Combattre les élections, Kangana défie CJP, dit le gouvernement élu a le droit de prendre des décisions

Kangana Ranaut, a Lok Sabha member from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), on Monday sharply criticized the opposition for disrupting parliamentary sessions, accusing them of using "arm-twisting" tactics to influence the government. Speaking to reporters outside Parliament in New Delhi, Ranaut emphasized that an elected government has the sovereign right to determine its functioning without external pressures. She argued that the primary role of Parliament is to facilitate meaningful discussions and ensure government accountability, rather than creating chaos through protests. Ranaut addressed the ongoing tensions surrounding the removal or retention of ministers and officials, stating that the government would not yield to such pressure tactics. "You cannot arm-twist the government into deciding who to sack and who to keep. This arm-twisting is not good," she said, highlighting her belief that decisions on governance should rest solely with the elected administration. In response to calls for greater transparency and accountability, Ranaut urged those seeking to influence governmental decisions to first secure a public mandate. "It is the right of the government chosen by the people to decide how to run the government. If you feel so strongly, you should stand for election yourself," she remarked, suggesting that political engagement should be through electoral processes rather than disruptive protests. Earlier in the day, the Lok Sabha session faced immediate challenges as the opposition raised concerns over alleged irregularities in the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) and the embezzlement of donations at the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust in Ayodhya. The session began with the Lok Sabha Speaker, Om Birla, paying tribute to several deceased former members of parliament, including Nadendla Bhaskara Rao and others. However, soon after, opposition members started raising slogans demanding discussions on these contentious issues. Despite repeated appeals from Speaker Birla for order and cooperation in conducting the session, the opposition continued their protests, leading to the adjournment of the House until 12 noon. The disruption highlighted the growing tensions within the legislative body as different factions pushed for their agendas during the Monsoon Session. Meanwhile, the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), led by activist Abhijeet Dipke, organized a large-scale demonstration at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi before marching toward Parliament. Thousands of students, activists, and professionals participated in the rally, demanding the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan due to allegations of irregularities in competitive exams and recurring paper leaks. The movement, which gained traction online, aimed to bring attention to perceived failures in educational governance and accountability. Dipke, however, expressed reluctance towards contesting elections, indicating that his party was not inclined to engage in electoral politics. He criticized Prime Minister Narendra Modi for not adequately addressing the concerns of students following the NEET-UG controversy. When asked directly if the CJP would contest elections, Dipke responded, "Why should we contest elections? I mean, if everyone in this country has to contest elections to demand their rights...how will it work?" His remarks underscored the group's preference for non-electoral methods of advocacy. As the Monsoon Session commenced, the political landscape appeared increasingly polarized. While the ruling party focused on maintaining legislative order and pushing forward its agenda, the opposition continued to challenge the government on key issues. The situation reflected broader national debates on governance, accountability, and the role of civil society in shaping policy decisions. The events unfolded against a backdrop of heightened political activity, with both the government and opposition preparing for potential confrontations throughout the session. The outcome of these interactions could significantly impact the legislative process and the broader political dynamics in India.