ON
← Retour au fil
Les députés se sentent menacés, mais Sukić dit: "Si je voulais le viser, croyez-moi, je le tuerais aussi"
Slovenia🏛️ PolitiqueCentreil y a 13 h

Les députés se sentent menacés, mais Sukić dit: "Si je voulais le viser, croyez-moi, je le tuerais aussi"

Nataša Sukič, députée de gauche du Parti de gauche, est membre du comité de travail de l'Office national de la défense (DZ) sous la direction du président Žana Mahniča (SDS). La décision a suscité un débat sur la sécurité dans les salles du Parlement, a déclaré Katja Kokot (Resnica). Elle a été invitée à dévoiler la somme des peines infligées par les actes de violence et a demandé la mise en place d'une sanction.

An ethical committee will examine the actions of Left Party MP Nataša Sukič after she threw a book at the chairperson of the National Assembly during a session. The move has sparked mixed reactions among politicians and members of the public. According to reports, Sukič claims her action was symbolic and did not intend to harm anyone. Meanwhile, Resnica MP Katja Kokot has called for formal charges against Sukič for alleged threats involving weapons, stating she feels unsafe in the parliamentary building. Kokot accused Sukič of threatening to use weapons and throwing the book toward the chairperson of the session, Žan Mahnič (SDS). She emphasized that she does not feel safe anymore in the premises of the National Assembly and demanded sanctions and the restoration of order within the institution. “I personally feel threatened and do not want to sit in the same room with someone who commits such acts,” Kokot stated. Sukič defended her actions, describing them as a symbolic gesture meant to highlight the lack of respect for the parliamentary rulebook. “It was a somewhat angry act, but I certainly didn’t target him,” she said. “If I had wanted to hit him, I would have done so.” She argued that Mahnič had no authority to put a procedural motion to a vote to prevent the session from taking place. Sukič described the book as the “bible of parliament” and claimed it was not being respected. In response to accusations of making threats with weapons, Sukič cited a quote from Bertolt Brecht: “A book is a weapon, take it in hand.” She explained that as a pacifist, humanist, and anti-militarist, she considered the book as a legitimate democratic tool. “For me, the book is our legal democratic weapon,” she added. Sukič insisted that she stood behind her actions and did not threaten anyone. She challenged Kokot and President of the Resnica party and the National Assembly, Zoran Stevanović, to file criminal charges against her if they felt threatened. Sukič criticized their behavior, accusing them of using the parliament for their political games. She also accused Kokot of publicly defaming others and inciting hatred through a social media post reading “Babi se je ftrgalo.” The reaction to Sukič’s actions has been varied. Jelka Godec, leader of the SDS MPs, supported Kokot and argued that throwing objects at someone, whether intending to hit them or not, constitutes violent conduct. She pointed out that in previous mandates, opposition members used language as a weapon but never physically attacked anyone in the parliament. “Do not accuse us of things we ourselves have done,” she urged. Borut Sajović, leader of the Freedom party MPs, viewed Sukič’s move as symbolic. He noted that Sukič highlighted a problem in the current mandate within the assembly. He praised Mahnič for accepting the gesture with humor and dignity. Sajović doubted that Mahnič, known for his outdoor activities, was frightened by Sukič's action. However, he stressed the need to avoid such incidents and emphasized the importance of respecting the parliamentary rules. Mojca Žnidarič (Democrats) praised Mahnič for turning the situation into a joke but criticized the overall behavior in the National Assembly. Democrats condemned similar actions and expressed disappointment over the conduct observed in the assembly. The ethical committee will consider the incident, according to the requests made by Kokot and the demands raised by other parties. Sukič agreed to the examination by the ethical committee, acknowledging that her move went beyond established norms and stirred both the parliament and the public. She believes each person has their perspective on this action and that her voters see it differently.

Comment ce reportage a été réalisé. Actualité objective a rédigé ce reportage à partir de 2 articles sources, avec une synthèse assistée par IA selon notre méthodologie. C'est notre propre texte, pas la copie d'un média. Lire notre méthodologie.

Rédacteur responsable: Matej BašaUne erreur ? Signalez-la

2 articles

Maribor24 logoMaribor24IndépendantCentreFactualité 95Objectivité 89il y a 14 h
Les députés se sentent menacés, mais Sukić dit: "Si je voulais le viser, croyez-moi, je le tuerais aussi"

Nataša Sukič, députée de gauche du Parti de gauche, est membre du comité de travail de l'Office national de la défense (DZ) sous la direction du président Žana Mahniča (SDS). La décision a suscité un débat sur la sécurité dans les salles du Parlement, a déclaré Katja Kokot (Resnica). Elle a été invitée à dévoiler la somme des peines infligées par les actes de violence et a demandé la mise en place d'une sanction.

Lecture du biais (Centre): L'article présente les deux perspectives, les affirmations de Kokot de se sentir en danger et d'appeler à des mesures disciplinaires, et la défense de Sukič de son geste symbolique, sans favoriser ouvertement un côté.

Pourquoi factualité (95): This article closely aligns with the first in terms of factual content, accurately reporting the situation involving Sukičeva's symbolic act, Kokot's allegations of threats, and Sukičeva's response. It includes direct quotes and contextual details about the parliamentary session and the ethical revi

Pourquoi objectivité (89): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting both perspectives without overt bias. It avoids strong emotive language but does include some direct quotes that may reflect personal views. The overall balance between the two positions is maintained effectively.

Dnevnik logoDnevnikIndépendant🔒CentreFactualité 93Objectivité 87il y a 13 h
La commission d'éthique examinera-t-elle le projet de règlement de Sukić ?

La députée Katja Kokot (Resnica) a demandé à ce que Sukičeva obtienne une attestation de violences policières, mais elle a refusé. Sukičeva n'a pas accepté l'offre, mais elle a déclaré que le symbole de la violence démocratique n'était pas une menace pour personne.

Lecture du biais (Centre): L'article présente les deux perspectives: Sukičeva affirme que son action était symbolique et non menaçante, tandis que Kokot l'accuse de comportement menaçant.

Pourquoi factualité (93): The article accurately reports that the ethical committee will review Sukičeva's actions, citing Kokot's call for formal notification of potential assault and Sukičeva's claim that her action was symbolic. It includes direct quotes from both parties and provides context about the parliamentary sessi

Pourquoi objectivité (87): The article presents both sides fairly, quoting Kokot's concerns about safety and Sukičeva's defense of her symbolic gesture. However, the phrasing 'mešani odzivi' (mixed reactions) introduces a slight subjective interpretation rather than strictly reporting facts. Overall, the tone remains neutral

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Le même événement, regroupé selon l’orientation politique des médias qui le couvrent.

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et toutes les autres fonctions pour les soutiens.

Devenir soutien

Couverture dans le monde

Le même événement tel que rapporté dans d’autres pays.

Couverture dans le monde

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et toutes les autres fonctions pour les soutiens.

Devenir soutien

Vérification des affirmations

Les principales affirmations factuelles et combien de sources les confirment ou les contestent.

Vérification des affirmations

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et toutes les autres fonctions pour les soutiens.

Devenir soutien

Gardons l’information honnête.

ObjectiveNews est financé par ses lecteurs et sans publicité : nous vous montrons le biais au lieu de le cacher. Soutenez un journalisme indépendant pour 4 €/mois.

Devenir soutien

Sujets liés