ON
← Retour au fil
Voici pourquoi Bakrar n'a pas eu une minute alors que Dynamo avait besoin de lui plus que jamais.
Croatia⚽ SportsCentreil y a 5 j

Voici pourquoi Bakrar n'a pas eu une minute alors que Dynamo avait besoin de lui plus que jamais.

Le premier match de la Ligue 1 de la Dinamo s'est joué sans résolution à 1 à 1 en présence de Thun, et l'une des questions les plus intéressantes après le match était de savoir pourquoi l'envoyé algérien Monsef Bakrar est resté tout le temps au club. Bien que la Dinamo ait été en retard de 20 minutes, Bakrar n'est pas entré dans le jeu.

Dinamo Zagreb's decision to bench Monsef Bakrar during their 1:1 draw with Thun in the second round of the Champions League qualifiers has raised questions among fans and analysts alike. Despite being one of the club’s key players, Bakrar did not feature in the match, even though Dinamo was trailing for much of the game. The absence of the Algerian forward, who had been expected to play a crucial role, has sparked speculation about the reasons behind his omission. The situation appears to stem from a contractual clause tied to Bakrar's deal with New York City FC. According to reports, the clause stipulates that if Bakrar were to make his tenth European appearance during his current contract period, Dinamo would have to pay an additional $100,000 to New York City. Bakrar already made nine appearances in the Europa League last season, meaning that playing against Thun would have triggered the clause. Given that his departure from Dinamo seems imminent, rumored to be moving to Egyptian side Al Ahly for around €3 million, the club opted to avoid the extra cost. This financial consideration appears to have taken precedence over tactical decisions. Coach Marija Kovačević did not bring Bakrar into the game despite Dinamo's need for a goal, instead opting for substitutes such as Fran Topić and Lucas Kačavenda. Topić's late contribution led to the equalizer through Mihal Zajc, securing a draw that will likely benefit Dinamo in the return leg at Maksimir. Bakrar arrived at Dinamo last summer from New York City for approximately €1 million. He quickly became a vital part of the team, making 42 appearances last season and scoring 18 goals while adding seven assists. His performances were particularly notable after Mateo Lisica suffered from mononucleosis, which saw Bakrar emerge as the primary option on the right flank. However, with Lisica now back in action, Bakrar's position within the squad has become less secure. Despite his contributions, Bakrar is now reportedly on the verge of leaving Dinamo. The club is expected to finalize his move to Al Ahly soon, and the decision to keep him on the bench against Thun suggests that management is prioritizing cost savings ahead of the transfer. This approach could prevent further financial obligations to New York City, especially since Bakrar might still be available for the return fixture, depending on the club's strategy. Meanwhile, another player has emerged as a potential target for Dinamo and other clubs. Slovenian defender Matija Kuzmić, currently playing for Danish side Viborg, has attracted interest from several top-tier teams. Kuzmić, 22 years old, recently earned his first start for Slovenia under new coach Boštjan Cesar, signaling his growing importance in the national team setup. His versatility, able to play both right-back and center-back positions, makes him an attractive prospect for clubs looking to strengthen their defensive lines. Viborg, where Kuzmić has spent the past year, is entering a critical phase as the player’s contract is set to expire in a year. The Danish club expects a substantial fee for his services, potentially upwards of €1 million. Earlier discussions between Dinamo and Viborg had stalled due to financial discrepancies, with Viborg initially demanding €2.5 million and Dinamo offering up to €1.3 million. However, recent developments suggest that the market value of Kuzmić has risen significantly. Interest in Kuzmić has expanded beyond Dinamo. French Ligue 1 side Toulouse, owned by American investment fund RedBird, has shown interest, as has Nottingham Forest, a Premier League club controlled by Greek billionaire Evangelos Marinakis. The latter's ownership also includes Olympiacos and Portuguese club Rio Ave, indicating a broader network of potential suitors. A move to the Premier League would represent a major step forward for Kuzmić, elevating his career to one of football’s most competitive leagues. With multiple clubs showing interest, Kuzmić’s future looks increasingly uncertain. While Dinamo had previously pursued him, the emergence of stronger financial offers from higher-profile clubs complicates the situation. If Nottingham Forest makes a serious bid, Kuzmić could find himself heading to England, marking a significant shift in his professional trajectory. For now, however, the focus remains on whether Dinamo can secure a deal that aligns with both its financial constraints and sporting ambitions.

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Le même événement, regroupé selon l’orientation politique des médias qui le couvrent.

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et votre fil Pour vous personnalisé.

Devenir soutien

Couverture dans le monde

Le même événement tel que rapporté dans d’autres pays.

