ON
← Retour au fil
Père condamné à plus de 20 ans pour viol, agression sexuelle contre sa petite fille, alors épouse
IL🏛️ PolitiqueCentrehier

Père condamné à plus de 20 ans pour viol, agression sexuelle contre sa petite fille, alors épouse

Un père a été condamné à 20 ans et trois mois de prison pour avoir violé et agressé sexuellement sa fille de trois ans et demi et violé son épouse alors qu'elle dormait. Les condamnations étaient basées sur des preuves recueillies à travers des caméras cachées installées par la mère, qui surveillait le défendeur pendant qu'il s'occupait de l'enfant. Le tribunal a reconnu la " ingéniosité et le grand courage " de la mère dans l'exposition de l'abus, soulignant que ses actions n'exonéraient pas le défendeur de la responsabilité. Le défendeur a admis les crimes contre sa fille mais a nié avoir violé son ex-femme, bien que le tribunal ait jugé son témoignage peu fiable et a confirmé la condamnation sur la base de témoignages crédibles et de preuves corroborantes. Des accusations supplémentaires contre la fille et l'ex-femme ont été rejetées en raison d'une preuve insuffisante.

A father has been sentenced to more than 20 years in prison for raping and sexually assaulting his three-and-a-half-year-old daughter and his then-wife, according to a ruling by the Central District Court in Lod, Israel. The verdict was delivered on July 19, 2026, following a trial that exposed a pattern of abuse spanning several years. The defendant was found guilty of multiple charges, including rape and sexual assault against both his daughter and his ex-spouse. The court imposed a total sentence of 20 years and three months, combining the current case with a previously suspended three-month sentence from an earlier conviction related to assaulting and threatening the same woman. Additionally, the court mandated that the defendant pay NIS 150,000 in compensation, NIS 100,000 to his former wife and NIS 50,000 to their daughter. The case gained attention due to the method by which the victim’s mother uncovered the abuse. She suspected her husband was sexually abusing their daughter and installed hidden cameras in their home, capable of remote monitoring. After reviewing the footage, she arranged for the defendant to care for the child while she left the house. During this time, the cameras captured repeated instances of the defendant engaging in sexual misconduct with the child, often using his phone to distract her. The court acknowledged the mother’s role in bringing the abuse to light, emphasizing that her actions did not absolve the defendant of responsibility. Instead, the judges commended her “resourcefulness and great courage” for ensuring the child was protected and the abuse was stopped immediately. During the trial, the defendant admitted to the offenses against his daughter, as documented in the video recordings. However, he denied the allegations of raping his former wife. Despite his denial, the court found his testimony unreliable and deemed the prosecution’s account of the assaults credible and supported by additional evidence. The judge noted that the wife had repeatedly confronted the defendant and refused his advances during the incidents. The sexual assaults against the former wife occurred between 2017 and 2019, during the couple’s marriage. Each incident happened while she was asleep, and she woke up to find him engaged in the act. She consistently told him to stop without her consent, but he persisted. The court highlighted the severity of these crimes, stating that they violated the trust inherent in close personal relationships. The prosecution had sought a total sentence of 30 years, citing the defendant’s refusal to accept responsibility for the offenses against his wife despite clear evidence. They argued that his acknowledgment of wrongdoing regarding his daughter came only after being presented with undeniable video proof. The defense, however, requested a six-year sentence, claiming the defendant showed remorse and was open to undergoing treatment. The court rejected the defense’s plea for leniency, noting that the defendant had not completed any form of treatment or undergone a thorough sexual risk assessment. The judges maintained that the sentencing guidelines should reflect the gravity of the offenses, particularly given the nature of the crimes and their impact on the victims. The case underscores the complex legal and emotional challenges faced in prosecuting domestic abuse and incestuous crimes. It also highlights the critical role played by victims' families in uncovering and reporting such abuses, even in the face of significant personal risk. As the defendant begins his sentence, the focus will remain on the long-term recovery and support needed by the victims.

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Le même événement, regroupé selon l’orientation politique des médias qui le couvrent.

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et votre fil Pour vous personnalisé.

Devenir soutien

Couverture dans le monde

Le même événement tel que rapporté dans d’autres pays.

Couverture dans le monde

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et votre fil Pour vous personnalisé.

Devenir soutien

Vérification des affirmations

Les principales affirmations factuelles et combien de sources les confirment ou les contestent.

Vérification des affirmations

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et votre fil Pour vous personnalisé.

Devenir soutien

1 articles

The Jerusalem Post logoThe Jerusalem PostIndépendantCentreFactualité 85Objectivité 75hier
Père condamné à plus de 20 ans pour viol, agression sexuelle contre sa petite fille, alors épouse

Un père a été condamné à 20 ans et trois mois de prison pour avoir violé et agressé sexuellement sa fille de trois ans et demi et violé son épouse alors qu'elle dormait. Les condamnations étaient basées sur des preuves recueillies à travers des caméras cachées installées par la mère, qui surveillait le défendeur pendant qu'il s'occupait de l'enfant. Le tribunal a reconnu la " ingéniosité et le grand courage " de la mère dans l'exposition de l'abus, soulignant que ses actions n'exonéraient pas le défendeur de la responsabilité. Le défendeur a admis les crimes contre sa fille mais a nié avoir violé son ex-femme, bien que le tribunal ait jugé son témoignage peu fiable et a confirmé la condamnation sur la base de témoignages crédibles et de preuves corroborantes. Des accusations supplémentaires contre la fille et l'ex-femme ont été rejetées en raison d'une preuve insuffisante.

Lecture du biais (Centre): Bien que le sujet porte sur un crime grave ayant d'importantes implications sociétales, l'article présente les faits objectivement sans cadre idéologique manifeste.

Pourquoi factualité (85): The article reports a sentencing from the Central District Court in Lod, citing specific details such as the length of the sentence, the amount of compensation paid, and the judges' comments. It references the method by which the abuse was discovered through hidden cameras and the mother's role in e

Pourquoi objectivité (75): The article presents the facts in a straightforward manner but includes emotionally charged language such as 'exceptionally severe,' 'resourcefulness and great courage,' and 'prevent further harm.' While these phrases are used to highlight the gravity of the situation, they carry a subjective tone t

Gardons l’information honnête.

ObjectiveNews est financé par ses lecteurs et sans publicité : nous vous montrons le biais au lieu de le cacher. Soutenez un journalisme indépendant pour 5 €/mois.

Devenir soutien

Sujets liés