Donald Trump has vowed to continue his campaign against Iran despite growing concerns over military funding shortages within the Pentagon. Speaking from the White House alongside Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, Trump stated, “In Iran we haven’t finished yet. They haven’t seen anything yet, so far we have been nice.” His remarks came amid rising frustration over the deaths of American soldiers and a broader strategy that includes threats of a “total war” against Tehran. Trump dismissed calls for dialogue, insisting that negotiations would only occur once Iran was “ready.” The situation escalated further with cross-border raids continuing and Iran striking an Amazon data center in Bahrain. In response, Trump warned of even more intense attacks, including targeting nuclear sites the Iranians might attempt to rebuild. He also hinted at potential operations in the Red Sea should the Houthis block shipping lanes, demonstrating a willingness to escalate hostilities. The administration’s approach has placed immense pressure on the Pentagon, which is struggling to maintain its financial resources amid ongoing conflict. Pete Hegseth, the Secretary of Defense, appeared before Congress in May seeking immediate additional funding for the Department of Defense. With the summer recess approaching, there is concern that lawmakers may leave without approving the $87 billion in new funds needed to sustain current operations. This request has put Republicans in a difficult position, especially as they face mid-term elections in less than 100 days. The administration is being urged to secure support for continued military action, despite public sentiment that many Americans oppose prolonged involvement in the region. The toll of the conflict has become increasingly apparent. Since the start of hostilities, 17 U.S. troops have been killed and 100 injured in just 14 days. Despite this, Trump has shown little concern over how the war might affect domestic politics. He has attempted to justify his stance by stating, “I’m just trying to do the right thing,” aiming to reassure both his party and voters. However, he faces a critical choice: persist with the war, risking alienation among Republicans and the general public, or seek a resolution that could allow him to refocus on issues closer to home. Analysts suggest that a swift victory in Iran appears unlikely. Iranian leadership has demonstrated resilience against U.S. strikes, and intelligence assessments indicate that Tehran is unlikely to soften its stance following increased military pressure. As a result, the outlook points toward a long-term stalemate, with the possibility of an indefinite period of tension between peace and war. This scenario worries conservative factions, who believe Trump should prioritize domestic challenges rather than engage in a slow-burning conflict that risks being perceived as another “forever war.” Behind closed doors, pressure continues to mount on Trump to reduce tensions and accept a temporary ceasefire of up to 10 days. Mediators have proposed such a pause to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and establish new bases for dialogue, potentially easing pressure on Gulf allies who are increasingly concerned about their national security. While these efforts remain under consideration, the path forward remains uncertain, with the balance between military escalation and diplomatic engagement hanging in the air.
★
Gardons l’information honnête.
ObjectiveNews est financé par ses lecteurs et sans publicité : nous vous montrons le biais au lieu de le cacher. Soutenez un journalisme indépendant pour 5 €/mois.
Devenir soutien
Italy
