Une mère qui a tué sa fille de 3 ans a été condamnée à 13 ans de prison.

A woman in her 30s has been sentenced to 13 years in prison for the 2020 murder of her 3-year-old daughter. The verdict was delivered by the Ansan branch of the Suwon District Court in Gyeonggi Province on Tuesday. The court found the defendant guilty of murder, abandonment of a body, and other charges linked to the killing. Her boyfriend, who assisted in disposing of the child’s body, received a 10-year prison term for being an accomplice to the crime. The incident occurred in 2020 when the mother strangled her daughter at home. With the help of her boyfriend, she attempted to conceal the crime by discarding the child’s body at a nearby mountain. The mother had previously tried to hide the death by delaying the girl’s enrollment in school and temporarily substituting the child with her partner’s niece. However, the school became suspicious of the arrangement and eventually alerted the authorities. The court emphasized the vulnerability of children during this stage of life, noting that they depend entirely on their guardians. In its ruling, it stated that the victim, a 3-year-old, was unable to protect herself or comprehend the concept of death. The judge described the act as particularly heinous due to the innocence and dependence of the child. The defendant initially claimed she had discovered the child’s body, but later confessed to strangling her. During the trial, she explained that the child had become a “burden” following her separation from the child’s father. She also expressed blame toward the child for her personal struggles and failed marriage. Following the conviction, the court imposed additional restrictions on the defendant. She will be barred from working in any capacity involving children for a period of 10 years after her release from prison. This measure aims to prevent future harm to minors and ensure public safety. The case has sparked discussions about the psychological factors contributing to such crimes and the importance of early intervention in family disputes. Legal experts noted that the severity of the punishment reflects the gravity of the offense, especially given the child’s young age and the method used to commit the crime. Authorities have confirmed that the investigation into the case was thorough, leading to the identification of both the perpetrator and her accomplice. The school’s role in uncovering the deception underscores the necessity of vigilance within educational institutions regarding unusual circumstances involving students. The defendant’s actions have left a lasting impact on the community, prompting calls for greater awareness of signs of abuse and neglect. While the legal proceedings have concluded, the emotional toll on the victims' families and the broader society remains profound. The case serves as a stark reminder of the need for support systems for individuals facing domestic challenges.