On July 24, 2026, representatives of the Civil Initiative Piran (CI Piran) and municipal advisor Davorin Petaros delivered 918 signatures supporting a citizens' initiative aimed at revoking the decision by the Piran Municipal Council to sell seven parcels of land in Fiesa. This follows the earlier delivery of 921 signatures in support of a referendum on the sale of these lands, which were submitted to the municipal office on July 23, 2026. The signatures collected represent approximately 6.1 percent of eligible voters, surpassing the required five-percent threshold for triggering a referendum. The initiative seeks to prevent the sale of the land and instead designate it for public use. The dispute over the land in Fiesa has been ongoing since the municipal council approved the preliminary legal document for the sale of the parcels during its 35th regular session. The land, located near the historic coastal area of Fiesa, has long been a subject of local significance due to its ecological value and historical importance. The Civil Initiative Piran argues that the decision to sell the land contradicts the principles of democratic governance and public participation, particularly given the recent referendum in 2017, in which residents rejected a proposal to restrict development on parts of the site. According to the municipal authorities, the decision to proceed with the sale was based on the need to generate revenue for infrastructure projects, including the construction of garage houses near Piran, the relocation of vehicles from the current parking lot in Fornači, and the greenification of the area along with the renovation of the beach. Mayor Andrej Korenika emphasized that the municipality must adhere to existing spatial planning documents, which classify the land as suitable for residential construction. He stated that the sale would allow private investors to develop the properties, thereby fulfilling the municipality’s responsibility to manage urban space effectively. However, supporters of the citizens' initiative argue that the decision undermines the democratic process and fails to consider alternative uses for the land. They point to the 2017 referendum, in which residents overwhelmingly opposed proposals to limit development on the site, as evidence of public sentiment against the current plan. The initiative's leaders claim that the sale would compromise the environmental and cultural integrity of Fiesa, a protected natural area known for its unique landscape and biodiversity. The campaign to collect signatures for the referendum began shortly after the municipal council's approval of the sale. Within ten days, the group had gathered more than three times the number of signatures needed to trigger the referendum process. According to Davorin Petaros, the municipal advisor and spokesperson for the initiative, the response from the community has been overwhelming, indicating broad public opposition to the decision. He noted that the initiative aims to demonstrate that the public should have a direct say in decisions affecting their environment and heritage. The municipal administration has acknowledged the petition but maintains that the decision to sell the land falls under the category of a specific legal action rather than a general municipal act. Therefore, they argue that a referendum may not be legally permissible under current regulations. Nevertheless, the municipality has committed to consulting relevant state agencies to determine whether the law allows for the organization of such a referendum. If the legal basis exists, the city will initiate the process. Otherwise, the mayor plans to propose the repeal of the decision to the municipal council. In addition to the debate over the land sale, there have been ongoing discussions regarding the broader development of the Fiesa area. In recent months, the municipality has undertaken extensive efforts to restore and enhance the natural environment, including the removal of invasive species, replanting native trees, and improving recreational facilities. These improvements have sparked both praise and controversy among residents, highlighting the complex relationship between urban development and conservation in the region. The situation in Fiesa reflects a growing tension between local governance and civic engagement, with the citizens' initiative representing one of the strongest expressions of public dissent. As the debate continues, the outcome of this referendum could set a precedent for how future decisions involving public spaces are made in Piran. For now, the focus remains on gathering additional signatures and preparing for the formal referendum process, which could take place in the coming weeks.
8 izvještaja
918 potpisa za inicijativu građana: Fiesa treba ostati javnaČlanak izvještava o građanskoj inicijativi u Piranu u Sloveniji, čiji je cilj spriječiti prodaju sedam parcela zemljišta u Fiesi. Predstavnici Građanske inicijative Piran i vijećnik Davorin Petaros podnijeli su prošle srijede 921 potpis koji podržavaju referendum o prodaji zemljišta, a danas su dodali još 918 potpisa za inicijativu naroda za poništenje općinske odluke o prodaji zemljišta. Inicijativa nastoji ukloniti te parcele iz prodaje i dodijeliti ih za javnu upotrebu. Sakupljeni potpisi - otprilike 6,1% glasača koji imaju pravo glasa - premašuju propisani prag od pet posto. Inicijativi tvrde da je to jasna demokratska poruka stanovnika, navodeći da odluke o Fiesi trebaju donositi ljudi, a ne lokalna vlast. Naglašavaju da vijeće ne može prebaciti svoju odgovornost za odluku na referendum od prije devet godina ili na građane.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak objektivno prikazuje situaciju, usredotočujući se na prikupljanje potpisa za inicijativu naroda i argumente inicijativaca.
