ON
← Retour au fil
Justice Department defends decision not to release, unredact more Epstein files
United States🏛️ Politiqueil y a 17 h

Justice Department defends decision not to release, unredact more Epstein files

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has refused to release additional unredacted records from its investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, arguing that it has already fulfilled legal obligations under the Epstein Files Transparency Act (EFTA). In a filing with Federal District Judge Emmet Sullivan, the DOJ cited exemptions allowing it to withhold sensitive information, such as victims' personal identifying information (PII), to protect ongoing investigations and privacy. The documents in question include emails between Epstein and individuals discussing 'torture videos' and allegations involving former President Donald Trump. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche emphasized that releasing unredacted versions would contradict the EFTA's intent and highlighted technical challenges in producing certain materials. The DOJ also requested a 60-day extension to consider potential appeals. This stance follows a lawsuit by journalist Katie Phang, who alleges the DOJ has violated transparency laws by withholding information.

Aller aux sources primaires (2)

Les sources officielles sur lesquelles repose la couverture. Lisez-les directement pour contourner le cadrage.

1 articles

The Hill logoThe HillIndépendantDroiteFactualité 85Objectivité 75il y a 17 h
Justice Department defends decision not to release, unredact more Epstein files

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has refused to release additional unredacted records from its investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, arguing that it has already fulfilled legal obligations under the Epstein Files Transparency Act (EFTA). In a filing with Federal District Judge Emmet Sullivan, the DOJ cited exemptions allowing it to withhold sensitive information, such as victims' personal identifying information (PII), to protect ongoing investigations and privacy. The documents in question include emails between Epstein and individuals discussing 'torture videos' and allegations involving former President Donald Trump. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche emphasized that releasing unredacted versions would contradict the EFTA's intent and highlighted technical challenges in producing certain materials. The DOJ also requested a 60-day extension to consider potential appeals. This stance follows a lawsuit by journalist Katie Phang, who alleges the DOJ has violated transparency laws by withholding information.

Lecture du biais (Droite): The article frames the DOJ's refusal to release unredacted records as legally justified and consistent with protecting victims and ongoing investigations. While the subject involves a high-profile case with significant public interest, the framing emphasizes the DOJ's legal arguments and downplays质疑

Pourquoi ces scores (Factualité 85 · Objectivité 75): The article presents facts accurately based on the DOJ's legal arguments and the EFTA provisions. However, it includes some interpretive language such as 'disturbing on their face' which may imply judgment.

Gardons l’information honnête.

ObjectiveNews est financé par ses lecteurs et sans publicité : nous vous montrons le biais au lieu de le cacher. Soutenez un journalisme indépendant pour 5 €/mois.

Devenir soutien

Sujets liés