President Donald Trump’s administration has detained more than 50 parents and spouses of active-duty U.S. troops as part of its broader immigration crackdown, according to an Associated Press investigation. These detentions, which include at least six deportations and one self-deportation, have sparked concern among military families and experts who warn the policy could harm national security and troop morale. The government does not track such cases, but the AP obtained detailed accounts by analyzing court records, media reports, and interviews with affected families and legal professionals. The detentions began shortly after Trump assumed office for a second term and have continued despite longstanding protections for military families. Parents and spouses of service members have historically been exempt from deportation under bipartisan agreements, but recent changes appear to have eroded that safeguard. Some military spouses have been detained for months while attempting to adjust their legal status through procedures designed for close relatives of service members. Others have been detained even as the military actively recruits by highlighting immigration benefits for enlisted personnel’s families. One such case involves Army Sgt. Hedar Leonel Turcios Juarez, who was stationed at Fort Bliss, Texas, when his wife was detained outside a Walmart in front of their 6-year-old daughter in July. Juarez expressed frustration over the impact on his ability to focus on his military duties. “How can I even focus on my military career because I have to worry about how my wife is doing?” he said. Similar stories emerged from other service members, many of whom reported delays in deployments, loss of emotional support, and difficulty managing household responsibilities without a spouse or parent present. The Department of Homeland Security has acknowledged the issue but maintains that military service alone does not confer legal immigration status. In statements to the AP, DHS noted that at least seven of the detained individuals had prior deportation records, eight had removal orders, and two had criminal histories related to alcohol or drugs. The agency refused to provide detailed information on individual cases, citing privacy concerns. However, the AP verified multiple instances through court filings and direct communication with affected families. For some families, the consequences have been devastating. Air Force Tech. Sgt. Wendy Gbeve described the emotional toll of watching her father, Luis Alberto Ramirez Zavala, a longtime U.S. resident, get detained during a routine interview with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. After spending nearly two weeks in custody, Ramirez Zavala was deported to Mexico. His wife, a legal permanent resident, is now considering returning to Mexico to reunite with him. Gbeve, whose husband is also in the Air Force, fears the loss of family support could lead to further instability within the military ranks. Meanwhile, states like Massachusetts have taken steps to counteract the administration’s immigration policies. Governor Maura Healey signed the PROTECT Act, which restricts local cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and limits warrantless immigration arrests in sensitive locations such as courthouses, schools, and hospitals. The law also prohibits new 287(g) agreements, partnerships between ICE and local law enforcement, and bars police from routinely asking about citizenship status. Advocates argue the measure represents one of the most comprehensive efforts to protect immigrant communities from federal enforcement. Similar legislative actions have occurred in other states, including New York, California, and Virginia, reflecting growing resistance to Trump’s deportation agenda. These measures come amid ongoing legal battles, with the federal government challenging sanctuary city policies in courts. Despite these efforts, the administration continues to prioritize mass deportation, arguing that strict enforcement is necessary to uphold immigration laws and maintain national security. As the backlog of immigration applications grows, critics accuse the administration of intentionally delaying processing to increase the number of people caught in legal limbo. With over 12.1 million people awaiting decisions on citizenship, green cards, or work permits, the situation has created a surge in ICE arrests. Legal experts warn that this strategy risks exposing otherwise law-abiding immigrants to deportation, effectively creating a system of entrapment. While the administration claims it is improving efficiency and enforcing the rule of law, opponents argue the policy undermines trust in the immigration system and threatens the stability of military families and communities.
★
Gardons l’information honnête.
ObjectiveNews est financé par ses lecteurs et sans publicité : nous vous montrons le biais au lieu de le cacher. Soutenez un journalisme indépendant pour 4 €/mois.
Devenir soutien
United States
