zajednicu i optužio ih da su protiv plemstva.
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): U članku se UCC zakon prikazuje kao progresivna mjera koja promoviše jednakost i pravdu, u skladu s desničarskom retorikom koja naglašava nacionalno jedinstvo i pravnu jedinstvenost.
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.
Postani podupiratelj
India
