ON
← Natrag na feed
Hessen: Mnogi ugostiteljski ugostiteljski
Germany🏛️ PolitikaSredinaprije 18 h

Hessen: Mnogi ugostiteljski ugostiteljski

U Hessenu su brojne ugostiteljske tvrtke poput hotela, penzija, kafića i restorana izbrisane ocjene na Google Maps-u. Stichprobe der Deutschen Presse-Agentur pokazala je da je gotovo jedna šestina od preko 850 analiziranih unosa imala ocjene, pri čemu se broj izbrisanih ocjena mogao razlikovati između jedne i više od 200. Od travnja 2026. godine Google čini rješenje recenzija transparentnim zbog pritužbi zbog razlike. Gisbert Kern iz Hotel- und Gaststättenverband Dehoga pozdravljava transparentnost, međutim naglašava da izbrisane ocjene ne moraju nužno biti zasnovane na nepravilnim kriterijima, već često na kršenju platforme ili nepravilnim ocjenama.

A growing number of guest accommodations in Hesse are deleting customer reviews on Google, according to a recent survey conducted by the German Press Agency (dpa). The findings reveal that nearly one-sixth of more than 850 evaluated online entries have already had their reviews removed. The number of deleted ratings varies significantly, ranging from a single review up to over 200 in some cases. This trend has become more visible since April this year, when Google began making the deletion of reviews on its Google Maps platform transparent, particularly when they were removed due to complaints about defamation. The transparency initiative was introduced by Google to address concerns about the manipulation of public opinion through online reviews. Under the new system, users can see whether a review has been deleted and the reason behind it, such as allegations of defamation. This change aims to provide greater clarity for consumers seeking information about local businesses. However, the practice of removing reviews continues to raise questions about the integrity of online feedback systems and the potential influence of business owners on public perception. Gisbert Kern, head of the Hessian branch of the Hotel and Catering Association (Dehoga), expressed cautious optimism about the increased transparency. He acknowledged that online reviews play a crucial role in decision-making for many customers and serve as a key competitive factor for hospitality businesses. “It’s correct that platforms make their handling of reviews traceable,” he stated. Yet, Kern also warned against allowing this transparency to lead to general suspicion against all businesses. “Deleted reviews don’t automatically mean a company is trying to suppress legitimate criticism,” he noted. “Often, reviews are removed because they violate platform guidelines or are proven to come from individuals who weren’t actual guests.” Kern emphasized that while the ability to delete reviews is available to businesses, it should not be used to undermine genuine customer feedback. He pointed out that Google itself provides guidance on how reviews are handled, including the criteria for removal. Despite these safeguards, the issue highlights ongoing tensions between the need for accurate information and the desire of businesses to manage their reputations effectively. The survey, which analyzed data from multiple sources, found that the majority of affected establishments are small to medium-sized businesses, including hotels, pensions, cafés, and restaurants. These businesses often rely heavily on digital presence to attract customers, and managing their online image has become increasingly complex with the rise of social media and review platforms. Some operators claim that negative reviews can harm their reputation and deter potential visitors, prompting them to take action even when the content of the reviews is valid. There is currently no official regulation governing the deletion of reviews on Google, leaving the responsibility primarily with the businesses themselves. While some argue that businesses have the right to remove inappropriate or false content, others contend that this practice undermines consumer trust and creates an uneven playing field. As the debate continues, both industry representatives and consumer advocates call for clearer guidelines to ensure fairness and accountability in the management of online reviews. Looking ahead, the situation may evolve as regulatory bodies consider the implications of widespread review deletions. In the meantime, businesses must navigate the delicate balance between protecting their reputations and maintaining the integrity of their online presence. For now, the trend suggests that the pressure to control public perception remains a significant challenge for many hospitality providers in Hesse.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Isti događaj, grupiran prema političkom nagibu medija koji su o njemu izvještavali.

