Subhash Chandra et Punit Goenka de Zee ont été condamnés à une amende par la SEBI et interdits de marché pendant un an.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has imposed sanctions against Zee Entertainment Enterprises (ZEEL) and its top executives, including founder-chairman Subhash Chandra and chief executive Punit Goenka. Both individuals have been fined a total of ₹14.8 million and banned from participating in the securities market for one year. Additionally, ZEEL itself has been penalized with a fine of ₹3 million and a two-month ban from the market. These measures were announced following a detailed 150-page order issued by SEBI, which outlined the findings of an investigation into alleged violations of securities laws. According to the SEBI order, the issue stemmed from the unauthorized use of ZEEL’s properties in Hyderabad as collateral for loans obtained by entities linked to large shareholders. Specifically, four entities belonging to the Essel Group secured a combined loan of ₹726 crores from Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited on December 13, 2016. The company’s assets were used without proper approval, and this arrangement was not disclosed to the board, audit committee, shareholders, or investors. SEBI emphasized that such actions violate the principles of transparency and corporate governance, as listed company assets are held in trust for all stakeholders. The regulator further stated that the ownership structure of Essel Home, which controlled the four borrowing entities, ultimately traced back to Sushila Goenka, who is identified as Noticee No. 2 in the case. She is also associated with Essel International Limited. This connection highlights the extent of influence exerted by the Goenka family over these entities, raising concerns about the separation of promoter interests from the company’s operations. SEBI’s order underscores that the misuse of company assets for the benefit of related parties constitutes a fraudulent act, violating both the SEBI Act and the Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices (PFUTP) Regulations. The regulator stressed that such practices harm investor confidence and undermine the integrity of financial markets. In its findings, SEBI concluded that the unauthorised use of ZEEL’s property as collateral was a deliberate breach of regulatory norms. This action marks another instance of heightened scrutiny by SEBI towards ZEEL, which has faced multiple allegations in recent years. These include accusations of fund mismanagement, improper related-party transactions, and lapses in corporate governance. The current penalties reflect a pattern of enforcement aimed at holding companies accountable for non-compliance with securities regulations. The fines and bans imposed on Subhash Chandra and Punit Goenka signal a firm stance by SEBI against executive misconduct and lack of oversight. While the exact implications of the one-year market ban remain unclear, it is likely to restrict their ability to hold positions in publicly traded firms during this period. Meanwhile, ZEEL’s two-month market ban could impact its capacity to engage in certain financial activities, potentially affecting its operational flexibility. As the consequences of the SEBI order unfold, the focus will shift toward how ZEEL addresses these violations internally and whether it will take steps to improve compliance and governance structures. Investors and regulators alike will be watching closely to see if the company can demonstrate meaningful reform in response to the recent enforcement actions.