Couverture dans le monde

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et votre fil Pour vous personnalisé.

Devenir soutien

Vérification des affirmations

Les principales affirmations factuelles et combien de sources les confirment ou les contestent.

Vérification des affirmations

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et votre fil Pour vous personnalisé.

Devenir soutien

Aller aux sources primaires (2)

Les sources officielles sur lesquelles repose la couverture. Lisez-les directement pour contourner le cadrage.

3 articles

Jutarnji list logoJutarnji listIndépendantCentreFactualité 85Objectivité 80il y a 10 j
Voici pourquoi Bakrar n'a pas eu une minute alors que Dynamo avait besoin de lui plus que jamais.

Le premier match de la Ligue 1 de la Dinamo s'est joué sans résolution à 1 à 1 en présence de Thun, et l'une des questions les plus intéressantes après le match était de savoir pourquoi l'envoyé algérien Monsef Bakrar est resté tout le temps au club. Bien que la Dinamo ait été en retard de 20 minutes, Bakrar n'est pas entré dans le jeu.

Lecture du biais (Centre): L'article traite d'une décision liée au sport concernant la sélection des joueurs dans un match de football, qui n'implique pas de questions politiques, d'idéologies ou de politique publique.

Pourquoi factualité (85): The article explains why Bakrar did not play, citing the contract clause related to the additional payment if he reached ten European appearances. This aligns with the consensus from other sources.

Pourquoi objectivité (80): The tone is neutral and factual, explaining the decision based on contractual obligations. It avoids emotional language and presents the situation objectively.

Index.hr logoIndex.hrIndépendantCentreFactualité 85Objectivité 75il y a 13 j
Bakrar était sur le point de signer pour Al Ahly.

L'attaquant algérien Monsef Bakrar, qui était en train de passer du Dinama de Croatie à l'Al Ahly égyptien, a reçu une offre inattendue de Getafe de la première ligue espagnole. Getafe lui a offert une prime fixe de 3,5 millions d'euros, un contrat de trois ans avec l'option de produire une quatrième saison et un salaire annuel de 1,2 millions d'euros. Le transfert d'Al Ahly avait déjà été convenu, mais Dinamo a refusé de conclure un accord pour que Bakrara puisse jouer contre la Suisse Thuna avec les qualifications de la Ligue des champions.

Lecture du biais (Centre): Le processus de transfert de personnel et les différentes tentatives de transfert de personnel de Bakrara peuvent être considérés comme politiquement pertinents, mais l'article ne présente pas clairement une approche étrangère.

Pourquoi factualité (85): Article reports on Monsef Bakrar’s potential transfer from Dinamo to Al Ahly, citing an exclusive source from Africafoot. It mentions a new offer from Getafe and details the previous agreement with Al Ahly. While there is no primary source, the information aligns with cross-source consensus regardin

Pourquoi objectivité (75): The article presents the transfer situation with some bias towards Al Ahly, emphasizing Bakrar’s preference for them despite financial offers from Getafe. There is a slight editorial tone when discussing his personal desires and the club’s stance.

tportal logotportalIndépendantCentreFactualité 70Objectivité 60il y a 5 j
Le Slovène est devenu un succès: il était recherché par Dinamo, et il pourrait finir en Premier League.

Le défenseur slovène de droite Srdan Kuzmić, qui a développé sa carrière au Danemark Viborg, s'est intéressé à plusieurs clubs, dont le club croate Dinamo, le club français Toulouse et le club anglais Nottingham Forest. Kuzmić, joueur de 22 ans qui a déménagé à Iliriju i Muru, en 2023. année est allé à Viborg, où il a été opposé à un joueur de droite qui peut jouer à n'importe quelle position.

Lecture du biais (Centre): L'article se concentre sur le contenu lié au sport concernant le transfert potentiel d'un joueur de football, qui est considéré comme apolitique.

Pourquoi factualité (70): This article shifts focus to other players like Kristijan Jakić and continues the transfer saga around Dominik Livaković, which is unrelated to the primary source document. It includes speculative information and lacks alignment with the primary source content about Kuzmić.

Pourquoi objectivité (60): The article presents information in a biased manner, focusing on ongoing rumors and speculation rather than offering a balanced perspective. It leans towards reporting on the uncertain future of Livaković without clear neutrality.

Gardons l’information honnête.

ObjectiveNews est financé par ses lecteurs et sans publicité : nous vous montrons le biais au lieu de le cacher. Soutenez un journalisme indépendant pour 5 €/mois.

Devenir soutien

Sujets liés