The U.S. immigration court system is under unprecedented strain, with case backlogs worsening and deportation orders rising sharply. The administration of former President Donald Trump has intensified efforts to speed up processing, leading to longer daily dockets and shorter preparation times for immigrants seeking asylum. As a result, more individuals are missing hearings and facing automatic removals, while fewer cases are being thoroughly reviewed. This surge in deportations reflects a broader shift toward expedited removal procedures, which have become central to the current administration’s approach to immigration enforcement. According to reports from the Associated Press, the federal government has significantly increased the pace of immigration court proceedings, particularly through the use of “megaaudiencias,” or mass hearings, where a single judge handles over 50 cases in a single day. These high-volume sessions have become routine, especially since June 2026, when over 1,300 such hearings were conducted nationwide, triple the number recorded in the same period the previous year. The strategy aims to reduce decades-long delays in processing millions of pending cases, but it has come at a steep cost for those affected. The time allowed for immigrants to prepare their defense has been drastically cut. Previously, many had six months to gather documents, secure legal representation, and build their case. Now, this window has shrunk to just over a month. This compression has led to a sharp rise in missed hearings, with data from Mobile Pathways showing that nearly 40% of scheduled appearances went unattended by June 2026, a doubling from the 20% rate observed in January 2025. As a consequence, many cases are closed before they can even be properly examined, often resulting in automatic deportation orders. Once issued, these orders typically render asylum applications null and void. In January 2025, approximately 33,000 deportation orders were handed down, but by June 2026, that figure had risen to around 79,000. The rapid increase underscores how the new procedural framework has shifted the balance of power away from individual rights and toward administrative efficiency. Legal experts warn that this trend could lead to a systemic erosion of due process, as cases move through the system without adequate scrutiny. The impact is visible in the physical spaces where these processes unfold. In Harlingen, Texas, for example, the sheer volume of attendees during megaaudiencias has caused long lines and overcrowding at immigration courts. Some individuals spend hours waiting outside before even entering the building, highlighting the logistical challenges created by the accelerated schedule. Meanwhile, the emotional toll on those caught in the system is profound, as evidenced by recent cases involving families and individuals who face sudden and severe disruption to their lives. One such case involves Iliana Lick, a 30-year-old Argentine woman living in Philadelphia. She was arrested by ICE agents at the airport on July 11, 2026, while attempting to travel to watch a World Cup match. Despite having entered the country legally and maintaining her tax obligations, she was detained for violating her visa terms. Her case highlights the growing reliance on airport checkpoints to enforce immigration rules, a tactic that has expanded dramatically under the current administration. Over the past two months, ICE has averaged between 20 and 40 arrests per day at U.S. airports, compared to less than 10 in May 2025. Local leaders, including New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani, have voiced strong opposition to these policies. Mamdani has repeatedly criticized the tactics used by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), calling them “crueles” and “inhumanas.” He has argued that such measures do little to enhance public safety and instead create unnecessary hardship for residents, regardless of their legal status. Mamdani has also ruled out cooperation with ICE operations within city limits, asserting that federal agents must obtain a judicial order before entering private property. His stance reflects a broader push among local officials to protect immigrant communities from aggressive enforcement strategies. In addition to condemning specific actions, Mamdani has proposed sweeping reforms, including the complete abolition of ICE as an operational entity. He advocates for a more humane immigration system that prioritizes integration over punishment. Such calls for structural change reflect growing concerns about the long-term consequences of the current enforcement model, both for individuals and for the broader social fabric of American society.
★
Gardons l’information honnête.
ObjectiveNews est financé par ses lecteurs et sans publicité : nous vous montrons le biais au lieu de le cacher. Soutenez un journalisme indépendant pour 4 €/mois.
Devenir soutien
AR
