IndiaThe Bombay High Court dismissed a Mumbai Police order that sought to exile a political activist, Saeed Ahmad Abdul Wahid Chaudhary, from Mumbai for organizing protests against government decisions. The court ruled that such actions do not justify externalization under Maharashtra law, as they infringe on fundamental rights. Chaudhary, a member of the Socialist Democratic Party of India, faced multiple FIRs between 2019 and 2024 related to protests over contentious issues like the Citizenship Amendment Act, NRC, and religious disputes. His legal team argued that the externment order violated his ability to engage in political activity, particularly ahead of local elections. The court emphasized that citizens have the constitutional right to protest, and police cannot banish individuals solely for exercising this right. The case highlights tensions around the use of preventive powers against political dissent.
Procjena pristranosti (Lijevo): The article frames the court's decision as a defense of civil liberties against perceived misuse of police power to suppress political dissent. It emphasizes the activist's right to protest and criticizes the use of vague charges to restrict political activity. While the court's ruling is presented,