Kako je izvijestila svaka strana

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Isti događaj kako se o njemu izvještavalo u drugim zemljama.

Izvještavanje u svijetu

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

Provjera tvrdnji

Ključne činjenične tvrdnje i koliko ih izvora potvrđuje odn. osporava.

Provjera tvrdnji

Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i svoj personalizirani feed Za tebe.

Postani podupiratelj

2 izvještaja

Die Zeit logoDie ZeitNeovisanSredinaČinjenice 85Objektivnost 80prije 18 h
Transparentnost ocjena: mnogi hoteli u Hessiji traže brisanje ocjena

Istraživanje Deutsche Presse-Agentur (dpa) otkrilo je da je gotovo jedna šestina od preko 850 ugostiteljskih tvrtki u Hesseu, Njemačka, imala recenzije uklonjene iz Googlea. Broj izbrisanih recenzija po tvrtki kreće se od jedne do više od 200. Od travnja 2026. godine Google je na svojoj platformi učinio vidljivim kada su recenzije uklonjene zbog pritužbi na klevetu. Gisbert Kern, voditelj udruženja hotela i restorana Dehoga u Hesseu, podržava povećanu transparentnost u vezi s rukovanjem recenzijama, ali upozorava na opću sumnju u tvrtke. Napominje da izbrisane recenzije često krše smjernice platforme ili potječuju od ne-klijenata, kako je istaknuo sam Google.

Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku su prikazani rezultati istraživanja i perspektiva predstavnika industrije, bez da se otvoreno favorizira jedna strana.U članku se uključuju izravni citati iz udruženja i upućivanja na Googleove politike, uz održavanje uravnoteženog tona.

Zašto činjenice (85): The article accurately reports on a study conducted by the Deutsche Presse-Agentur, citing specific numbers such as over 850 evaluated entries and nearly one sixth of establishments deleting reviews. It also includes quotes from the Dehoga representative, Gisbert Kern, which align with the cross-sou

Zašto objektivnost (80): The tone remains neutral, presenting both sides of the issue—acknowledging the transparency measures while noting concerns about general suspicion. There is no overt bias or emotional language, though some phrasing leans slightly toward acknowledging the complexity of the situation.

Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ) logoFrankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ)Neovisan🔒SredinaČinjenice 85Objektivnost 80prije 19 h
Hessen: Mnogi ugostiteljski ugostiteljski

U Hessenu su brojne ugostiteljske tvrtke poput hotela, penzija, kafića i restorana izbrisane ocjene na Google Maps-u. Stichprobe der Deutschen Presse-Agentur pokazala je da je gotovo jedna šestina od preko 850 analiziranih unosa imala ocjene, pri čemu se broj izbrisanih ocjena mogao razlikovati između jedne i više od 200. Od travnja 2026. godine Google čini rješenje recenzija transparentnim zbog pritužbi zbog razlike. Gisbert Kern iz Hotel- und Gaststättenverband Dehoga pozdravljava transparentnost, međutim naglašava da izbrisane ocjene ne moraju nužno biti zasnovane na nepravilnim kriterijima, već često na kršenju platforme ili nepravilnim ocjenama.

Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): The Reporting remains neutral and takes into account both the positive side of transparency and the Bedenken von Gisbert Kern. Ne prikazuje se politička stranarost, već samo činjenice i citati. Izvori su prvenstveno novinarski izvještaji i službeni podaci.

Zašto činjenice (85): This article mirrors the content of the first article, reporting the same statistics and quoting the same Dehoga representative. It confirms the findings of the dpa survey and includes the same details about Google’s policy changes. The factual claims are consistent with the cross-source consensus.

Zašto objektivnost (80): The article maintains an objective tone, presenting the facts without taking a clear stance. While it acknowledges the concern about general suspicion, it does not introduce new perspectives or biases beyond what is reported.

Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.

ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.

Postani podupiratelj

Povezane priče