ON
← Retour au fil
L'examen externe n'a trouvé aucun acte répréhensible dans la Fondation Gates
Qatar🏛️ PolitiqueCentreil y a 8 h

L'examen externe n'a trouvé aucun acte répréhensible dans la Fondation Gates

Un examen externe commandé par la Fondation Gates n'a trouvé aucune preuve d'actes répréhensibles dans ses interactions avec le délinquant sexuel condamné Jeffrey Epstein. L'examen, mené par le cabinet d'avocats WilmerHale, a révélé que la fondation s'était engagée avec Epstein à deux reprises entre 2011 et 2014.

The Gates Foundation has concluded that there is no evidence of wrongdoing in its interactions with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, according to an external review completed by the law firm WilmerHale. The findings were announced on Tuesday following a months-long investigation commissioned by the organization in March. The report, which includes interviews with 50 current and former staff members, states that the foundation did not engage in any criminal activity or make payments linked to Epstein. The review revealed that the Gates Foundation interacted with Epstein on two separate occasions between 2011 and 2014. The first instance involved a proposed donor-advised fund aimed at supporting global public health initiatives. However, the foundation decided not to proceed with the fund after Epstein failed to meet commitments from other philanthropic partners. This decision became clear during a 2014 breakfast meeting, where the report noted that Epstein had misrepresented the potential donors' knowledge and willingness to contribute to the fund. In the second instance, Epstein facilitated an introduction between Bill Gates and the International Peace Institute (IPI) in 2012. In 2013, after IPI presented Gates with information on polio eradication efforts, the Gates Foundation awarded the institute a grant. The report stated that Gates was aware of Epstein's connections to IPI’s leadership at the time. As part of its response to the findings, the Gates Foundation has implemented new safeguards. These include a more centralized vetting process for potential donors and partners, expanded policies addressing conflicts of interest, improved training on handling sensitive information, and enhanced record management practices. While specific details of the policy changes remain undisclosed, the foundation emphasized its commitment to transparency and accountability. The release of these findings follows recent developments involving the Gates Foundation. A week prior, Berkshire Hathaway chairman Warren Buffett announced he would cease donating to the organization. Buffett, who has contributed over $47 billion in Berkshire stock since 2006, cited concerns over the foundation’s governance and ethical standards. His decision comes amid ongoing scrutiny of the foundation’s operations and relationships with high-profile individuals. During testimony before the U.S. Congress’s House Oversight Committee in June, Bill Gates acknowledged his past connections with Epstein. He described his meetings with the financier as a “grave error in judgment.” The committee had been investigating allegations of misconduct and potential violations of ethics protocols within the foundation. The Gates Foundation’s external review marks a significant step in addressing concerns raised by critics and lawmakers. While the report concludes that no wrongdoing occurred, it acknowledges the need for greater oversight and internal reforms. The foundation’s actions reflect a broader effort to navigate the complex landscape of philanthropy while maintaining public trust and adhering to legal and ethical standards. As the foundation continues to implement its new measures, the focus will remain on ensuring that future interactions align with its mission and values.

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Le même événement, regroupé selon l’orientation politique des médias qui le couvrent.

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et votre fil Pour vous personnalisé.

Devenir soutien

Couverture dans le monde

Le même événement tel que rapporté dans d’autres pays.

Couverture dans le monde

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et votre fil Pour vous personnalisé.

Devenir soutien

Vérification des affirmations

Les principales affirmations factuelles et combien de sources les confirment ou les contestent.

Vérification des affirmations

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et votre fil Pour vous personnalisé.

Devenir soutien

1 articles

Al Jazeera English logoAl Jazeera EnglishPublic / d’ÉtatCentreFactualité 85Objectivité 78il y a 8 h
L'examen externe n'a trouvé aucun acte répréhensible dans la Fondation Gates

Un examen externe commandé par la Fondation Gates n'a trouvé aucune preuve d'actes répréhensibles dans ses interactions avec le délinquant sexuel condamné Jeffrey Epstein. L'examen, mené par le cabinet d'avocats WilmerHale, a révélé que la fondation s'était engagée avec Epstein à deux reprises entre 2011 et 2014.

Lecture du biais (Centre): L'article présente un compte rendu équilibré des conclusions de l'examen externe, en se concentrant sur les résultats factuels plutôt que d'adopter une position idéologique claire.

Pourquoi factualité (85): The article reports on an external review conducted by WilmerHale, which found no wrongdoing by the Gates Foundation related to Jeffrey Epstein. It accurately describes the scope of the review, the timeframe of interactions, and the conclusions reached. However, it omits details about the controvers

Pourquoi objectivité (78): The article presents the findings of the external review in a neutral manner, focusing on the facts presented in the report. However, it uses phrases like 'rules out wrongdoing' and 'misrepresented the potential donors’ knowledge' which carry a slight evaluative tone, suggesting a bias towards the G

Gardons l’information honnête.

ObjectiveNews est financé par ses lecteurs et sans publicité : nous vous montrons le biais au lieu de le cacher. Soutenez un journalisme indépendant pour 5 €/mois.

Devenir soutien

Sujets liés