Les patients transgenres seront placés dans des salles en fonction de leur sexe de naissance en Angleterre

New NHS England guidance confirms that transgender patients will be placed on hospital wards corresponding to their biological sex rather than their gender identity, marking a significant policy reversal. The directive, released on Thursday, permits hospitals to legally bar trans women from female wards and trans men from male wards, drawing criticism from trans rights advocates who argue it risks deterring trans individuals from seeking medical care. This follows a prior policy allowing transgender patients to be accommodated on single-sex wards aligned with their gender identity. The updated guidance arrives nearly two months after the implementation of broader directives on single-sex spaces by Britain's rights watchdog and 18 months after a Supreme Court ruling that defined "woman" and "sex" in the Equality Act strictly in terms of biological sex, excluding transgender women with gender recognition certificates. At the time of the ruling, trans rights organizations expressed concern that it might "exclude trans people wholesale from participating in UK society." According to the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), single-sex provisions under the Equality Act must be based on biological sex. The guidance clarifies that trans men would be excluded from men-only services due to their female biological sex, and trans women from women-only services due to their male biological sex. It covers various scenarios, including single-sex hospital wards, which can lawfully exclude trans patients. The new NHS England document emphasizes that all patients should be treated with respect, dignity, compassion, and care, adding that trans individuals and others with the protected characteristic of gender reassignment should be accommodated according to their biological sex. Hospitals are instructed to identify alternative arrangements for trans patients when it would not be clinically appropriate to place them on a ward of their biological sex. In situations where clinical needs and same-sex accommodation requirements conflict, clinical needs take precedence. Such placements of trans patients on wards aligned with their gender identity are deemed rare and should be clearly documented and reported nationally as violations of the guidance. The new guidance applies to acute, mental health, and community NHS trusts, as well as NHS-funded patients in private settings, though it does not extend to A&E departments, urgent treatment centers, or pediatrics. Additional guidance for NHS England staff outlines that single-sex facilities, such as changing rooms and toilets, should be used based on biological sex. Trusts with primarily single-sex facilities are encouraged to consider providing alternatives like single-occupancy or mixed-sex facilities with individual lockable rooms to ensure privacy and dignity for all staff. They are also requested to conduct audits of their current facilities, examining aspects like communal hand-washing areas and options for privacy within single-sex facilities. These findings are intended to inform local policies, identify necessary changes, and support planning for potential capital investments. Campaign groups TransActual and Trans+ Solidarity Alliance expressed concern that the guidance prioritizes clinical judgment over blanket exclusion but leaves healthcare professionals uncertain about how to safely manage trans patients. They argued that forcing trans individuals into spaces designated for their assigned sex at birth would rarely be the most clinically appropriate decision and could deter them from accessing care. They criticized the government for failing to address the legal complexities effectively, suggesting political considerations are overshadowing patient care. The guidance was issued 18 months after the Supreme Court ruling, despite initial promises of quicker implementation. Maya Forstater, CEO and co-founder of Sex Matters, acknowledged the shift toward biological sex as a "momentous shift back to reality" but raised concerns about the lack of clarity on implementing these rules. She referenced the case of female nurses at Darlington Memorial Hospital who successfully challenged their employer in an employment tribunal after being forced to share single-sex changing rooms with a trans colleague. The tribunal ruled that the nurses faced a hostile, intimidating, humiliating, and degrading environment and advised the hospital to broaden its mindset regarding such issues. Bethany Hutchison, a nurse leading the claim, welcomed the new guidance from NHS England but emphasized the importance of ensuring NHS trusts adhere to it. She noted that the Darlington nurses should not have had to pursue legal action to secure their right to privacy, dignity, and lawful single-sex facilities. She stressed that enforcement should not rely solely on the bravery and personal sacrifices of individual employees. NHS England data indicates that breaches of the previous mixed-sex accommodation guidance have increased annually since 2021, with the latest figures showing 5,520 breaches in August 2026 compared to 3,853 in June 2025. While Sex Matters endorsed the guidance as a return to reality, Forstater voiced concerns about the practical application of the new rules, citing potential inconsistencies in patient records. TransActual and Trans+ Solidarity Alliance remain apprehensive about the feasibility of implementing the guidance in under-resourced hospitals, predicting it may lead to operational difficulties.