Zašto činjenice (85): The article continues the narrative of the signature collection, providing additional context about the legal mechanism of a citizens’ initiative and the required threshold. It is consistent with other articles and supports the factual claims made.
Zašto objektivnost (80): There is a subtle emphasis on the democratic aspect and the legitimacy of the initiative, which may influence the reader’s perception. While not overtly biased, the tone slightly favors the initiative’s position.
Bitka za Fieso tek počinje, građanska inicijativa prikuplja potpise za referendum o prodaji zemljišta (FOTO)U članku se raspravlja o tekućoj raspravi o prodaji zemljišta u Fiesi, zelenom zaljevu u blizini Pirana u Sloveniji.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku su predstavljene obje perspektive - općinske tvrdnje o nužnom razvoju i zabrinutost zajednice za kulturnu baštinu - bez da se otvoreno favorizira bilo koja strana.
Zašto činjenice (85): This article summarizes the main points of the initiative and the public response, confirming the signature count and the political implications. It aligns with the other articles and provides no contradictory information.
Zašto objektivnost (80): The language used to describe the initiative as a 'bitka' (battle) and the emphasis on public opinion may suggest a slight leaning towards the initiative’s cause, reducing objectivity.
Svet24NeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice 85Objektivnost 80prije 9 danaČlanak izvještava o sporu oko područja Fieso, gdje su stanovnici Pirana prikupili tri puta više potpisa za referendum u usporedbi s njihovim protivnicima.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): Članak naglašava uspjeh peticijskih napora stanovnika Pirana, što bi se moglo tumačiti kao podrška lokalnoj autonomiji ili protivljenje vanjskoj kontroli.
Zašto činjenice (85): The article reiterates the key facts about the signature collection and the potential referendum, maintaining consistency with previous reports. It adds context about past referendums and the current political climate, which is supported by the primary source documents indirectly.
Zašto objektivnost (80): The article presents the initiative as a significant civic effort, using emotive language such as 'bitka' (battle) which may imply a stronger stance in favor of the initiative, thus affecting objectivity.
Građanska inicijativa Piran Pirano prikupila je 921 potpis za inicijativu za raspisivanje referenduma o prodaji zemljišta u FiesiGrađanska inicijativa Piran Pirano u Građanskom vijeću Davorin Petaros jučer je podnijela 921 potpisnika za raspis referenduma o prodaji građanske zemljišta u Fiesiju. Podpisovanje je bilo posljedica odluke Građanskog vijeća, koja je u posljednjoj sjednici odobrila prethodno glasanje za prodaju sedme parcele u Fiesiju. Občinski vijeće izrazila je zadovoljstvo zbog velike podrške javnosti, ali je pokazalo, da je protivljenje prodaji zemljišta široko rasprostranjeno. Predstavnici inicijative meniju, da će referendum pokazati javno mišljenje o odluci.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se ova inicijativa opisuje kao aktivna inicijativa javnog mnijenja protiv odluke lokalnog vijeća o prodaji zemljišta u Fiesiju.
Zašto činjenice (85): The article confirms the signature count and quotes the spokesperson, Davorin Petaros, consistently with other articles. It includes additional details about the response from the public and social media reactions, which are supported by the primary source documents indirectly.
Zašto objektivnost (80): While the reporting is factual, the emphasis on public reaction and the use of emotionally charged terms like 'burno' (wildly) may suggest a slight lean towards the opposition perspective, affecting objectivity.
Da li postoji mogućnost za novi referendum o Fiesi?U članku se raspravlja o lokalnoj kontroverzi u Piranu u Sloveniji u vezi s potencijalnom prodajom sedam parcela zemljišta u području Fiese od strane općinskog vijeća. Građanska inicijativa Piran Pirano prikuplja potpise za pokretanje referenduma protiv prodaje, tvrdeći da ova zemljišta sadrže neke od najboljih vrtova u općini i trebala bi ostati u javnom vlasništvu. Općinsko vijeće odobrilo je prodaju kao dio šire strategije prodaje nekritičnih imovine uz zadržavanje ključnih zemljišta za razvoj. Odluka je donesena s 11 glasova za, 8 protiv i 4 suzdržane. Kritičari tvrde da bi prodaja mogla dovesti do gubitka zelenih površina i da inicijativa ima za cilj spriječiti daljnju urbanizaciju područja. Neki članovi vijeća sugeriraju da bi prodaja mogla biti pod utjecajem pravnih postupaka ili pritiska specifičnih interesa.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se protivljenje prodaji zemljišta opisuje kao građanska dužnost i naglašava zabrinutost zbog gubitka javnih zelenih površina i nasljeđa zajednice.
