ON
← Retour au fil
Netflix est poursuivi pour la disparition d'un film de Nicolas Cage
MX🎭 Culturehier

Netflix est poursuivi pour la disparition d'un film de Nicolas Cage

Un producteur de cinéma a poursuivi Netflix pour la disparition d'un film de la Seconde Guerre mondiale mettant en vedette Nicolas Cage intitulé 'Fortitude'. Le procès a été intenté par l'écrivain et producteur Simon Afram devant un tribunal fédéral de Californie, alléguant que Netflix avait perdu une copie non cryptée du film stockée sur un disque dur. Le film a été livré à Netflix à la mi-juin pour projection et achat, mais peu de temps après, Netflix a informé les producteurs que plusieurs disques durs avaient été volés de leurs bureaux de Los Angeles, y compris 'Fortitude'.

Simon Afram, a film producer and screenwriter, has filed a lawsuit against Netflix over the disappearance of a World War II movie starring Nicolas Cage titled Fortitude. The legal action was submitted last Wednesday before a federal court in California, alleging that Netflix lost an unencrypted hard drive containing the film after it was handed over to the streaming giant’s headquarters in Hollywood. According to the complaint, the movie was delivered to Netflix in mid-June for screening and potential purchase. A few days later, Netflix reportedly sent an email to the plaintiffs informing them of the theft of “a significant number” of hard drives from its offices in Los Angeles, including Fortitude. Afram claims that Netflix refused to disclose whether it had reported the incident to authorities or sought assistance from security agencies to recover the footage. Afram alleges he invested more than $45 million into the production of Fortitude, which took seven years to complete and was in the process of being sold to distributors. He is seeking compensation of at least $105 million, according to the filing. The lawsuit highlights concerns over the handling of physical media by major studios and raises questions about the adequacy of security measures used during the transfer and storage of high-value content. Netflix responded to the allegations through a spokesperson who stated in a statement shared by Deadline that the company would not accept responsibility for the loss of a film distributed without adhering to standard industry security protocols. The statement did not confirm or deny whether the hard drive was ever reported to law enforcement or if any recovery efforts were undertaken. The case centers around the physical delivery of the film, which was reportedly handed over to Netflix in June. While the company acknowledged the theft of multiple hard drives, it did not specify whether Fortitude was among them or how it was handled internally. The lack of transparency regarding the incident has fueled further scrutiny over how such valuable assets are managed within large entertainment corporations. Afram’s legal team argues that the loss of Fortitude represents a substantial financial and creative setback, given the time and resources invested in the project. They claim that Netflix failed to take appropriate steps to safeguard the material once it entered their possession. The lawsuit seeks not only monetary damages but also accountability for the alleged negligence in securing the film. The dispute comes amid growing concerns in the entertainment industry about the risks associated with digital and physical media distribution. As more content moves online, the need for robust security measures becomes increasingly critical. This case could set a precedent for how companies handle similar situations involving lost or stolen intellectual property. Industry experts have noted that while digital distribution has become the norm, physical media still plays a role in certain aspects of film production and distribution. The handling of such materials often involves complex logistics and requires strict adherence to security guidelines to prevent losses. The outcome of this lawsuit may influence future practices in how films are transferred and stored by major studios. As the legal proceedings unfold, both parties are expected to provide further evidence and testimony regarding the circumstances surrounding the disappearance of Fortitude. The case will likely draw attention from the entertainment sector, particularly concerning the responsibilities of platforms like Netflix in protecting the content they receive for distribution.

1 articles

El Universal logoEl UniversalIndépendantCentreFactualité 85Objectivité 70hier
Netflix est poursuivi pour la disparition d'un film de Nicolas Cage

Un producteur de cinéma a poursuivi Netflix pour la disparition d'un film de la Seconde Guerre mondiale mettant en vedette Nicolas Cage intitulé 'Fortitude'. Le procès a été intenté par l'écrivain et producteur Simon Afram devant un tribunal fédéral de Californie, alléguant que Netflix avait perdu une copie non cryptée du film stockée sur un disque dur. Le film a été livré à Netflix à la mi-juin pour projection et achat, mais peu de temps après, Netflix a informé les producteurs que plusieurs disques durs avaient été volés de leurs bureaux de Los Angeles, y compris 'Fortitude'.

Lecture du biais (Centre): L'article fait état d'un litige juridique impliquant une plateforme de production et de diffusion de films, se concentrant sur la perte d'un film plutôt que sur une question politique, un personnage ou une politique.

Pourquoi factualité (85): The article reports on a lawsuit filed by Simon Afram against Netflix over the disappearance of a Nicolas Cage film titled 'Fortitude'. It cites the claim that Netflix lost an unencrypted hard drive containing the movie, and that the production cost $45 million over seven years. The article also men

Pourquoi objectivité (70): The article presents the lawsuit from the perspective of the plaintiff, Simon Afram, and includes his allegations against Netflix. While it quotes both sides (Netflix's denial), the tone leans toward portraying Netflix as negligent, which introduces some bias. The language used ('demandan', 'exige u

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Le même événement, regroupé selon l’orientation politique des médias qui le couvrent.

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et toutes les autres fonctions pour les soutiens.

Devenir soutien

Couverture dans le monde

Le même événement tel que rapporté dans d’autres pays.

Couverture dans le monde

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et toutes les autres fonctions pour les soutiens.

Devenir soutien

Vérification des affirmations

Les principales affirmations factuelles et combien de sources les confirment ou les contestent.

Vérification des affirmations

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et toutes les autres fonctions pour les soutiens.

Devenir soutien

Gardons l’information honnête.

ObjectiveNews est financé par ses lecteurs et sans publicité : nous vous montrons le biais au lieu de le cacher. Soutenez un journalisme indépendant pour 4 €/mois.

Devenir soutien

Sujets liés