The trial of former leaders of the Kosovo Liberation Army (UÇK) has been postponed once again, this time until July 16. The Special Chambers of Kosovo have announced that the first-instance verdict against Hashim Thaçi, Kadri Veseli, Jakup Krasniqi, and Rexhep Selimi will now be delivered on July 16 at 10:00 AM. This decision follows an evaluation by the Trial Chamber, which stated that extending the deadline was absolutely necessary due to the complexity of the case and the volume of evidence that needed to be reviewed. The Trial Chamber has received testimony and evidence from approximately 270 witnesses (oral and written), accepted 5,467 pieces of physical evidence, and the court transcript contains 29,238 pages. The extension was deemed essential to ensure a reasoned, comprehensive, and fair assessment of the evidence, as well as to provide a detailed written justification reflecting these findings accurately.
The postponement comes amid ongoing public and political pressure surrounding the trial. The process has already spanned nearly six years of pre-trial detention and a multi-year judicial procedure. The delay has sparked concerns about fairness and justice, particularly among supporters of the accused who argue that the prolonged proceedings undermine their rights and dignity. The Trial Chamber emphasized the need for thoroughness, but critics claim that the delays reflect systemic issues within the judicial system handling the case.
Supporters of the former UÇK leaders have continued to organize protests in various countries, including Croatia, where another demonstration is planned for May 5. These protests aim to highlight what they perceive as injustice in the trial process. Gazmend Syla, Deputy Chairman of the Organization of Veterans of the UÇK War, expressed confidence that the upcoming protest in Croatia would be as large as previous demonstrations held in Skopje, Pristina, The Hague, Tirana, and Strasbourg. He emphasized that the protests are not only about demanding justice for the accused but also about ensuring transparency and fairness throughout the legal process. Syla warned that there are fears regarding the final verdict, given the perception of bias during the trial.
In addition to the protests, questions have arisen about the legitimacy of certain individuals' involvement in the UÇK. Dritan Goxhaj, known as a protest leader in Albania, claimed to have participated in the UÇK war. However, Syla clarified that Goxhaj does not appear in the records of the Organization of Veterans of the UÇK War. According to Syla, Goxhaj is not listed as a participant in any brigade, battalion, or operational zone during the conflict. This discrepancy has led to further scrutiny and debate over the accuracy of claims made by individuals involved in the protests.
Political reactions to the postponement have also been significant. The Democratic Party of Kosovo (PDK) criticized the decision, calling it a deepening of injustice against the former UÇK leaders. In its statement, the PDK expressed concern over the extended period of pre-trial detention and the lengthy judicial process, arguing that the delay goes beyond procedural delays and instead reflects an unjustified prolongation that undermines trust in the judiciary. The party emphasized that the trial must be based solely on law, verified facts, and high standards of justice, rejecting any unsubstantiated claims raised during the process. It reiterated its stance that the UÇK's war was just and liberating, a historical truth that cannot be altered by judicial processes or ongoing delays.
The PDK called for an end to this long-standing injustice and expressed hope that justice would prevail so that the former UÇK leaders could return freely to Kosovo, reuniting with their families and fellow citizens. As the trial approaches its next scheduled date, all parties remain engaged in the discourse around justice, fairness, and the legacy of the UÇK war. The outcome of the trial continues to be a focal point for both legal and political discussions, with implications that extend far beyond the courtroom.
3 articles
RTKPublic / d’ÉtatCentreFactualité 95Objectivité 90il y a 4 jLes Chambres spécialisées du Kosovo ont annoncé un retard dans le verdict de première instance pour les anciens dirigeants de l'Armée de libération du Kosovo (UÇK), dont Hashim Thaçi, Kadri Veseli, Jakup Krasniqi et Rexhep Selimi, repoussant la date au 16 septembre à 10h00. L'organe judiciaire a expliqué que la prolongation était nécessaire en raison de la complexité de l'affaire et du volume de preuves à examiner.
