ON
← Retour au fil
Le gouvernement a payé la FEPC, mais a laissé le compte pour plus tard.
CO🏛️ PolitiqueProgressisteil y a 12 h

Le gouvernement a payé la FEPC, mais a laissé le compte pour plus tard.

L'article discute des implications financières du Fonds de stabilisation des prix du carburant (Fepc) de Colombie, soulignant comment le gouvernement actuel a traité ses déficits en émettant de la dette publique plutôt que d'utiliser des ressources directes. Il note que si les gouvernements précédents ont couvert les déficits grâce aux bénéfices d'Ecopetrol ou aux fonds nationaux, les dernières années ont vu un changement vers un emprunt accru.

The Colombian government has paid off part of its fuel price stabilization fund's (Fepc) debt, but instead of using its own resources, it has resorted to issuing public debt, effectively passing some of the financial burden onto future administrations. This approach was revealed through statements made by President Gustavo Petro earlier this year, who highlighted how recent deterioration in public finances can be attributed largely to the Fepc's deficit. While the government claims much of this debt was inherited from previous administrations, it is acknowledged that a portion of the deficit occurred during the current administration’s tenure. The key point often overlooked is that since late 2024, the government has been settling Fepc obligations with Ecopetrol by issuing public debt, thereby shifting a significant share of the responsibility to future governments. The Fepc was established in 2007 to shield Colombians from abrupt fluctuations in international oil prices. When global gasoline or diesel prices exceed the government-set domestic levels, the fund covers the difference to prevent sharp increases in consumer prices. Conversely, when international prices are low, domestic prices are set higher, allowing the fund to accumulate resources for future periods of high prices. However, over the past few years, rising international fuel prices combined with the political cost of raising domestic prices have led to substantial deficits within the Fepc. What began as a mechanism for stabilizing prices has become one of the country’s largest fiscal obligations in recent times. Deficits in the Fepc are not new. Since 2010, the fund has recorded only one surplus in 2020. For much of that period, however, the amount owed by the nation was relatively manageable. Between 2010 and 2019, annual deficits averaged around $1.5 trillion, which previous governments could cover using available funds or compensation from Ecopetrol, the fund’s main creditor. An example of this was in 2023, when the government settled the accumulated 2022 deficit of $36.7 trillion using a $21.5 trillion accounting adjustment from Ecopetrol profits and covering the remainder with its own resources. However, the growing magnitude of the accumulated deficit and worsening public finances prompted the current government to implement two measures. The first was accelerating the increase in domestic fuel prices to reduce the gap between internal and international prices, thus lowering the amount payable under the Fepc. The second, less visible measure, involved financing Fepc payments through the issuance of public debt. Starting in the second half of 2024, the government began replacing debt owed to Ecopetrol with debt issued to investors purchasing national debt instruments. In 2024, the government paid $20.6 trillion related to the accumulated Fepc deficit. Of this total, nearly $9.6 trillion, or 46 percent, was covered by issuing long-term domestic debt instruments known as TES (Títulos de Tesorería). According to calculations by Investigaciones Económicas of the Banco de Bogotá, these payments were made using bonds maturing in 2036. This method allows the government to manage immediate liquidity issues while deferring the repayment obligation to future administrations, potentially impacting the country’s fiscal landscape in the coming years. The shift in funding strategy reflects broader economic challenges faced by Colombia, including managing inflationary pressures and maintaining fiscal sustainability amid volatile global energy markets. As the government continues to navigate these complexities, the reliance on public debt to address the Fepc deficit raises questions about long-term fiscal planning and the potential implications for future budgets. With the current approach, the government aims to balance immediate financial demands with the need to ensure economic stability over time.

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Le même événement, regroupé selon l’orientation politique des médias qui le couvrent.

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et votre fil Pour vous personnalisé.

Devenir soutien

Couverture dans le monde

Le même événement tel que rapporté dans d’autres pays.

Couverture dans le monde

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et votre fil Pour vous personnalisé.

Devenir soutien

Vérification des affirmations

Les principales affirmations factuelles et combien de sources les confirment ou les contestent.

Vérification des affirmations

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et votre fil Pour vous personnalisé.

Devenir soutien

Aller aux sources primaires (3)

Les sources officielles sur lesquelles repose la couverture. Lisez-les directement pour contourner le cadrage.

1 articles

La Silla Vacía logoLa Silla VacíaIndépendantProgressisteil y a 12 h
Le gouvernement a payé la FEPC, mais a laissé le compte pour plus tard.

L'article discute des implications financières du Fonds de stabilisation des prix du carburant (Fepc) de Colombie, soulignant comment le gouvernement actuel a traité ses déficits en émettant de la dette publique plutôt que d'utiliser des ressources directes. Il note que si les gouvernements précédents ont couvert les déficits grâce aux bénéfices d'Ecopetrol ou aux fonds nationaux, les dernières années ont vu un changement vers un emprunt accru.

Lecture du biais (Progressiste): L'article présente la décision du gouvernement d'émettre de la dette publique comme un geste stratégique qui transfère la responsabilité financière aux administrations futures, ce qui implique des risques économiques potentiels à long terme.

Gardons l’information honnête.

ObjectiveNews est financé par ses lecteurs et sans publicité : nous vous montrons le biais au lieu de le cacher. Soutenez un journalisme indépendant pour 5 €/mois.

Devenir soutien

Sujets liés