Vous pourriez perdre des prestations ou faire face à la prison pour des crimes commis par vos enfants, prévient le ministre aux parents

Parents could lose benefits or face prison sentences for their children's crimes under proposed reforms to the youth justice system, a minister has warned. Youth Justice Minister Jake Richards told The Times that the system should hold parents accountable in a proportionate manner for ensuring they contribute to community safety. The reforms, announced in May, aim to strengthen Parenting Orders, which currently allow courts to mandate parents or guardians to attend counseling or face financial penalties for addressing their child's behavior. Under the new measures, parents could also face more severe consequences, including prison sentences, though Richards emphasized these would be reserved for "the most extreme cases" and left to judicial discretion. The proposals form part of broader government plans to overhaul the youth justice system, including the introduction of youth intervention courts that combine judicial oversight with support services to tackle root causes of offending. These courts would offer tailored health and education interventions for young offenders. Additionally, the government outlined a £15.4 million investment over three years to assist 12,000 children at risk of entering the youth justice system. David Lammy, the former justice secretary, introduced a Youth Justice White Paper earlier this year, advocating for increased parental accountability as a deterrent against youth crime. He stated that strengthening parenting orders would ensure "real consequences" for parents who fail to support efforts to address their children's behavior. Lammy noted that judges could step in to ensure both the child and parent receive necessary support. Currently, courts are required to consider issuing a Parenting Order when a child under 16 is convicted of an offense. They may also issue such orders for 16- and 17-year-olds if deemed beneficial in preventing further offenses. The duration of these orders cannot exceed 12 months, and breaching one is considered a criminal offense with a maximum fine of £1,000. Despite these plans, critics argue the reforms could be ineffective or counterproductive. Nikki Rutter, a sociology professor at Durham University, highlighted the link between poverty and criminal activity, warning that fining parents might exacerbate financial hardship within families. Jess Mullen, CEO of the Alliance for Youth Justice, questioned whether imprisoning parents would provide stability or support for children. Andrew Neilson of the Howard League for Penal Reform expressed concerns about the potential strain on an already overwhelmed prison system. Government data shows the use of Parenting Orders has significantly declined, from over 1,000 in 2009/10 to just 33 in 2022/23. This decline follows findings from the Southport Inquiry, which identified systemic failures in supporting the parents of the Southport killer, Axel Rudakubana, contributing to the 2024 child murders. Richards also dismissed calls to raise the age of criminal responsibility from 10, stating it would undermine public confidence in the justice system. The Bar Council has suggested raising the threshold to 14, citing concerns about the effectiveness of criminalizing minors at such a young age. The United Nations has previously noted that the UK has among the lowest ages of criminal responsibility globally and recommends raising it to at least 14.