Lecture du biais (Centre): L'article présente le raisonnement de la cour pour le verdict retardé d'une manière neutre, en se concentrant sur la nécessité procédurale et les exigences de preuve. Il n'y a pas de cadrage idéologique ouvert ou d'accent sur des récits politiques spécifiques.
Pourquoi ces scores (Factualité 95 · Objectivité 90): Highly factual with specific details about the court's decision to extend the deadline, citing procedural complexity and evidence volume. The tone remains neutral and informative.
Koha.netIndépendantGaucheFactualité 90Objectivité 85il y a 6 jGazmend Syla, Deputy Chairman of the Organization of Veterans of the Kosovo Liberation Army (UÇK), expressed expectations that the upcoming protest in Croatia would be as large as previous demonstrations held in defense of former UÇK leaders currently on trial in The Hague. These protests aim to highlight concerns over perceived injustice in the trial process. Syla emphasized that while they do not claim innocence for the accused, they strongly oppose any unfairness in the proceedings. Previous protests were organized in Skopje, Pristina, The Hague, Tirana, and Strasbourg. The four former UÇK leaders—Hashim Thaçi, Kadri Veseli, Jakup Krasniqi, and Rexhep Selimi—are under investigation by the Specialist Prosecutor’s Office since November 2020 but have declared their innocence. Additionally, Syla mentioned that Dritan Goxhaj does not appear in the organization's database as a UÇK fighter, despite claims by Goxhaj himself and others.
Lecture du biais (Gauche): The article frames the protests as a response to perceived injustice in the trial of former UÇK leaders, emphasizing opposition to unfairness rather than directly addressing legal arguments. It highlights the organizers' stance against bias in the judicial process, which aligns with a left-leaning,抗
Pourquoi ces scores (Factualité 90 · Objectivité 85): The article discusses expectations for a large protest in Croatia supporting former UÇK leaders. It quotes Syla and outlines plans for the demonstration without taking sides. Information is presented clearly and objectively, focusing on organizational details and goals. Cross-source consensus suppor
RTKPublic / d’ÉtatGaucheFactualité 85Objectivité 65il y a 4 j PDK réagit après le report du procès à La HayeLe Parti démocratique et kosovar (PDK) a réagi au retard dans la publication du verdict final dans l'affaire contre les anciens dirigeants de l'Armée de libération du Kosovo (UÇK) devant les tribunaux spéciaux de La Haye. Le PDK condamne la décision comme une attaque injuste contre ces personnes, arguant qu'après six ans de détention provisoire et un long processus judiciaire, le retard s'est transformé en un rejet injuste de leur confiance en la justice. Le parti demande que le verdict final soit fondé uniquement sur la loi, les faits vérifiés et les normes de justice les plus élevées, rejetant toute réclamation infondée faite au cours du processus. Le PDK réaffirme sa position que la guerre menée par l'Armée de libération du Kosovo était une lutte juste et légitime pour la liberté du peuple du Kosovo, qui ne peut être effacée ou minimisée par aucune procédure judiciaire.
Lecture du biais (Gauche): L'article présente la réponse du PDK comme une défense de l'équité et de la justice juridiques, mettant l'accent sur la légitimité des actions de l'Armée de libération du Kosovo et critiquant le processus judiciaire comme étant politiquement motivé.
Pourquoi ces scores (Factualité 85 · Objectivité 65): Factual but clearly biased in favor of the accused, using strong language like 'theft of justice' and framing the delay as unjust. Lacks balance in presenting opposing viewpoints.
★
Gardons l’information honnête.
ObjectiveNews est financé par ses lecteurs et sans publicité : nous vous montrons le biais au lieu de le cacher. Soutenez un journalisme indépendant pour 5 €/mois.
Devenir soutien
XK
%2Ffile%2Fauthors%2F5235797431519000504.jpg&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)