Zašto činjenice (85): This article repeats the key facts about the signature collection and includes additional context about the legal process and the percentage of voters reached. It aligns with the primary source document in terms of data privacy practices, though this is not directly relevant to the content.
Zašto objektivnost (80): The article presents the situation from the perspective of the initiative, using language that suggests strong public support. While not overtly biased, the focus on the democratic process and citizen involvement leans slightly towards the initiative’s viewpoint.
DnevnikNeovisan🔒SredinaČinjenice 80Objektivnost 85prije 8 danaGrađanska inicijativa PiranPPirano (CI) prikupila je 921 potpis koji podupiru referendum o osporavanju odluke općinskog vijeća o odobrenju nacrta pravnog dokumenta za prodaju tih zemljišta.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku se prikazuju obje perspektive: općinska uprava opravdava odluku na temelju pravnih okvira, a građanska inicijativa nastoji provesti demokratski nadzor putem referenduma.
Zašto činjenice (80): This article confirms the collection of 921 signatures for the referendum on the sale of land in Fiesa, providing similar details to the others. It includes quotes from the representative of the initiative and highlights the significance of public involvement. The information is consistent with othe
Zašto objektivnost (85): The article remains neutral, reporting the facts without taking sides. It presents the initiative's goals and outcomes objectively, without emotional language or biased framing.
Siol.netDržavni / javniProgresivnoČinjenice 80Objektivnost 75prije 9 danaInicijativa u Piranu prikupila je 921 potpis koji podržavaju referendum o prodaji općinske zemlje u Fiesiju, koji je u srijedu podnesen gradskoj vijećnici u Piranu. Inicijativa, koju predstavlja Davorin Petaros, tvrdi da bi javnost trebala odlučivati o odlukama o prostornom planiranju, kritizirajući trenutni autokratski stil vođstva općine i države. Petaros je naglasio da Zakon o prostornom planiranju zahtijeva sudjelovanje javnosti u razvojnim strategijama i upravljanju, tvrdeći da vlasti zanemaruju ovaj princip i tvrde da su građani nesposobni donositi informirane demokratske odluke.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se inicijativa opisuje kao legitimni demokratski napor protiv autoritativnog upravljanja, naglašavajući sudjelovanje javnosti i kritiku lokalnih vlasti.
Zašto činjenice (80): The article continues the discussion on the referendum initiative, confirming the number of signatures and the reasons behind the campaign. It includes quotes from the representative and explains the legal basis for public involvement. The information is consistent with other sources and is reported
Zašto objektivnost (75): While the article is generally neutral, it includes some emotionally charged language, such as 'avtokratsko vodenje,' which can be seen as subtly biased. This affects the overall objectivity score.
Građanska inicijativa prikupila je potpise za poziv na referendum o prodaji općinskih zemljišta u FiesiGrađanska inicijativa u Piranu prikupila je 921 potpis koji podržavaju referendum o prodaji općinskog zemljišta u Fiesiju, koji su podnijeli lokalnoj općini. Inicijativa se protivi predloženoj prodaji, tvrdeći da je odluka općinskog vijeća Pirana o prodaji zemljišta bila kontroverzna i nedostajalo joj je odgovarajuće sudjelovanje javnosti. Naglašavaju da demokratski procesi zahtijevaju sudjelovanje javnosti u odlukama o prostornom planiranju i upravljanju zemljom. Inicijativa ističe zabrinutost zbog isključenja građana iz donošenja odluka i kritizira trenutni pristup kao autokratski.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se problem opisuje kao demokratski deficit, kritizira isključenje javnog doprinosa u lokalnoj upravljanju i opisuje trenutni pristup kao "autokratski".
Zašto činjenice (75): The article discusses the referendum initiative in Piran regarding the sale of land in Fiesa, citing the number of signatures collected and the background of the issue. It references past referendums and the current political context. While factually correct, it contains some subjective commentary f
Zašto objektivnost (70): The tone leans toward the activist perspective, using phrases like 'avtokratsko vodenje' which carry a strong ideological charge. While the facts are presented, the language suggests a particular viewpoint, reducing overall objectivity.
★
Neka vijesti ostanu poštene.
ObjectiveNews financiraju čitatelji i bez oglasa je – pristranost vam pokazujemo, ne skrivamo. Podržite neovisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mjesec.
Postani podupiratelj
Slovenia
