ON
← Retour au fil
Voici ce qu'un célèbre arbitre espagnol a dit à propos du but annulé de Guardiola.
Croatia⚽ Sportsil y a 14 h

Voici ce qu'un célèbre arbitre espagnol a dit à propos du but annulé de Guardiola.

During the dramatic quarter-final match of the World Cup between Croatia and Argentina, a controversial goal by Josko Gvardiol was disallowed due to a subtle handball by Croatian player Igor Matanović. The incident occurred in the 13th minute when Matanović barely touched the ball with his head, which was detected by the embedded chip in the ball. This led to the goal being nullified because the Croatian player was in an offside position at the moment of contact. Spanish referee Iturralde González explained that modern technology, including the chip in the ball, has eliminated human error in such decisions. He emphasized that the system automatically draws lines and determines offside positions, removing the need for manual intervention by referees. Despite this, the final decision to disallow the goal was made by Norwegian referee Espen Eskås. González clarified that the Portuguese defender Renato Veiga's subsequent touch did not negate the offside call, as it was considered an accidental deflection rather than an intentional kick.

1 articles

tportal logotportalIndépendantCentreFactualité 85Objectivité 75il y a 14 h
Voici ce qu'un célèbre arbitre espagnol a dit à propos du but annulé de Guardiola.

During the dramatic quarter-final match of the World Cup between Croatia and Argentina, a controversial goal by Josko Gvardiol was disallowed due to a subtle handball by Croatian player Igor Matanović. The incident occurred in the 13th minute when Matanović barely touched the ball with his head, which was detected by the embedded chip in the ball. This led to the goal being nullified because the Croatian player was in an offside position at the moment of contact. Spanish referee Iturralde González explained that modern technology, including the chip in the ball, has eliminated human error in such decisions. He emphasized that the system automatically draws lines and determines offside positions, removing the need for manual intervention by referees. Despite this, the final decision to disallow the goal was made by Norwegian referee Espen Eskås. González clarified that the Portuguese defender Renato Veiga's subsequent touch did not negate the offside call, as it was considered an accidental deflection rather than an intentional kick.

Lecture du biais (Centre): The article discusses a sports event and focuses on the technical aspects of the offside call using modern football technology. There is no political framing, bias, or controversy related to politics, officials, or public policy. The content remains neutral and factual.

Pourquoi ces scores (Factualité 85 · Objectivité 75): The article accurately describes the incident involving Matanović's contact with the ball and the subsequent goal being disallowed due to offside. It references the technology used and quotes Iturralde González, aligning with the cross-source consensus. However, it leans slightly towards supporting

Gardons l’information honnête.

ObjectiveNews est financé par ses lecteurs et sans publicité : nous vous montrons le biais au lieu de le cacher. Soutenez un journalisme indépendant pour 5 €/mois.

Devenir soutien

Sujets liés