ON
← Retour au fil
Pour une prise d'argent facile: pourquoi Jetstar facture aux clients les bagages à main
United Kingdom🏛️ PolitiqueCentreil y a 10 h

Pour une prise d'argent facile: pourquoi Jetstar facture aux clients les bagages à main

Jetstar, une compagnie aérienne à bas prix sous Qantas, a introduit une nouvelle politique de facturation des bagages à main, rejoignant d'autres compagnies aériennes dans la monétisation des services de voyage de base. À partir de l'année prochaine, les passagers ne recevront qu'un "sac sous le siège" gratuitement, tandis que les bagages à main plus gros encourront des frais supplémentaires.

Jetstar, Australia's budget airline, has announced a new policy that will see passengers charged for carrying-on luggage starting next year, marking a significant shift in how the company structures its pricing model. The move comes amid growing criticism that airlines are increasingly relying on ancillary fees to boost revenue rather than offering transparent, all-inclusive fares. Under the new rules, only one "under seat bag", such as a backpack, handbag, or laptop bag, will be included in ticket prices, while any additional carry-on items will incur extra charges. The decision follows a broader trend among airlines globally to introduce more fees for services previously considered standard. Jetstar joins a list of carriers that have shifted toward a "user-pay" model, where base fares remain low but additional costs are layered onto the booking process. This includes charges for checked baggage, preferred seating, meal options, and even the ability to cancel flights. In some cases, airlines have gone so far as to allow passengers to pay for the privilege of sitting next to an empty seat, effectively monetizing unused capacity. Consumer advocates have criticized the move, arguing that it makes it harder for travelers to accurately compare prices across different airlines. Graeme Hughes, a consumer expert and adjunct associate professor at Griffith University, noted that the new policy allows Jetstar to advertise the lowest possible fare upfront while hiding additional costs until later stages of the booking process. "Travellers can't easily do an apple-for-apple comparison with other airfares," he said, highlighting concerns about transparency and fairness. Andy Kelly, campaigns director at the Australian consumer advocacy group Choice, described the policy as "just an easy cash grab." He pointed out that existing fees for things like seat selection, cancellation rights, and loyalty program memberships already add up significantly. "They just make it really hard for consumers to make an assessment of value and also to compare different products," Kelly said. The issue has drawn attention beyond Australia, particularly in Europe, where regulators have pushed for greater transparency in airline pricing. Recently, the European Union mandated that airlines must include carry-on luggage fees in initial fare displays, making it easier for consumers to compare prices. This came after airlines resisted earlier proposals to allow free carry-on bags alongside under-seat items. Jetstar cited this regulatory environment as part of its rationale for adopting a size-based carry-on baggage model, claiming it aligns with practices used by low-fare carriers worldwide. Jetstar emphasized that the new policy would help keep fares low by allowing passengers to pay only for what they need. However, critics argue that the airline is simply following the lead of international competitors, many of whom already impose fees for carry-on luggage. Dr. Ian Douglas, an honorary senior lecturer at the University of New South Wales' School of Aviation, noted that nearly every low-cost carrier in Europe, including Ryanair and EasyJet, charges for carry-on bags. He expressed disappointment that Jetstar had adopted a model akin to Ryanair's despite being positioned as a complementary service within the Qantas network. According to Guardian Australia analysis, the cost of carrying an overhead bag on an overseas Jetstar flight could exceed $100, depending on the route. For domestic flights, the fees are lower but still represent an added expense for travelers who wish to bring more than a single under-seat bag. Jetstar has indicated that the exact fees may vary based on flight duration and has acknowledged that future adjustments could occur. As the airline moves forward with its new policy, the focus remains on whether it will achieve its stated goal of keeping fares low while managing customer expectations. With increasing scrutiny on airline pricing models, the response from both regulators and consumers will play a crucial role in shaping the industry's direction.

Aller aux sources primaires (1)

Les sources officielles sur lesquelles repose la couverture. Lisez-les directement pour contourner le cadrage.

1 articles

The Guardian (World) logoThe Guardian (World)IndépendantCentreFactualité 85Objectivité 75il y a 10 h
Pour une prise d'argent facile: pourquoi Jetstar facture aux clients les bagages à main

Jetstar, une compagnie aérienne à bas prix sous Qantas, a introduit une nouvelle politique de facturation des bagages à main, rejoignant d'autres compagnies aériennes dans la monétisation des services de voyage de base. À partir de l'année prochaine, les passagers ne recevront qu'un "sac sous le siège" gratuitement, tandis que les bagages à main plus gros encourront des frais supplémentaires.

Lecture du biais (Centre): Bien que l'article traite d'une pratique controversée dans l'industrie aérienne, il présente les deux côtés de l'argument.

Pourquoi factualité (85): The article accurately reports on Jetstar's new carry-on luggage charge and contextualizes it within broader industry trends. It cites specific examples like WestJet's seat recline fee and quotes experts like Graeme Hughes and Andy Kelly, aligning with cross-source consensus on the trend of airlines

Pourquoi objectivité (75): The article presents a critical perspective on Jetstar's policy, using phrases like 'easy cash grab' and highlighting traveler frustration. While it provides balanced reporting by including both industry practices and consumer concerns, the tone leans slightly toward criticism of the airline's busin

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Le même événement, regroupé selon l’orientation politique des médias qui le couvrent.

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et toutes les autres fonctions pour les soutiens.

Devenir soutien

Couverture dans le monde

Le même événement tel que rapporté dans d’autres pays.

Couverture dans le monde

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et toutes les autres fonctions pour les soutiens.

Devenir soutien

Vérification des affirmations

Les principales affirmations factuelles et combien de sources les confirment ou les contestent.

Vérification des affirmations

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et toutes les autres fonctions pour les soutiens.

Devenir soutien

Gardons l’information honnête.

ObjectiveNews est financé par ses lecteurs et sans publicité : nous vous montrons le biais au lieu de le cacher. Soutenez un journalisme indépendant pour 4 €/mois.

Devenir soutien

Sujets liés