Les premiers efforts ont changé la conversation autour des terres publiques du Wyoming.

On August 18, 2025, Zach Lentsch, founder of Protect Wyoming, received a message during a climbing trip on Devils Tower that hinted at a shift in political dynamics in the state. That same day, Wyoming held its primary elections, and voter turnout was unexpectedly high. Lentsch, whose organization focuses on preserving public lands and wildlife, believed this could benefit the candidates they had backed. By nightfall, several key races showed signs of success for the candidates Protect Wyoming had endorsed. The following morning, the results confirmed that all 33 candidates supported by the group had won their races. This outcome marked a turning point for environmental advocacy in Wyoming, traditionally one of the most conservative states in the U.S. Moderate Republicans emerged victorious across multiple levels of government, including defeating members of the Freedom Caucus, a hardline faction within the state's Republican Party. According to Lentsch, this result signaled a new direction in state politics, one where supporting public lands and science-based wildlife management became essential for electoral success. Wyoming’s public lands, largely located in the western part of the state, play a critical role in both ecological preservation and the energy transition. These federally managed areas host some of the last remaining intact ecosystems in the country, vital for biodiversity and climate resilience. Under President Joe Biden, the Bureau of Land Management identified potential sites for solar development, highlighting the dual importance of these lands for conservation and renewable energy production. Following President Trump’s return to power in 2025, there was renewed push among congressional Republicans in the West to transfer public lands to state control. Proponents argued that states should have greater authority over land management, claiming that federal oversight limits local autonomy and economic opportunity. However, many Westerners, particularly in Wyoming, have resisted such efforts, fearing that transferring land to states could lead to the sale or privatization of protected areas. Public opinion in Wyoming has consistently favored retaining federal control over public lands. A recent survey found that nearly 91 percent of respondents supported keeping these lands under federal management. This sentiment reflects broader national trends, with polls showing widespread support for public lands across political lines. Protect Wyoming played a central role in this election cycle, using approximately $50,000 in donations to back a slate of candidates advocating for federal control. Unlike traditional political action committees, which often rely on large contributions, Protect Wyoming emphasized grassroots engagement. With a population of just under 600,000, Wyoming relies heavily on personal networks and community ties, making volunteer-driven outreach especially effective. Lentsch noted that the group’s strategy centered on building relationships through informal settings, such as gatherings at local breweries and door-to-door canvassing. This approach helped them secure over 400 individual donors, significantly exceeding the reach of other PACs in the state. The emphasis on volunteerism rather than financial backing allowed Protect Wyoming to mobilize a broad base of supporters, contributing to the success of the endorsed candidates. Despite the positive outcomes, Lentsch acknowledged the need for further analysis. He intended to examine county and district-level voter data to confirm whether public lands were indeed the decisive factor in each race. While the results suggest a growing alignment between environmental protection and political viability, the full implications remain to be seen. For now, the election results underscore a powerful message: in Wyoming, supporting public lands has become a key component of winning elections.